The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Vmp 300

Manufactured by Bio-Logic
Sourced in France

The VMP-300 is a multi-channel potentiostat/galvanostat designed for electrochemical research and analysis. It provides precise control and measurement of electrochemical parameters such as current, voltage, and impedance. The VMP-300 is capable of supporting a wide range of electrochemical techniques, enabling users to conduct various experiments and measurements.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using vmp 300

1

Fabrication and Characterization of Lithium-ion Electrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The working
electrodes were fabricated by mixing the TO or RTO powders with super
P and polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF, Mw 27500, Sigma-Aldrich) with
a mass ratio of 70:20:10. The active materials were milled with super
P in an agate mortar, and the mixtures were subsequently transferred
to N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP, ≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich)
solution where PVDF was dissolved. Ultrasonication was applied to
ensure good dispersion of the mixed powders. The mixed slurry was
cast on Cu foil and dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 12 h.
The mass loading of active materials was ∼1.0 mg cm–2. The half-cells were fabricated in a glovebox where the active materials
were combined with lithium metal (99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich) and a glass
fiber separator (ECC1-01-0012-B/L). The applied electrolyte was composed
of 1 M LiPF6 in a 1:1 ratio v/v ethylene carbonate/dimethyl
carbonate (Sigma-Aldrich, battery grade). As for the operando XRD
cell, the mass ratio of the mixed slurry was changed to 50:40:10 to
achieve an enhanced electronic conductivity, and the beryllium window
was employed as the current collector. All electrochemical measurements
were performed in a galvanostat/potentiostat (VMP-300, Biologic) with
EC-Lab software at room temperature using commercial lab-scale cells
(TU Delft), while the operando cell was an optical test cell from
EL-CELL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy of Solid Polymer Electrolytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After assembly, the cells were
taken out of the glovebox, placed in a climatic chamber (Clima Temperatur
Systeme), and connected to a multipotentiostat with impedance capabilities
(VMP300, BioLogic). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was
performed in the frequency range of 7 MHz down to 0.1 Hz (and 100
μHz for reversible Li/Li-based cells) using an excitation voltage
between 10 and 200 mV depending on the impedance of the cell. The
use of high excitation signal enabled the reduction of noise for the
large impedance measurements especially when the temperature was low;
however, the linearity of the impedance answer was always checked.
When OS was used as the SPE, the chamber temperature
was varied from −30 to 100 °C with a temperature program
by 10 °C steps as follows: (i) heat from room temperature to
100 °C, (ii) cool to −30 °C and (iii) finally heat
to 100 °C. With PEO/LiTFSI-xM as the SPE, the
same sequence was used in between 10 and 100 °C with temperature
steps of 5 °C between 60 and 100 °C, where the PEO is in
a melted state, and steps of 10 °C below 60 °C. EIS spectra
were recorded after temperature stabilization of the cells, i.e.,
when the EIS spectra reach a steady state. The temperature was measured
with a thermocouple type k located close to the cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electrochemical Characterization of Vanadium Oxide Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The electrochemical measurements of the as-prepared active materials were performed according to previously reported procedures [49 (link)]. Specifically, CR2032-type coin cells were assembled in an argon-filled glove box with the contents of moisture and oxygen less than 0.5 ppm. 70 wt% of the product (e.g., V2O5@FeOOH-1, FeOOH, and V2O5·nH2O) was mixed with 20 wt% multiwalled carbon nanotube and 10 wt% polyvinylidene difluoride into NMP to prepare the working electrode. The as-obtained slurry was uniformly pasted on the Cu foil with a mass loading of about 1 mg cm−2 and dried under vacuum at 60°C for 24 h to remove the solvent. For the LIBs test, the lithium metal foil was used as the counter/reference electrode, 1.0 M LiPF6 dissolved into a mixture of ethylene carbonate (EC), dimethyl carbonate (DMC), and ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) (EC/DMC/EMC, 1 : 1 : 1, v/v/v) was used as electrolyte, and Celgard 2400 membrane was used as the separator. The galvanostatic charge-discharge tests at various current densities were conducted with a battery testing system (NEWARE, CT-4008) under a voltage range of 0.01 to 3.0 V. The CV curves were obtained on a Bio-logic (VMP-300) electrochemical workstation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Electrochemical Performance Evaluation of Ni-CuO Nanoarrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The electrochemical performance was measured in a three‐electrode system at an electrochemical workstation (Bio‐logic VMP‐300, France) with an Ag/AgCl and a carbon rod as reference and counter electrodes, respectively. The as‐prepared self‐supported electrodes directly served as the working electrode. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was conducted at a scan rate of 2 mV s−1 and voltages were 95% iR corrected. CV tests were carried out between voltage of 0.15 and 0.25 V (versus Ag/AgCl electrode) with different scan rates (10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 mV s−1) to obtain Cdl. The durability of Ni‐CuO NAs/CF was evaluated by CV tests (0.2‐0.8 V versus Ag/AgCl with a scan rate of 100 mV s−1) and chronoamperometry. The Ag/AgCl scale can be transformed into the RHE scale by the formula ERHE = EAg/AgCl + 0.197 + 0.059 × pH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Structural Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crystalline phase structure was determined by X‐ray diffractometry (XRD, Bruker D8 Advance, Cu Kα radiation) ranged from 10° to 80° (0.02° 2θ step, 6° min−1). In situ XRD data were performed by using X‐ray diffractometry coupled with electrochemical workstation (Bio‐Logic, VMP‐300). The microstructure, morphology, and chemical compositions of the samples were characterized by SEM (JEOL JSM‐7800F) and TEM (JEM‐2100 Plus, JEM‐F200) equipped with EDS. Surface chemical composition data were obtained from XPS (ThermoFisher Scientific, ESCALAB 250Xi).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Electrochemical Characterization of Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CV, LSV, CA and CP testing was performed in a conventional three-electrode setup with a Pt counter electrode, Ag/AgCl reference electrode (3.5 M KCl filling solution) and 1 M aqueous KOH solution (J. T. Baker) as the electrolyte, using a BioLogic VMP 300 potentiostat. Voltammograms were performed in the range 0–1 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) at 5 mV s−1 scan rate. The in situ experimental setup involved the use of a magnetic mount Raman electrochemical flow cell (Redox. Me) with a sapphire window with a Gamry Reference 600 potentiostat. The potentials measured vs. Ag/AgCl were mathematically converted to potential vs. reference hydrogen electrode (RHE) using the following equation:where is the saturated EAg/AgCl electrode potential equal to 0.197 V at 25 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Lithium-Sulfur Battery with S@SWNT Electrode

