The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4000 qtrap mass spectrometer

Manufactured by AB Sciex
Sourced in United States, Japan, Canada, United Kingdom, Germany

The 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer is a versatile analytical instrument designed for qualitative and quantitative analysis. It combines the capabilities of a triple quadrupole and a linear ion trap, enabling high-performance tandem mass spectrometry. The system is equipped with advanced features for precise mass measurement, high sensitivity, and reliable data acquisition.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

72 protocols using 4000 qtrap mass spectrometer

1

Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Triacylglycerol Hydroperoxide Isomers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Q1 mass and product ion mass spectra in the TG 18:1_18:1_18:1;OOH isomer mixture were obtained using a 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer (SCIEX, Tokyo, Japan). Standard TG 18:1_18:1_18:1;OOH was diluted in methanol (0.5 µM) and directly infused into the MS at a flow rate of 10 µL/min. Positive ESI was used as the ion source. MS spectra were obtained in a range of m/z 100–1000. Analytical parameters were optimized using the Analyst software (ver. 1.6.2, SCIEX, Tokyo, Japan) (Supplementary Materials).
TG 18:1_18:1_18:2;OOH and TG 18:1_18:1_18:1;OOH isomers were analyzed in multiple-reaction-monitoring (MRM) mode. The MRM transitions described in the Supplementary Materials were used. LC-MS/MS analysis was conducted using an ExionLC HPLC system (SCIEX, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer. An Inertsil SIL-100A column (5 µm, 2.1 × 250 mm, GL Sciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was eluted with hexane/2-propanol/acetic acid (100:0.6:0.5, v/v/v) at 0.2 mL/min (40 °C). A post-column solvent consisting of methanol/2-propanol (1:1, v/v) containing 0.2 mM sodium acetate was mixed with the eluent at 0.2 mL/min to promote ionization [29 (link)]. TG 18:1_18:1_18:2;OOH and TG 18:1_18:1_18:1;OOH isomers were quantitated with external standard curves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Liver Metabolites Using UPLC-MRM/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To quantify metabolites of central carbon metabolism (CCM) in mouse liver, we used UPLC-MRM/MS, a Dionex 3400 UHPLC system (Dionex Sunnyvale, CA, USA) coupled to a 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA). Liver metabolites were extracted and quantified including those from tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, glucose and selected sugar phosphates, and other phosphate-containing metabolites and nucleotides (Tables S4 and S5). Concentrations of the detected metabolites were calculated from internal linear-regression calibration curves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Phospholipid Profiling by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extracted phospholipid fraction was diluted 1000-fold with methanol, and 1 µL of the solution was subjected to liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS consisting of ExionLC system (SCIEX, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer (SCIEX). Separation was performed by isocratic elution with methanol/water (95:5, v/v) on a COSMOSIL Packed Column (5C18-MS-II, 5 μm, 2.0 ID × 250 mm, Nacalai Tesque Inc., Kyoto, Japan) at 45 °C. The flow rate was 0.2 mL/min. By mixing the column eluate with sodium acetate solution19 (link), PC was detected as Na+ adduct in Q1 mass scan mode. Abundant PC molecular species were selected based on a Q1 mass scan, and their constituent fatty acids were determined by a product ion scan in direct infusion. The instruments were operated by Analyst software (ver. 1.7.2). The MS parameters are shown in Table S1 of Supplementary Material.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolite Profiling by UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolite measurements were performed by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) on an Agilent 1290 UHPLC system coupled to a Sciex 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer. For sample preparation, 45 μl of each sample was mixed with 105 μl of acetonitrile. After vortex mixing for 15 s and sonication in an ice-water bath for 1 min, the samples were centrifuged (14,000 x g, 10 min, 4 °C). The supernatants were used for quantitation of the metabolites using two different UPLC-MRM/MS methods, as described13 (link) (Supplementary file 1, Supplementary methods).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mass Spectrometry Analysis Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were collected on a 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer (Sciex, Toronto, Canada) equipped with a home-built nanoESI source. The characteristic parameters of the mass spectrometer using in this study were set as follows: spray voltage, ± 1200 – ± 1500 V; curtain gas, 10 psi; and declustering potential, ± 40 V. Data acquisition, processing, and instrument control were performed using Analyst 1.5 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Targeted Metabolomics of Cellular Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellular extracts were analyzed using the “AbsoluteIDQ p150 Kit” (Biocrates, Innsbruck, Austria). Briefly, samples were prepared as follows: (a) pipetting of 10 µl cell extract onto the filter inserts of the 96-well plate of the kit (containing internal standards labeled with stable isotopes), (b) drying of samples under a nitrogen stream, (c) extraction of metabolites and internal standards with 5 mM ammonium acetate in methanol, (d) centrifugation through the membrane filter provided, and (e) dilution with solvent for mass spectrometry. The final extracts were then randomized and analyzed using a 4000 QTrap mass spectrometer (Sciex) equipped with a TurboIonSpray source and coupled to an Agilent 1100 Series HPLC. Standard flow injection comprised two 20 µl injections (one for positive and one for negative electrospray ionization mode), and MRM was used for quantification as described earlier (27 (link)). Data were subsequently analyzed using the MetIQ software package (Biocrates, Innsbruck, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Serum Bile Acid Metabolome Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum bile acid metabolome was quantified using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) methods. An Ultimate 3000 RSLC system (Dionex; Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to a 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer via a TurboIonSpray electrospray ionization (SCIEX, Toronto, Canada) was operated in the negative ion mode. A BEH C18 (2.1 × 150 mm, 1.7 μm) UHPLC column (Waters Corp., Milford, MA) was used for the gradient elution, with 0.01% formic acid in water (solvent A) and 0.01% formic acid in acetonitrile (solvent B) as the mobile phase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of TPPU in Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentration of TPPU in blood was determined as described.56 (link) In short, 10 μL blood was collected and added into 50 μL 0.1% EDTA water solution. Samples were analyzed by multiple reaction-monitoring modes on the 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer (Sciex, Framingham, MA) and referenced to an internal standard. The optimized parameters of mass spectrometers for monitoring this sEH inhibitor are described as follows: transition from first quadrupole to third quadrupole was 358.2 to 175.9 mass-to-charge ratio, declustering potential was -125 V, entrance potential was -10 V, collision energy was -22 eV, collision cell exit potential was -11 V, and LOD was ≤0.49 nmol/L.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Bile Acids in Liver

