The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

565 protocols using spss for windows version 17

1

Diclofenac and Postoperative Pain Syndrome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS for Windows version 17 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). All variables were investigated using visual (histograms, probability plots) and analytic methods (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) to determine whether or not they were normally distributed. Continuous variables were reported as means and standard deviation for normally distributed variables and as medians and interquartile range (IQR) for the non-normally distributed variables. Categorical variables were presented using numbers and percentages.
Patients were divided into two subgroups according to whether they received diclofenac or not. Comparison between two groups was performed using the χ2 and fisher exact test for qualitative variables, independent t-test for normally distributed continuous variables, and the Mann–Whitney U-test for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Patients were further categorized into two subgroups according to the presence or absence of PPS. A similar analysis to that earlier was made for PPS groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the associations between PPS and diclofenac administration. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Social Science program (SPSS for Windows, version 17; SPSS Inc., Chicago) for Windows 13.0 was used for all statistical analysis data. The variables analyzed by an independent t-test are presented as mean ± standard error (SEM). According to the results, as analyzed by the t-test, ∗∗p < 0.01 or p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis of the data was performed by using “Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) for Windows version 17” statistics software. Distribution normality of the data was checked using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov analysis. Continuous variables were represented as median (interquartile range) and categorical variables were represented as percentage (%).
The Mann–Whitney U test was used for the comparison of values determined by measurement, and Fisher’s exact test was used for the comparison of categorical variables. Binary logistic regression analysis of Wald backward elimination method was used to predict noncompletion adjusting variables. Test results were interpreted according to p = 0.05 significance level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Survival Outcomes: Age-Related Clinicopathologic Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The association of age (young and elderly) with clinicopathologic parameters was analyzed by the chi-squared (χ2) test. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Student's t-test. Survival curves were generated using Kaplan–Meier estimates; differences between the curves were analyzed by log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression models were built for analysis of risk factors for survival outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software package SPSS for Windows, version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results were considered statistically significant when a two-tailed test of a p value of less than 0.05 was achieved.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Continuous Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, version 17 (SPSS, USA). Continuous variables were compared using Student’s t-tests. The criterion for statistical significance used was P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Survival Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Age, sex, ethnicity, extension of primary tumor invasion, lymph nodes status, histological grade, survival time, and CSS were extracted from the SEER database. All cases were restaged according to the criteria described in the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (7th edition, 2010). Within the SEER database, marital status of the patient is recorded at the time of diagnosis. Marital status is coded as married, divorced, widowed, separated, and never married. Individuals in the separated and divorced group were clustered together as the divorced/separated group in this study.
Patient baseline characteristics were compared with the χ2 test, as appropriate. The rate of CRC death was compared between groups using the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression models were built for analysis of risk factors for survival outcomes. The primary endpoint of this study was CSS, which was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of cancer specific death. Deaths attributed to CRC were treated as events and deaths from other causes were treated as censored observations. All of statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software package SPSS for Windows, version 17 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was set at two-sided P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Prognostic Factors in Recurrence Survival

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The count data were expressed as n (%), t-test was used for comparison between two sets of normal-distribution continuous variables, and Mann–Whitney U two-sample rank-sum test was used for comparison of non-parametric data. Categorical data were compared using Pearson’s χ2 test. Survival curves, including PRS and PR-PFS, were constructed using the Kaplan-Meir method, and differences in groups were compared using the Log rank test. Prognostic factors for PRS were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, with age, gender, histology, initial pathological stage, regional lymph node recurrence, time to recurrence, as the candidate factors. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We used SPSS for Windows version 17 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) for statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Survival Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The χ2 test was adopted to analyze individuals’ basic characteristics appropriately. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the overall survival of CRC patients with the hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The confounding factors including gender, age, education (in quartiles), household income (in quartiles), and race/ethnicity were adjusted. Survival plots were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A 2-sided p value 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All analyses were performed using the statistical software package SPSS for Windows, version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Gastric Cancer Prognostic Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical variables were summarized using frequency (%). A comparison of the categorical variables between LNs count subgroups was conducted using Pearson's χ2 test. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method; differences between the curves were analyzed by the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess potential risk factors for CSS. Cox stepwise regression analysis was also performed to determine predictive factors for gastric cancer prognosis, with a significance level of 0.05 for entering and 0.10 for removing the respective explanatory variables. Nomograms for possible prognostic factors associated with CSS and OS were established by R software, and the model performance for predicting outcome was evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (c-index), which is a measure of discrimination.
All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software package SPSS for Windows, version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The results were considered statistically significant when a two-tailed test provided a P-value of less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The end point of the study was in-hospital mortality. Unless otherwise specified, data are presented as means, standard deviation, or percentages. Continuous variables were compared using the unpaired t-test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test. The univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to determine the characteristics that were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. The effective sample size is too small the stepwise bootstrap-adjusted analysis including all variables was used to identify best-fitting variables for the final multivariable Cox- regression model [33 (link),34 (link),35 (link)]. Clinical, microbiological, and echocardiographic variables found to be significantly associated with mortality in a univariate analysis (p < 0.1) were included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis and bootstrap -adjusted analysis. The statistical analyses were performed using a statistical software program (SPSS for Windows, version 17; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Two-sided values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The study (104-6096B) was approved by the Institutional Review Committee on Human Research at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!