The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

79 protocols using biocoat matrigel

1

Transwell Assay for Cell Migration and Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The capacity of cells migration and invasion was evaluated via transwell assay. The upper chamber was pre-coated with BioCoat Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for invasion assay, whereas migration assay was not pre-coated with BioCoat Matrigel. Subsequently, 200 μl cells were seeded into upper chamber which mixed with serum-free medium, 500 μl DMEM medium containing 10% FBS was added into the lower chamber. After 24 h incubation, cells on the upper chamber surface were removed using cotton swabs. Cells on the lower surface were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.5% crystal violet. Finally, NIS Elements image software (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) was used to detect the number of migrating and invading cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transwell Assay for Cell Migration and Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The capacity of cells migration and invasion was evaluated via transwell assay. The upper chamber was pre-coated with BioCoat Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for invasion assay, whereas migration assay was not pre-coated with BioCoat Matrigel. Subsequently, 200 μl cells were seeded into upper chamber which mixed with serum-free medium, 500 μl DMEM medium containing 10% FBS was added into the lower chamber. After 24 hours incubation, cells on the upper chamber surface were removed using cotton swabs. Cells on the lower surface were xed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.5% crystal violet. Finally, NIS Elements image software (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) was used to detect the number of migrating and invading cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (5 × 104) received the suspending process within serum-free DMEM and then the addition into chambers (8 mm, BD Biosciences) under the coating of BD BioCoat Matrigel. When the incubating process was achieved, by employing one cotton tip, the cells onto the surface of the upper membrane received the removal. The RPMI 1640 medium involving 10% FBS received the addition into the bottom chamber. Cells under the migrating or invading process within the bottom chamber received the 0.1% crystal violet-based staining process. Cells were then counted under an optical microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transwell Migration and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The transwell (Corning) experiment was performed to assess the migration capacity of cells after manipulating 14-3-3ζ. Briefly, cells were serum starved for 12 h and resuspended at a final concentration of 2 × 104 cells/ml with serum-free RPMI-1640 media (Corning). Cells were seeded into the upper chamber and RPMI-1640 media with 10% FBS was added in the lower chamber. After incubation for 24 h, migrated cells which penetrated the membrane were fixed with 10% methanol for 30 min and stained with Giemsa (Sigma), whereas cells on the upper surface of the membrane were carefully removed by cotton swabs. Migrated cells were counted under a light microscope at 100× magnification. For the cell invasion assay, the polycarbonate membrane was coated with 100 μl Matrigel (BD BioCoat Matrigel). The following assay was similar to that described in the transwell migration assay. All experiments were repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Matrigel Invasion Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The indicated cells were seeded in a membrane supracavity with a pore diameter of 8 μm at 80,000–100000 cells per well. The liquid in the upper chamber was 200μL of DMEM/F12 medium (CORNING), and the liquid in the basement chamber was 600μL of DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% FBS. The upper chamber fluid was mixed with BD Biocoat Matrigel (BD Biosciences) with DMEM/F12 medium (1:8) for matrigel invasion assays. After 12 or 24 h, the chambers were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 60 min, stained with crystalline violet for 30 min, and then photographed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Cell Invasion Potential

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (5 × 104) were suspended in serum-free DMEM and added to chambers (8 mm, BD Biosciences) coated with BD BioCoat Matrigel. Subsequently, 5 × 104 cells underwent the 4% paraformaldehyde-based fixing process, 0.5% Troxin X-100 based incubating process, as well as 1 × Apollo® 488 fluorescent staining. For determining EdU-positive cells' percentage within 5 random fields in the respective well, this study employed fluorescent microscopy (Nikon, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scratch Assay and Transwell Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scratch assay, cells were cultured in a six-well plate till a confluent monolayer was formed. A scratch was made through the center of the well with a tip and images were recorded before and after activin-A treatment. Transwell migration and invasion assays were performed following the manufacturer’s protocol, using BD BioCoat Matrigel (NJ, USA) invasion/control chambers. The experiments were performed in triplicates and repeated two independent times. The images were recorded under a microscope with a fixed camera (×2 magnification) and cells were counted from several random fields.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell Migration and Invasion Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wound healing assay and transwell assay were used to assess cell migration and invasion, respectively. Briefly, for wound healing assay, cells seeded in six-well plates were cultured to 90% confluence. The monolayer cells were manually scraped using a 10-uL sterile pipette tip. The wounding scratches at 24 hr was measured and expressed as the relative percentage of the initial distance at 0 hr following formula: migration rate = migration distance/original distance. For transwell assay, cells (5×104) were suspended in serum-free DMEM and added to chambers (8 mm, BD Biosciences) coated with BD BioCoat Matrigel. After incubation, the cells on the upper membrane surface were removed with a cotton tip. Then, the member was fixed and stained by violet crystalline.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transwell Assay for Cell Migration and Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both cell migration and invasion were performed using the Transwell assay. For cell migration assay, 6  ×  104 U251 cells were seeded in a serum-free medium in the upper chamber, which contained a polyethylene terephthalate membrane (with 6.5 mm in diameter and 8 μm in pore size). The bottom chamber was prepared with 10% FBS as a chemoattractant. After incubating at 37°C for 24 h, nonmigrated cells were scraped from the upper surface of the membrane with a cotton swab, and the cells migrating to the bottom chamber were fixed with paraformaldehyde and stained with crystal violet. Finally, the stained cells were counted under a microscope at  × 400 magnification in five randomly selected fields for quantification.
For cell invasion assay, 5 × 104 U251 cells were suspended in 200 mL of serum-free DMEM and then treated using the same procedure as for the migration assay following the manufacturer’s protocol, but the chambers (8 mm, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) were plated with BD BioCoat Matrigel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Matrigel-Based Cell Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BD BioCoat Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA) was diluted at a ratio of 1:8 and used to coat the Transwell chambers (Corning, USA). The cells were starved for 12 h, trypsinized, and resuspended in serum‐free medium containing bovine serum albumin. Then, 100 μl of the cell suspension (1 × 105 cells) was added to the Transwell chambers, and 600 μl of the medium containing 20% foetal bovine serum was added to the lower chambers. After a 24‐h incubation, the cells that passed through the Matrigel were fixed with 20% methanol. After crystal violet staining for 15 min, the cells were counted and photographed under a microscope (IX73, OLYMPUS, Japan) in three random fields.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!