The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using dneasy column

1

Tissue DNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approximately 25 mg of tissue was removed from each sample and placed in 1.0 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution and incubated at room temperature for one hour. Samples were inverted frequently to wash the preservatives off the sample. The samples were washed twice, and the tissues were then transferred to 360 µl of ATL, a tissue lysis buffer provided in the Qiagen DNA extraction kit, and 40 µl of proteinase K incubated minimally overnight at 55°C to ensure complete digestion of the tissue. This process was repeated twice. After digestion 400 µl of the AL buffer provided in Qiagen kits was added and the samples inverted rapidly for 15 s to yield a homogeneous solution. DNA precipitation was carried out by adding an equal volume of cold 100% ethanol to the lysate. Samples were mixed thoroughly and incubated at 4°C for at least one hour. The ethanol/lysate mix was transferred to Qiagen DNeasy columns and centrifuged at 6000g for one minute to bind the DNA to the filter in the column. Columns were washed twice with Qiagen AW1 and AW2 buffers and allowed to dry. A 50 μl aliquot of elution buffer heated to 70°C was applied to the column and incubated at room temperature for one hour. A second elution step was carried out using the same protocol. This process yielded 100 μl of genomic DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nuclei Isolation from GBM Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anonymized tumor and matching blood specimens were collected following informed, written consent and processed under protocols approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Broad Institute (protocol 11–433). Two cases of de novo GBM, designated as brain tumor BT325 and BT340, were mechanically dissociated into pools of nuclei as previously described (24 (link)). A portion of the dissociated material was selected to represent bulk tumor. Genomic DNA was isolated from the pooled nuclei and matched blood using DNeasy columns (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