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The S@SWNT electrode was directly used as the working electrode to perform batteries with 2032 coin cells. Li metal was used as counter and reference electrodes. The separator film used was SbNs/separator. (For comparison, coin cells assembled with commercial separator, graphene coated separator and Sb coated separator were also prepared.) The electrolyte was 1 M lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in 1 : 1 v/v 1,2-dimethoxyethane and 1,3-DOL containing LiNO3 (1 wt%). The coin cells were assembled in a glove box (MBRAUN LABMASTER 130) filled with high pure Ar, where both moisture and oxygen levels were kept below 0.1 ppm. The galvanostatic charge–discharge tests were conducted at a voltage interval of 1.8–2.8 V. The specific capacity was calculated on the basis of the active S material. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were conducted at a scan rate of 0.2 mV s−1 on an electrochemical workstation (VMP-300, Bio-Logic). Electrochemical impedance spectrum (EIS) measurements were performed on the same electrochemical workstation in the frequency range from 100 kHz to 0.01 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Structural Analysis of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Structural and morphological properties were examined by (i) X-ray diffraction measurements (Bruker D8 Advance, λ = 1.542 Å), (ii) Raman spectroscopy (laser wavelength λ = 473.1 nm), (iii) X-ray photoelectronic spectrometry (model: VG Escalab 220i XL, Al Kα 1,2 polychromatic source = 1486.6 eV), (iv) scanning electron microscopy (Tescan Vega3 LMH) and (v) transmission electron microscopy (model: JEM 2100 F, 200 kV). The porosity was evaluated by nitrogen adsorption–desorption measurements (relative pressure P/P0: from 0.0 to 1.0) using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis (BET: Quantachrome), and the specific surface area was determined by BET theory. The electrochemical study was performed using a Biologic VMP 300 instrument, reference electrode (Ag/AgCl: 3 M KCl saturated), and platinum plate counter electrode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Coin Cell Assembly for Lithium Electrochemical Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Circular cathodes of 15 mm in diameter were punched using a heavy-duty disk cutter (MTI xlt), vacuum-dried for 12 h at 70 °C, and transferred into an Ar-filled glovebox for coin cell assembly (CR2025). Lithium disks of 16 mm cut from lithium ribbons (Sigma Aldrich, 0.75 mm thick) were used as counter and reference electrodes. Glass microfiber filter disks (Whatman, GF/D, 16 mm diameter) were used as separators. For each cell, 130 µL of electrolyte. Coin cells were pressed at 1000 kg cm−2 using a hydraulic crimping machine (MTI xlt) and aged for 24 h before testing. Electrochemical measurements were performed on a Biologic VMP300.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Electrochemical Characterization of Li-Ion Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EL-CELL were used to assemble the electrodes in an argon filled gloved box by using lithium foil as counter electrode, lithium wire as reference and 1 M LiFP6 in a EC:DMC (50:50) as electrolyte. Cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic charge-discharge experiments were performed in a potential range of 1.2 to 2 V and 1.2 to 3 V vs Li+/Li, respectively. All the measurements were performed in a BioLogic VMP 300.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!