The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Kta purifier

Manufactured by Cytiva
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States

The Äkta Purifier is a state-of-the-art liquid chromatography system designed for protein purification. It is capable of performing fast, high-resolution protein separations and can be used for a wide range of applications, including purification of antibodies, enzymes, and other biomolecules.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using kta purifier

1

Heterologous Expression and Purification of CodY

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heterologous expression of CodY from B. cereus INRA C3 and B. cytotoxicus CVUAS 2833 was performed in E. coli BL21(DE3) as a soluble N-terminal His6-tag fusion protein using the plasmid pET28b(+) as described previously (Frenzel et al., 2012 (link)). The primers CodY-C3-for, CodY-C3-rev, CodY-CVUAS-for and CodY-CVUAS-rev (Supplementary Table S2) containing restriction sites for NdeI and XhoI, respectively, were used to construct the overexpression plasmid.
Protein expression was induced in LB medium at an OD600 of 0.6 with 1 mM IPTG and cells were harvested after 5 h. Cell disruption and protein purification were performed as described (Frenzel et al., 2012 (link)) with the exception of using the Äkta purifier (Amersham Biosciences) with a Frac-950 fractionator. A step-wise elution was performed by increasing imidazole concentration from 10 mM to 83.5 mM, 304 mM, and 402 mM to a final concentration of 500 mM. CodY-containing fractions were pooled and then dialyzed and concentrated in buffer BS using ultrafiltration columns with a 10 kDa cut-off (Amicon Ultra-15, Merck Millipore). Protein purity was analyzed on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel with Coomassie staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Purification of Recombinant CaMKII Holoenzyme

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant human CaMKIIδ (NCBI RefSeq: NP_742113.1) with an N-terminal 6xHN tag was integrated into a baculoviral construct (BacPAK9-6xHN), amplified in Sf9 insect cells (expression systems), and expressed in Hi5 (T. ni; (Expression Systems)) insect cells [64 (link)]. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to generate monomeric hCaMKIIδ1–317 (i.e., CaMKIIm) (by truncation through the addition of stop codon at aa318). Kinases were purified under reducing conditions by affinity chromatography (NiNTA resin) followed by size exclusion chromatography (Sephacryl S-400 [holoenzyme] or S-300 [CaMKIIm]) using an Äkta Purifier (Amersham). SDS-PAGE of the purified proteins revealed a single band with purities > 98%. Recombinant calmodulin was expressed and purified in E.coli as described previously [12 (link), 65 (link)] via boiling, ammonium sulfate precipitation, and phenyl-sepharose affinity chromatography.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification of Recombinant Protease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protease ligated into pET11a was expressed in a culture of E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). After the disruption of cells by sonication, the protease was then isolated from the inclusion bodies using multiple centrifugation steps in accordance with an HIV protease expression protocol [51 (link)]. Thereafter, the protease was purified using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) with the aid of an ÄKTA purifier (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), using a POROS 20 R2 (PE Biosystems, PerSeptive Biosystems, Framingham, MA, USA) C18 column [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analysis of Purified Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The molecular masses of the purified proteins in a denatured state were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (53 (link), 54 ). Immunodetection of the His10-tagged proteins was performed via Western blotting (55 (link)) using a nitrocellulose blotting membrane (Amersham Protran 0.45-μm NC, GE Healthcare, Germany) and a Penta-His horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate antibody (Qiagen, Germany).
Native sizes were analyzed via size exclusion chromatography on a HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 75 pg (GE Healthcare, Germany) using 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, with 300 mM NaCl at a flow rate of 1 ml min−1 with an ÄKTA purifier (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, UK). Calibration was performed with standard proteins of known sizes (RNase A, 13,700 Da; carbonic anhydrase, 29,000 Da; conalbumin, 75,000 Da; aldolase, 158,000 Da; blue dextran; Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) under similar conditions. The resulting standard curve was used for size determination of respective elution peaks of StyI and StyJ. Peak fractions were collected and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.
Final concentrations of pure proteins were calculated from the respective absorptions at 280 nm, applying molar extinction coefficients of 42,860 M−1 cm−1 (StyI) and 48,150 M−1 cm−1 (StyJ) as well as molecular weights of 29,836.3 g mol−1 (StyI) and 30,095.6 g mol−1 (StyJ) as predicted by Expasy ProtParam (56 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Oxidized RNA Cytidine Derivative Coupling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The oxidized RNA was dissolved in 250 µL water containing 20 mM imidazole (pH 8), 5 mM NaCNBH3, 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM cytidine derivative 1. The reaction was carried out at 37 °C. After 2 hours, 25 µL of 50 mM NaBH4 were added, and the reaction mixture was incubated for additional 15 min. Ethanol precipitation yielded the crude coupling product, which was analyzed by reversed-phase HPLC on an Äkta Purifier (Amersham Bioscience). Column: Macherey Nagel EC 250/4 Nucleodur 100-5 C18 ec; Buffers: (A) 0.1 M triethylammonium acetate (pH 7.0), 5% acetonitrile and (B) 0.1 M triethylammonium acetate (pH 7.0), 30% acetonitrile; flow rate 0.5 mL min−1; gradient: 0% → 85% (B) in 14 CV, 85% 4 CV, 85% → 100% (B), 100% (B) 4 CV, 100% → 0% (B) 2 CV. The product containing fraction was collected, RNA was lyophilized and analyzed by MALDI–MS: (calcd mass: 7339.9 g/mol, found: 7339.04 [M + 1]+; 3668.515 [M + 2]+/2, Supporting Information File 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analysis of Purified Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The molecular masses of the purified proteins in a denatured state were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (53 (link), 54 ). Immunodetection of the His10-tagged proteins was performed via Western blotting (55 (link)) using a nitrocellulose blotting membrane (Amersham Protran 0.45-μm NC, GE Healthcare, Germany) and a Penta-His horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate antibody (Qiagen, Germany).
Native sizes were analyzed via size exclusion chromatography on a HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 75 pg (GE Healthcare, Germany) using 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, with 300 mM NaCl at a flow rate of 1 ml min−1 with an ÄKTA purifier (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, UK). Calibration was performed with standard proteins of known sizes (RNase A, 13,700 Da; carbonic anhydrase, 29,000 Da; conalbumin, 75,000 Da; aldolase, 158,000 Da; blue dextran; Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) under similar conditions. The resulting standard curve was used for size determination of respective elution peaks of StyI and StyJ. Peak fractions were collected and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.
Final concentrations of pure proteins were calculated from the respective absorptions at 280 nm, applying molar extinction coefficients of 42,860 M−1 cm−1 (StyI) and 48,150 M−1 cm−1 (StyJ) as well as molecular weights of 29,836.3 g mol−1 (StyI) and 30,095.6 g mol−1 (StyJ) as predicted by Expasy ProtParam (56 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Virus Purification by Ion Exchange