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses of bile acids was performed by Creative Proteomics Metabolomics (Shirley, NY) on flash frozen liver of liver-humanized mice. Method was provided by Creative Proteomics Metabolomics. An Agilent 1290 UHPLC system coupled to a Sciex 4000 Qtrap mass spectrometer was used. The MS instrument was operated in the multiple reaction monitoring mode with negative-ion detection. A Waters BEH C18 column (2.1 × 150 mm, 1.7 μm) was used and the mobile phase was (A) 0.01% formic acid in water and (B) 0.01% formic acid in acetonitrile for binary-solvent gradient elution. A mixture of standard substances containing all the targeted BAs was dissolved in 80% methanol to have a concentration of 20 μΜ for each bile acid. This solution was further diluted step by step at a same dilution ratio of 1 to 4 (v/v) with the same solvent to have 10-point calibration solutions. In all, 100 μL of each solution was then mixed with an equal volume of an internal standard (IS) solution containing 14 D-labeled bile acids. In all, 10 μL of each resultant solution was injected to run UPLC-ESI-MS/MS with the scheduled MRM. Linear regression calibration curves were constructed with the analyte-to-internal standard peak area ratios (As/Ai) versus molar concentrations (nmol/mL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Mycotoxin Metabolites in Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DON, ZEN and their respective metabolites were determined in heparinized plasma (S-Monovette®, Lithium-Heparin, Sarstedt AG & Co., Sarstedt, Germany) collected at day 71 (end of trial). Samples were measured with HPLC-MS/MS, using an Agilent 1200 series HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Böblingen, Germany) coupled to a 4000 QTrap mass spectrometer (SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA) described in Paulick et al. (2015b (link)). Analysis of DON, de-epoxy-DON (DOM-1), ZEN and its metabolites was performed according to Brezina et al. (2014 (link)) and of DONS1, 2 and 3 as described by Paulick et al. (2018 (link)). Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) in plasma are provided in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!