High-throughput DNA Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-throughput sequencing was performed on purified genomic DNA obtained on DNeasy columns (Qiagen) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States) with 100-base paired-end reads and barcodes within the Nextera XT kit (Illumina), used in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. De novo genome assembly and annotation were performed as previously described (Diene et al., 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Human MSC Engraftment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from the posterior retina of five eyes seven days after MSC transplant using DNeasy columns (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). 250 ng of this DNA was used in a quantitative PCR reaction using primers specific for human genomic DNA (forward: GAGAGCGTTTGGAAATTGGA, Reverse: TGGCTGCTGTTTCATGTCTC). Samples were amplified in a quantitative PCR reaction for 45 cycles using a CFX96 thermal cycler (BioRad, Hercules, CA). Data were compared against a standard curve was constructed using genomic DNA extracted from a known quantity of human MSC (17 to 16,750 cells). A positive control containing DNA from 1,675 MSC and a negative control (water only) were included. All measurements were taken in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Real-Time PCR for rAAV Vector Genomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total DNA was isolated from tissue samples using QIAGEN DNeasy columns. The DNA samples were assayed in duplicates by quantitative real-time PCR, using ABsolute Blue qPCR mix (Thermo Scientific) and an Applied Biosystems 7000 real-time PCR system, following the procedures recommended by the manufacturers. TaqMan primers specific for hSGSH were used to detect rAAV vector genomes as follows: forward, 5′-AAGTCAGCGAGGCCTACGT-3′; reverse, 5′-GATGGTCTTCGAGCCAAAGAT-3′; probe, 5′-(6-FAM)-CCTCCTAGACCTCACGCCCAC C-(TAMRA)-3′. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was quantified in parallel samples using mouse β-actin-specific primers as follows: forward, 5′-GTCATCACTAT TGGCAACGA-3′; reverse. 5′-CTCAGGA GTTTTGTCACCTT-3′, probe: 5′-(6-FAM)-TTCCGATG CCCTGAGGCTCT-(TAMRA)-3′. Serial diluted vector plasmid and mouse gDNA were used as standards. gDNA from tissues of non-treated mice were used as controls for background levels and absence of contamination. Data are expressed as vg/μg gDNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Baleen Whale Tissue Sampling and Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specimens were collected in the North and South Atlantic Oceans, the southwestern Indian Ocean, and the Southern Ocean. The latter three areas are collectively referred to as the Southern Ocean (Table 1).
Skin samples from free‐ranging baleen whales were collected using remote biopsy sampling techniques (Palsbøll et al., 1991 ). Additionally, some samples were obtained during necropsies from beached carcasses, fisheries bycatches as well as local subsistence or commercial whaling operations prior to the moratorium on commercial whaling in 1986. Tissue samples were preserved in 5 m NaCl with 20% dimethyl sulfoxide (Amos & Hoelzel, 1991 ) and stored at −20 or −80°C. Total‐cell DNA was extracted from tissue samples using either standard phenol and chloroform extraction processes (Sambrook et al., 1989 ) or DNeasy™ columns (Qiagen, Inc.) following the manufacturer's instructions.
Multi‐locus microsatellite genotypes (data not included) were employed to identify and remove duplicate samples collected from the same individual and to identify closely related individuals sampled in a non‐independent manner (e.g., mother and calf). Closely related individuals sampled at random, that is, during different sightings, were retained in the data set (Waples & Anderson, 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genomic DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted using DNeasy columns (Qiagen®, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturing instructions. The isolated DNA was quantified using Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific® Waltham, MA, USA) and biophotometer (Eppendorf® D30). The quality of DNA was monitored through gel electrophoreses. Complete 16S RNA gene sequencing of selected bacterial strains was done by Sanger method (Institute of Parasitology and Biomedicine “López-Neyra” IPBLN Service). Forward and reverse sequences were provided separately. Reverse sequence was converted to complementary sequence with Chromas Pro 2.0 software (Technelysium Pty Ltd., Tewantin, Australia). Sequences were examined for maximum homology against GenBank using National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI’s BLASTn program. The collection and comparison of complete 16S rRNA gene sequences were performed using the Ezbiocloud platform [40 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Lentiviral Integrations in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure lentiviral integrations in the host cell genome, we transduced MDA-MB-468 cells (grown in DMEM/10% FBS) with twelve 2 × serial dilutions of CMV-H2b-GFP virus, diluted in M87 medium. After overnight incublation, the medium was refreshed with regular growth medium, DMEM/10% FBS. At 3 days post innoculation, the cells were photographed, dissociated and the GFP+ fractions were measured and FACS sorted into either 6, 24, 48 or 96-well dishes (dependent on transduction efficiency per cell yield). After expansion in culture for 1 week, DNA was isolated (DNEasy columns, Qiagen) from cultures derived from dilutions 1–9 (which had accumulated enough cells at that time). Viral integrations in genomic DNA were measured by qPCR using primers specific to the lentiviral GAG sequence (For: 5′- AGG GAG CTA GAA CGA TTC GCA GTT -3′, Rev: 5′- TCT GAT CCT GTC TGA AGG GAT GGT -3′), Lentiviral gene dose was normalized to the single copy gene, albumin42 (link), (FOR: 5′- TGT AGA GAA GTG CTG CAA GGC TGA -3′, REV:5′- TGT CCC ACA TGT ACA AAG CCT CCT -3′). PCR reactions (45 cycles: 95 °C × 15 s, 60 °C × 60 s) were performed in quadruplicate and quantified using the ddCT method; error was propagated using the square root of the sum of squares method and values are expressed as a percentage of albumin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genome Sequencing of Dairy Goat Breeds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The resequenced animals used in this study consisted of five dairy goat breeds, including three European dairy goat breeds, namely Saanen dairy goats (N = 25), Toggenburg dairy goats (N = 27), and Alpine dairy goats (N = 16), and two Chinese indigenous dairy goat breeds, Guanzhong dairy goats (N = 19) and Laoshan dairy goats (N = 23). Genomic DNA from these 110 goats was extracted from ear punches (preserved in ethanol, -20 degrees Celsius) using Qiagen DNeasy columns (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was quantified using a Qubit fluorometer, and the quality was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. Sequencing libraries were prepared and barcoded using the TruSeq sample preparation kit. The libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform using the 150 bp paired-end sequencing strategy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Tobacco RNA Extraction with MoBio PowerSoil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleic acids were extracted from tobacco products using the MoBio PowerSoil Total RNA isolation kit (MO BIO Laboratories Inc.; Carlsbad, CA, USA) combined with the RNA PowerSoil DNA elution accessory kit (QIAGEN Inc.; Chatsworth, CA), with a few modifications. Modifications included using the MPBio Lysing matrix E (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) in lieu of the bead-beating tubes from the PowerSoil kit, and the addition of a final cleanup step using QIAGEN DNEasy columns. RNA yield was quantified using a Qubit 2.0 with the RNA HS Assay (Thermo Fisher; Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!