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clarification was performed by filtration through 8 m, 3-0.8 m and 0.45-0.22 m (Sartorius, USA) series of cellulose acetate membranes. Virus purification was performed by ion exchange chromatography (Äkta Purifier, Amersham Bioscience) yielding a purified batch named VINFLAP001/2010. Under operating conditions, the purifications steps are quite efficient, showing high product recovery and efficient DNA clearance as described before [12] . The level of host cell protein (HCP) was considered high indicating the need for targeting HCP in a subsequent step. Quantification of total proteins was carried out using the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce ® ) according to manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Production and Purification of rAAV1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
rAAV1 were produced by cotransfection of pTR-UF113 and pDP1-rs (Plasmid Factory—no. PF401) with PEI (Polyethylenimine—PolyScience—no. 23966-1) in adherent HEK-293 with DMEM (Gibco—no. 41966-029) supplemented with 10% FBS (Pan Biotech—no. P30-3031). Briefly, 72 h post-transfection, adherent cells were detached by addition of 12.5 mM final concentration of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) 0.5 M. Supernatant and cells were treated with 30 mM MgCl2, 0.5% Triton X-100 and 1 000 U (for 500 mL of bulk) of Benzonase (Roche—no. 1.01654-0001) for 3 h at 37°C under 140 rpm (orbital shaker—Heathrow Scientist).
Culture bulk was then clarified with a Pall Preflow filter (no. DFA3001UBC). rAAV1 were purified from the clarified product with Poros Go-Pure AAVX prepacked column (Thermo Fisher—no. A36652) and an Äkta purifier (Cytiva). rAAV1 were eluted with 100 mM Glycine buffer at pH 2.5 and neutralized with Tris pH 8.5. rAAV1 were concentrated with PBS supplemented with 625 mM KCl and 10 mM MgCl2 with an Amicon 100 kDa (Millipore—no. UFC910024).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Detergent Screening for Membrane Protein Solubilization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Membranes purified from yeast expressing His8-GFP-TEV-FICD were diluted to 2 mg/mL in Lysis Buffer 1 and supplemented with a detergent (see Table 1) at a final concentration of 2, 4 or 6 mg/mL. When indicated, CHS was included to one third of the detergent concentration. The mixtures were incubated at 4 °C for 1 h with gentle agitation. Insoluble material was collected by centrifugation at 160,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C. The solubilisation efficiency was estimated by measuring the GFP fluorescence (Fluoroskan Ascent, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; excitation at 485 nm and emission at 520 nm) in the soluble fraction before and after the centrifugation [32 (link)]. For FSEC, 350 μL of the solubilised membrane proteins were separated on a Superose 6 Increase 10/300 GL (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) column connected to an ÄKTA purifier (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) in SEC Buffer 1 (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.3 mg/mL DDM). An in-line fluorescence detector (Shimadzu RF-20A prominence, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) was used to record the elution of the GFP-tagged FICD. All detergents used for detergent screening were purchased from Affymetrix (Santa Clara, CA, USA) or GlyconBiochemicals (Luckenwalde, Germany) and are listed in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SEC-MALS Analysis of TPR-like Domain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 250 μl of purified TPR-like domain at 1–3 mg/ml were fractionated by SEC using a Superdex 200 10/300 column (Cytiva) equilibrated in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 0.2 M NaCl, 5% glycerol, and 1 mM DTT and an ÄKTA purifier (Cytiva) at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The eluted samples were characterized by measuring the refractive index and multi-angle light scattering (MALS), using Optilab T-rEX and DAWN 8+ (Wyatt). Data were analyzed using the Astra6 software (Wyatt) to obtain the molar mass of each protein and represented using GraphPad Prism 9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!