The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Vantage m

Manufactured by Polar Electro
Sourced in Finland, Norway

The Vantage M is a portable heart rate monitor designed for lab and research applications. It provides continuous heart rate data and supports wireless data transmission.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using vantage m

1

Quantifying Physical Activity and Sleep

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nighttime sleep and physical activity during the entire day were assessed using Polar devices (models A370, M430, M600, Vantage V, and Vantage M). These wrist-worn devices use validated proprietary algorithms to automatically translate biosignals into PA and sleep–wake metrics [14 (link), 15 (link)]. For the purpose of the present study, derived sleep metrics included total sleep duration (calculated as the duration of time between sleep onset and offset, excluding wakefulness within that period), and sleep efficiency (calculated as the percent of total sleep duration out of the duration of time between sleep onset and offset). Sleep efficiency calculation thus does not include the sleep latency period and was used as a measure of sleep quality [16 (link)].
Physical activity levels were quantified per 30-s epochs and classified into one of the following categories: (1) moderate physical activity, with metabolic equivalent (MET) values between 2.95–5.95; (2) vigorous physical activity, with MET values between 5.95–8.75; or (3) near maximal physical activity, with MET values ≥ 8.75 [17 ]. In the present study, we used two PA variables, one including all activity from the moderate level upwards (MVPA) and one including activity from the vigorous level upwards (VPA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Simulated Competitive Padel Match Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Given the difficulties of analyzing acute neuromuscular and physiological parameters during WPT matches, SC was designed. The SC characteristics appear in Table 2. SC consisted of organizing a padel match to reproduce a competitive situation similar to an official one and in line with International Padel Federation rules [23 ]. Matches were played on an open-air court. Players’ training intensity and volume were reduced in the 2 days before SC to reduce fatigue.
SC was organized in accordance with the official regulations for professional tournaments, and all the matches were played with the best of three sets [23 ]. Matches ended in a tie break if there was a tie after six games. Before starting SC, players did a standard 15-min warm up divided into a 5-min movement and general warm up session and a 10-min specific technical warm up on the court. Players were monitored during SC by pulsometers (Vantage M, Polar, Finland). During matches, what the players drank was controlled. Drinks consisted of bottled mineral water. Players could drink ad libitum during matches.
The total time was the full match time, from the time it began to the time it ended and included game and rest periods. Real time was the time from when a point began (when the serving player hit the ball) until the end. Rest time was from the end of one point to the beginning of the next point [10 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cardiovascular Evaluation in Strength and Sauna

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as heart rate were evaluated using a pulsometer (Polar, Vantage M, Kempele, Filand) and a digital arm tensiometer (Visomat; comfort 20/40, Külsheim, Germany). These cardiovascular evaluations were performed in resting conditions and after the strength test. On the second day, the cardiovascular evaluations were performed under resting conditions, after the sauna bath and after the strength test. All measurements were performed on the left arm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

VO2 max Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A running test on a treadmill (Powerjoc, UK) equipped with a gas analyzer (Metamax, Cortex Biophysik Gmbh, Germany) and a Polar pulsometer (Polar Vantage M, Norway) was used to evaluate the maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max). All the tests were performed between 10 and 12 a.m. Exercise test consisted of a 10 min warm-up at 10 km/h followed by incremental runs until voluntary exhaustion, starting at 10 km/h and increasing it by 1 km/h every 400 m, with a stable slope of 1%. During the incremental test, VO2 max was determined according to the following criteria: the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) had to exceed 1; stabilization in oxygen uptake (VO2) together with an increment in carbon dioxide (CO2) elimination and in the ventilatory volume (VE), induced by the increases in the test velocity.
After recording the test data, the ventilatory thresholds were determined according to the three-phase model to monitor training [30 (link)]. The data were obtained at the aerobic threshold (VT1) and the anaerobic threshold (VT2) to determine training load intensity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Incremental Treadmill Test for Physical Performance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One week before SC, a maximum progressive test was run in the laboratory on a treadmill (Pulsar HP, Cosmos, Nussdorf, Germany) to determine the physical performance parameters. This test was performed at a 1% slope, starting at a speed of 8 km·h−1 and incorporating 1 km·h−1 increments every minute. Before strength testing began, the participants warmed up on a treadmill at the speed of 6 km·h−1 for 5 min. Gases were analyzed by an Oxycon Pro analyzer (Jaegger, Germany). A pulsometer (Vantage M, Polar, Finland) was used to evaluate the maximum heart rate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating VO2max and Performance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An incremental test until exhaustion was performed on a treadmill (Sport engineering limited, Powerjog, Birmingham, UK) and an ergospirometer system equipped with a gas analyzer (Metamax, Cortex Biophysik, Gmbh, Leipzig, Germany) to measure the athletes’ VO2 max. scores and performance, the validity and reliability of which have been established previously [26 (link)]. A Polar pulsometer (Polar Vantage M, Norway) was used to evaluate the maximum heart rate.
After a 10 min warm-up at 8–10 km/h, the athletes initiated the test at a speed of 10 km/h, which increased by 1 km/h every 400 m until voluntary exhaustion. VO2 max. was determined with breath-by-breath data according to the following criteria: the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) had to exceed 1, there had to be a plateau in oxygen uptake (VO2), an increment in carbon dioxide (CO2) elimination and an increment in the ventilatory volume (VE) induced by the increases in the test velocity [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Physical Performance on Treadmill

