The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using axiocam cm1

1

Quantitative Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Zeiss Axio Vert.A1 microscope with an AxioCam Cm1 was used to capture optical microscopy images, and a Zeiss Axio Vert.A1 fluorescence microscope with a Zeiss AxioCam Cm1 was used to capture fluorescence microscopy images. ImageJ software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/; accessed on 1 March 2024) was used to analyze fluorescence images. The background was removed, and the figures were converted to 8-bit pictures. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn around the nucleus (for transcription factors and apoptosis effectors) or around the cells in general (for cytoplasmic probes), and subsequently, fluorescence intensity was determined by applying the same threshold to cells under control and treatment conditions. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was obtained by normalizing the total fluorescence to the number of nuclei (250 nuclei).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cytogenetic Analysis of Chinese Hamster Chromosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chromosomes were analyzed with Axio Scope.A1 microscope coupled to an image capturing system AxioCam Cm1 (Carl Zeiss, Germany) using a 100 × oil objective. The number of chromosomes in 100 G-banded metaphase spreads was determined. At least 35 C- and Ag-stained metaphase spreads per each technique were examined using a 100 × oil objective. Karyotyping of 112 cells was performed on Axio Imager A2 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) equipped with the Ikaros4 Karyotyping System (MetaSystems, Germany) using a 63 × oil objective. Percent of polyploid cells was estimated by viewing of 1000 metaphase plates. The nomenclature for Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus) chromosomes at 325-band [26 (link)] and 575-band [27 (link)] levels of resolution was employed for chromosome identification. Karyotype and structurally rearranged chromosomes described according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature ISCN, 2016 [28 ]. The frequency of chromosome involvement in clonal and nonclonal ASR was calculated as the ratio of the number of structural rearrangements of each chromosome to the number of the corresponding chromosome in 112 karyotypes. To compare frequencies, Fisher’s exact test was used. For calculations, a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Jurkat Cell Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the effect of synthetic peptides on Jurkat cells proliferation, we evaluated the percentage of Ki-67 positive nuclei according to Ref. [33 (link)]. Briefly, the treated cells were fixed with cold ethanol (−20 °C) for 20 min followed by 10% bovine serum albumin (BSA) blockage. Thereafter, cells were incubated overnight with anti-Ki-67 monoclonal mouse antibody conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate isomer 1 (FITC, Cat #F0788, Dako) 1:200. The nuclei were stained with 1 μM Hoechst 33342 (life technologies). Ki-67 reactivity was quantified in a Zeiss Axiostart 100 Fluorescence Microscope equipped with a Zeiss AxioCam Cm1 (Zeiss Wöhlk-Contact-Linsen, Gmb Schcönkirchen, Germany) by assessing the labeling percentage from the ratio of the number of nuclei-stained Ki-67 to the total number of nuclei counted per section. At least 10 different randomly selected areas were counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Light microscopy photographs and fluorescence microscopy photographs were taken and analyzed exactly as previously reported by27 (link) using a Zeiss Axiostart 50 Fluorescence Microscope equipped with a Zeiss AxioCam Cm1 and (Zeiss Whlk-Contact-Linsfluoreen, Gmb Schconkirchen, Germany) and Floyd Cells Imaging Station microscope. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was obtained by normalizing total fluorescence to the number of nuclei.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Neurite Growth Quantification in 2D and 3D Co-Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss Axiolab A1, Axiocam Cm1) was used to capture images of neurites from five pre‐determined fields of each gel or coverslip using a ×20 lens. The neurite number in the determined fields depended on the cell type and model used (~1–12 neurites). Briefly, the positions of the pre‐determined fields on coverslips were equally spaced (625‐μm apart) in a line across the diameter at the center of the coverslip, for the gels the same method was used but the line of fields was along the edge of the construct where alignment was greatest. The length of each neurite in each field was measured using ImageJ. Following stabilization the gel acquired a thickness of 100 μm and the neurons extended predominantly in a single horizontal plane along the top surface, following the aligned Schwann cells (Phillips, 2014). This allowed analysis of neurite growth to be comparable between both the monolayer and 3D co‐cultures.
