The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Kaspar

Manufactured by LGC
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States

The KASPar is a highly sensitive and specific DNA genotyping technology that enables accurate allelic discrimination. It utilizes competitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) for efficient and reliable genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertions/deletions (indels).

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using kaspar

1

Genomic DNA Extraction and Genotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood from using a standard cell lysis, phenol chloroform technique [40 ]. The ECACC DNA was pre-extracted from transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines.
Primers for genotyping were designed using PrimerPicker software (http://www.lgcgroup.com/genotyping/) (Table 2). Genotyping for the ALH1B1 SNPs was carried out, in-house, using fluorescent competitive allele specific PCR reagents (KASPar; LGC Genomics, Hoddesdon, UK). Amplification and detection was undertaken using a LightCycler® 480 real time PCR system (Roche Applied Science, Burgess Hill, UK). Genotype calling was performed automatically by built-in Roche software of cluster plots with some manual editing of calls. Approximately 12% of samples, randomly selected a priori, were genotyped in duplicate to ensure consistent allele calling.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genome-Wide Mapping of Mutations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Parental and ru h th st cu st e ca (rucuca) chromosomes were sequenced at 168- and 28-fold coverage, respectively. These levels of coverage allowed us to reassemble ~99% of the euchromatic coding genome for each stock and provided a high density of euchromatic SNP markers (averaging 1 per 1.5 kb) for recombination mapping. Individual mutant chromosomes were sequenced at about 20-fold coverage.
The basis for SNP-based mapping of causative mutations is presented in Figure 2. Recombinant females (*?FRT2A/TM3, Sb or TM6, Tb F2 virgin recombinant females; “*?” representing the possibly mutant recombinant chromosome) were individually mated with tester males carrying TM3, Ser for phenotypic retesting, SNP mapping, and to make stocks of informative recombinants. DNA was extracted from individual *?FRT2A/TM3, Ser F3 males and used for high-throughput allelic-discrimination polymerase chain reaction (KASPAr; LGC Genomics, http://www.lgcgenomics.com/), which provide a two-color fluorescence assay for SNP genotyping in microtiter plates (File S2). F3 females showing recombination between proximal and distal SNPs were tested phenotypically as in the primary screen. Additional details are presented in the section Results and File S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

KASPar Assay for SNP Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SNP genotyping was performed using the competitive allele-specific PCR (KASPar) assay, following the manufacturer's protocol (LGC Genomics, Berlin, Germany). Primers were designed using Primerpicker (KBioscience, Hoddesdon, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genetic Variants in SYNE1 and BPD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine whether potentially aetiological non-synonymous variants in SYNE1 increase susceptibility to BPD, fluorescent allele-specific PCR (KASPar) (LGC Genomics, Hoddesdon, UK) genotyping assays were designed. The three SYNE1 variants identified by HRM, rs374866393, rs148346599, and rs200629713, were KASPar genotyped on a LightCycler 480 RealTime PCR System (Roche, Burgess Hill, UK) in all 1,099 UCL1 and UCL2 BPD and control samples. Quality control to confirm the reproducibility of genotypes was performed as described previously (Dedman et al., 2012 ). All these data were analysed to confirm Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). Genotypic and allelic associations as well as burden analysis for rare single nucleotide variants were determined using Fisher’s exact tests. Significance values shown for all analyses are uncorrected for multiple testing and a cut-off significance value of P < 0.05 was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genotyping of MMP Gene Polymorphisms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole-blood frozen samples collected at the inclusion in any of the abovementioned studies using the Qiagen FlexiGene Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
Putatively functional SNPs with minor allele frequency of at least 5% in European population were selected for analysis: all nonsynonymous SNPs and SNPs in 3′ and 5′ untranslated regions. No SNPs in intronic regions were selected. Additionally, some SNPs were selected based on previously published literature. Ten different polymorphisms in three MMP genes fulfilling these criteria were genotyped: MMP2 rs243865, rs243849, and rs7201; MMP9 rs17576, rs17577, rs2250889, and rs20544; and MMP14 rs1042703, rs1042704, and rs743257. Predicted function of these polymorphisms was assessed using SNP function prediction [22 (link)]. For SNPs in 5′ or 3′ untranslated regions, HaploReg v4.1 [23 (link)] and GTEx [24 (link)] were also used.
The genotyping of all the SNPs was carried out using a fluorescence-based competitive allele-specific assay (KASPar), according to the manufacturer's instructions (LGC Genomics, UK). For all investigated polymorphisms, 15% of samples were genotyped in duplicates. Genotyping quality control criteria included 100% duplicate call rate and 95% SNP-wise call rate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Validating KRAS and TP53 Mutations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
KASPar genotyping assays (KASP-By-Design, LGC group, Teddington, UK) on the Fluidigm genotyping platform (48.48 Dynamic Array IFG, Fluidigm, San Francisco, CA) were used to validate 6 mutations in KRAS and 8 mutations in TP53. The same methodology was applied to genotype 13 SNPs used to ensure that adjacent and tumor tissues were matched (Supplementary Table 2). Each genotyping assay was previously validated and optimized on the Light-Cycler 480 real-time PCR detection system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genotyping Candidate Genes in Hu Sheep