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to determine the corresponding physical performance values, a progressive and maximum laboratory test was done on a treadmill (Pulsar, h/p/cosmos®, Nussdorf, Germany). The test was run on a 1% slope and began at a speed of 8 km/h, which increased 1 km/h every minute. Before the test began, the participants warmed up for 5 min on the treadmill operating at a speed of 6 km.h−1. Respired gases were collected with an Oxycon Pro analyzer (Erich Jaeger GmbH, Hoechberg, Germany). A pulsometer (Vantage M, Polar, Finland) was used to evaluate the maximal heart rate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Incremental Treadmill Ergospirometric Test

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects performed an incremental ergospirometric test on a treadmill (Ergofit Trac Alpin 4000, Germany). The test started with a warm-up at 8 km/h for 10 min and was increased by 1 km/h every two minutes until voluntary exhaustion. The tests were carried out in the laboratory with ambient conditions of 23 ± 2 °C (45–55% relative humidity). Physiological ergospirometric parameters were monitored with a gas analyser (Metamax model no. 762014-102, Cortex, Germany), and heart rate (HR) was monitored with a pulsometer (Polar®Vantage M”, Kempele, Finland) with sensor band (Polar® H10, Kempele, Finland). All tests were performed from 11:30 a.m. onwards in the same order to avoid the effects of circadian cycles.
After recording the test data, the ventilatory thresholds were determined according to the three-phase model [32 (link)]. The data were obtained at the aerobic threshold (VT1), the anaerobic threshold (VT2), maximum values of the incremental test and after three minutes of recovery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Aerobic Capacity Evaluation in Runners

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After taking anthropometric measurements, to measure the runners’ ergospirometric parameters and performance, they carried out an incremental test until exhaustion on a treadmill (Powerjog, Birmingham, UK) with an ergospirometer system equipped with a gas analyser (Metamax, Cortex Biophysik, Germany). A pulsometer (Vantage M, Polar, Finland) was used to evaluate the maximal heart rate.
After a 10 min warm-up, the runners initiated the test at a speed of 10 km/h, which increased by 1 km/h every 400 m until voluntary exhaustion. VO2 max was determined according to the following criteria: there had to be a plateau in oxygen uptake (VO2), an increment in carbon dioxide (CO2) elimination, and an increment in the ventilatory volume (VE) induced by the increases in the test velocity and the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) had to exceed 1 [23 (link)]. The aerobic threshold (VT1) and VT2 were determined according to the three-phase model to monitor training [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Periodization and Training Monitoring in Cross-Country and Track Athletes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Figure 1 details the timeline of periodization and testing during the season. Athletes had a four-week adaptation before the initial measurement (October), where they performed 85.71 ± 13.62 km per week and a four-week transition period after the second competitive period. The first preparatory period began in October through December and the second one during March through May. Competitive periods were coincident with January and February when the athletes performed cross country competitions (10,000–12,000 m approximately), and the second competitive period was in June-July when they performed track and field competitions between 1500 and 5000 m. A GPS pack equipped with pulsometers (Polar Vantage M. Norway) was used to track the training loads during the season.
Table 1 summarizes training characteristics in the athletes. In addition, they performed two weekly sessions of resistance training during the whole athletics season. In general, the volume of the training was high (3 sets of 8–12 repetitions of whole-body exercises) while the intensity was low-moderate (30–70% of 1RM) depending on the period of the season.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!