The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dig nick translation mix

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

The DIG-Nick Translation Mix is a laboratory reagent used for the incorporation of digoxigenin-labeled nucleotides into DNA or RNA during a nick translation reaction. The mix contains the necessary enzymes, buffers, and labeled nucleotides to facilitate this process.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using dig nick translation mix

1

Immuno-DNA FISH Analysis of Genomic Loci

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunomagnetic isolated cells were spotted onto poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips and left to settle for 15–30 minutes at RT. Cells were then processed for immune-DNA FISH as described previously10 (link), with the following modifications. Digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled probes were prepared by labeling 1 μg of BAC DNA using DIG-Nick Translation Mix (Sigma-Aldrich) and cells were subjected to IF with an anti-DIG antibody (Sigma-Aldrich). The following BAC probes from BACPAC resources, CHORI were used: Cav2 BAC (RP23-448I4), cJun BAC (RP24-282B18), and Nup62 BAC (RP23-403D23).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Haploid Production and Ploidy Determination of Wheat Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Haploid production of the zip4-ph1d mutant and Cadenza wild type was performed as previously described43 (link) with some modifications. Briefly, all plant material was grown in a controlled environmental room as described in the plant material section. A solution of 2,4-D 5 mg/l + AgNO3 100 mg/l was applied in vivo by filling each floret with the solution, 24 h after pollination with maize. Wheat regeneration media described in Hayta et al.44 (link), was used to culture the embryo rescued. Ploidy level of the seedlings was determined using GISH (genomic in situ hybridisation) in metaphase spreads from root tips as previously described45 (link),46 (link). Triticum urartu, and Aegilops tauschii were used as probes to label wheat A- and wheat D-genomes, respectively. Aegilops speltoides genomic DNA was used as a competitor in the hybridisation mix. T. urartu, and Ae. tauschii genomes were labelled with Biotin-16-dUTP and digoxigenin-11-dUTP using the Biotin- or the DIG-nick translation mix, respectively, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Biotin-labelled probes were detected with Streptavidin-Alexa 660 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States); digoxigenin-labelled probes were detected with anti-digoxigenin-FITC (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immuno-DNA FISH Analysis of Genomic Loci

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunomagnetic isolated cells were spotted onto poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips and left to settle for 15–30 minutes at RT. Cells were then processed for immune-DNA FISH as described previously10 (link), with the following modifications. Digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled probes were prepared by labeling 1 μg of BAC DNA using DIG-Nick Translation Mix (Sigma-Aldrich) and cells were subjected to IF with an anti-DIG antibody (Sigma-Aldrich). The following BAC probes from BACPAC resources, CHORI were used: Cav2 BAC (RP23-448I4), cJun BAC (RP24-282B18), and Nup62 BAC (RP23-403D23).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fluorescence in situ Hybridization of Plant Nuclei

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flower buds were sampled from 5- to 6-week-old plants and fixed in Farmer’s solution (acetic acid:ethanol, 1:3) for 1 h at 25 °C. Fixed buds were washed with 70% ethanol and then with distilled water for 5 min. The buds were treated with an enzyme solution (2% w/v cellulose Onozuka RS, 0.5% w/v pectolyase Y-23, 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 4.5) at 37 °C for 1 h. The buds were broken by pipetting and then filtered through a 100-µm nylon mesh. The filtered nuclear solution was centrifuged at 5000 × g for 1 min and the pellet was resuspended in Farmer’s solution. A drop of the nuclear solution was placed on a glass slide and allowed to dry. Then, FISH was performed as previously described46 (link). A centromere probe was amplified by PCR and labeled by nick translation using DIG-Nick Translation Mix (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Hybridized probes were visualized using a rhodamine-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich). The number, size, and fluorescence intensity of FISH signals were measured using ImageJ 1.51 g. A binary image was generated from the fluorescent image and “Analyze Particles” in ImageJ was used to determine the signal size. To measure the fluorescence intensity, one pericentromeric signal was clipped from the raw image and “Measure” was used to determine the signal intensity. Subsequently, the background was subtracted from the signal intensity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chromosome Metaphase and FISH Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze metaphase chromosomes, cells in metaphase were harvested using standard procedures. Briefly, cells were swollen in 75 mM KCl (at 37°C), fixed in methanol:acetic acid (3:1) and then dropped onto glass slides. To analyze anaphase and cytokinesis-blocked cells, cells were seeded on poly-L-Lysine slides (Sigma-Aldrich) and fixed in methanol:acetic acid (3:1) for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. BAC clones were used to prepare FISH probes targeting the regions of interests: RP11-439L14 (GenBank: AC012454.8) for FOLD1, RP11-464P18 (GenBank: AC073105.1) for Chr2Q, RP11-799C6 (GenBank: AC068519.1) for Chr1CCEN, RP11-383P16 (GenBank: AC233288.1) for FRAXA (Supplementary Figure 1A). Probes were labeled using the BioNick labeling system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or DIG-nick translation mix (Sigma Aldrich). FISH was carried out using standard procedures, as previously published (Bjerregaard et al., 2018 (link)). Slides were mounted using Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Labs). Images were captured using an Olympus BX63 microscope. Images were analyzed using CellSens (Olympus) or Fiji/ImageJ software. In the analysis of “bent” shape of human chromosome 2 (Chr2), all of the images were analyzed independently by two researchers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mapping rDNA Genes and Microsatellites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA probe used for mapping the rDNA genes was pTa71. This plasmid contains a 9-kb EcoRI fragment from Triticum aestivum that includes the 45S rDNA region69 (link). pTa71 was labeled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP using a kit from Sigma-Aldrich (Dig-nick translation mix).
Telomeric repeats at both ends were detected using the single-strand oligonucleotide (CCCTAAA)3, synthesized with Dy547 (red) (Isogen Life Science).
Four oligonucleotides, (AG)10, (AC)10, (GATA)4 and (GACA)4, supplied with biotin incorporated at both ends (Isogen Life Science), were used to analyze the microsatellites. They are representative of the most abundant microsatellite motifs clustered at the chromosomal level in the species so far analyzed47 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Chromosome Preparation and GISH Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromosome preparation and GISH were carried out as described previously (Rey et al. 2018) (link).
Aegilops taushii was used as a probe to label wheat D genome. H. chilense and A. taushii genomic DNA were labelled with biotin-16-dUTP and digoxigenin-11-dUTP, using the Biotinnick translation mix and the DIG-nick translation mix respectively (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Images were taken using a Leica DM5500B microscope equipped with a Hamamatsu ORCA-FLASH4.0 camera and controlled by Leica LAS X software v2.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!