Tile scans were used to capture high‐magnification (x20) micrographs from the entire nerve cross‐section using a Zeiss LSM 710 Confocal microscope and images were analyzed using Volocity™ 6.4 (PerkinElmer) running automated image analysis protocols to determine the number of neurofilament‐immunoreactive neurites in each transverse nerve section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Neurite Outgrowth via Fluorescence Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss Axiolab A1, Axiocam Cm1, Carl Zeiss GmbH) was used to capture images of neurites from five pre-determined fields of each gel using a ×20 lens. The positions of the pre-determined fields on the gels were equally spaced (625 μm apart) in a line along the edge of the construct where alignment was greatest [27 (link)]. The length of each neurite in each field (~1–12 neurites) was measured using Fiji ImageJ [29 (link)]. Following stabilization, the gel acquired a thickness of 100 μm and the neurons extended predominantly in a single horizontal plane along the top surface, following the aligned Schwann cells [30 (link)].
Tile scans were used to capture high-magnification (×20) micrographs from the entire nerve cross-section using a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope and images were analysed using Volocity™ 6.4 (PerkinElmer, Beaconsfield, UK) running automated image analysis protocols to determine the number of neurofilament-immunoreactive neurites in each transverse nerve section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunocytochemical Analysis of Neurodegeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis of markers related to AD, oxidative stress, and cell death was performed exactly as described in ref. [32 (link)]. Briefly, cells subjected to varying treatments were fixed for 20 min with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, and blocked with 10% BSA. The cells were incubated overnight with primary antibodies described in Table 3. After thorough rinsing, the cells were incubated with secondary fluorescent antibodies, and the nuclei were stained with 1 μM Hoechst 33342 (Life Technologies, Cat# H3570, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Images were acquired on a Zeiss Axio Vert.A1 equipped with a Zeiss AxioCam Cm1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescent Localization of xCT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
66.1 cells were seeded on gelatin-coated glass coverslips, fixed at 48h with ice cold 70% ethanol and permeabilized with 0.25% Triton. Coverslips were incubated with anti-xCT polyclonal antibody (NB300-318; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO; 1:50 dilution in 5% BSA). AlexaFluor® 488 goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (2.5 μg/ml; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was prepared in 5% BSA with 1% normal donkey serum. Coverslips were mounted on glass slides with ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Slides were imaged on a Zeiss Axioskop 40 using a 63x/0.08 numerical aperture Achroplan objective. Images were captured with a Zeiss AxioCam-Cm 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fluorescence Microscopy Imaging and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fluorescent microscopy photographs were taken using a Zeiss Axiostart 100 Fluorescence Microscope equipped with a Zeiss AxioCam Cm1 (Zeiss Wöhlk-Contact-Linsen, Gmb Schcönkirchen, Germany). Images were analyzed by ImageJ software [40 (link)]. The figures were transformed into 8-bit images and the background was subtracted. The cellular measurement regions of interest (ROI) were drawn over cell structures (i.e., membrane or mitochondria) and the fluorescence intensity was subsequently determined by applying the same threshold for controls and treatments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Staining of XCT Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
66.1 cells were seeded on gelatin-coated glass coverslips, fixed at 48 hours with ice-cold 70% ethanol and permeabilized with 0.25% Triton. Coverslips were incubated with anti-XCT polyclonal antibody (NB300-318; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO; 1:50 dilution in 5% BSA). AlexaFluor 488 goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (2.5 μg/mL; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was prepared in 5% BSA with 1% normal donkey serum. Coverslips were mounted on glass slides with ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Slides were imaged on a Zeiss Axioskop 40 using a 63x/0.08 numerical aperture Achroplan objective. Images were captured with a Zeiss AxioCam-Cm 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!