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To verify that the candidate genes selected from the 30 domesticated sheep breeds during the domestication process were associated with immune response, blood DNA from 904 individuals was extracted from our previously established Hu sheep population with accurate immune trait data records (Zhang et al., 2022 (link)). The candidate gene loci were genotyped using competitive allele-specific fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based PCR (KBioscience competitive allele-specific PCR amplification of target sequences and endpoint fluorescence genotyping (KASPar™)) assays (LGC Genomics, UK) according to a previously published method (Zhang et al., 2021b (link)). The primer pairs for SNPs designed for KASPar genotyping are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genotyping Cardiac Risk SNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping of NPHSII samples was performed on DNA extracted from blood and carried out using Taqman (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and KASPar (LGC, Teddington, UK) genotyping assays as well as restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. For the CoRDia SMI + RR arm, saliva was collected using the Oragene-DNA OG-250 and DNA manually purified using DNA Genotek’s PrepIt-L2P DNA extraction kit (DNA Genotek Inc., Ontario, Canada). Individuals in the CoRDia SMI + RR arm and selected NPHSII samples (n = 185) were genotyped using the Cardiac Risk Prediction Array (Randox Laboratories Ltd, Crumlin, Co Antrim, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Cardiac Risk Prediction Array is a multiplex SNP genotyping system which uses Randox’s Biochip Array Technology [13 (link)] to genotype 19 CHD risk SNPs. The protocol involves using multiplex PCR to amplify target DNA in an allele-specific manner. Amplicons are detected by hybridisation to spatially tethered probes on the biochip array surface. Each position on the biochip array corresponds to a specific allele and genotypes are determined using the Evidence Investigator Analyser. In some instances (e.g. for rare genotypes) Sanger sequencing was used to confirm the result.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Allele-Specific PCR Genotyping of MCPH1 Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent allele-specific PCR genotyping assays were designed for the MCPH1 variants (KASPar; LGC Genomics, Hoddesdon, UK). Genotyping was performed on a LightCycler 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche Diagnostics, Burgess Hill, UK) in BPD, SCZ, and control samples. Validation of the genotypes in heterozygote individuals was performed with DNA sequencing (3730xl DNA Analyzer, Applied Biosystems, UK). Genotyping assays were validated by including DNA samples that carried the alternate allele for each variant tested on all of the genotyping plates. The assay for rs61749465 was validated by the inclusion of DNA from a BPD subject known to be heterozygous for the variant from whole genome sequence data generated in a subset of the UCL BPD cohort [Fiorentino and others 2015 (link)] and the assay for rs199422124 was validated using DNA from a cDNA clone carrying the variant allele (see below). Data were analyzed to confirm Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and tests of allelic association were performed using a Fisher’s exact test. A cut-off significance value of P < 0.05 was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genotyping of Genetic Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TaqMan assays (Applied Biosystems) were used to genotype for LDLR W23X (rs267607213), W66G(rs121908025) and W556S, and APOB R3500Q(rs5742904) mutations. PCSK9 R46L(rs11591147), R237W(rs148195424), I474V(rs562556) and E670G(rs505151), NPC1L1 -18(rs41279633) and V1296V(rs217434), and HMGCR (rs17238484) were genotyped by either TaqMan assays or a competitive allele-specific polymerase chain reaction system (KASPar; LGC Genomics). All genotypes appeared to be in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P >0.05), and call rates were >99%. Sequencing of randomly selected individuals was used to verify genotyping.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!