The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using vmax encore

1

Standardized Pulmonary Function Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pulmonary function test (PFT) was conducted with a standard spirometer (Vmax Encore, Carefusion, Yorba Linda, Orange County, CA, USA). By detection from the flow sensor, a spirometer can measure the volume and flow of air when the subject inhales or exhales through the mouthpiece. Based on the standardization of the guidelines [1 (link)], the subject inspired as deeply as possible and then expired with maximal effort until there was no flow for at least 6 s for an acceptable FVC trial. The acceptable maneuvers were repeated three times. Once both differences between the largest and the next largest FVC and FEV1 < 0.150 L were met, the pulmonary function test was determined with the trial of the largest value of FVC plus FEV1. The predicted values of FVC (defined as FVCpred) and FEV1 (defined as FEV1pred) were adapted from [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Body Composition, Metabolism, and Dietary Intake Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body composition was assessed by dual-energy Xray absorptiometry (GE Healthcare), basal metabolic rate and substrate oxidation by indirect calorimetry (Vmax Encore; Carefusion), and dietary intake using 3-day-food records and the Food Processor software (V11.3.285, ESHA Research)2 (link),4 (link),5 (link),7 (link),29 (link),30 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Maximal Aerobic Capacity Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants freely chose to complete a sport-specific (either cycle ergometer or treadmill) graded maximal exercise test to determine peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak) using a calibrated metabolic cart (Vmax Encore, CareFusion, YorbaLinda, CA). Treadmill testing followed a customized protocol described previously [9 (link)], as did cycle ergometry [10 (link)]. In both cases, VO2 peak was determined at maximal effort, verified by a plateau in HR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Physical Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants performed a preliminary session during which anthropometry and maximal aerobic capacity were assessed. Height and weight were also measured using a wall‐mounted stadiometer (HR‐200, Tanita, Arlington Heights, IL) and digital scale (BWB‐800, Tanita, Arlington Heights, IL), respectively. Body composition was measured by dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry (GE‐LUNAR Prodigy module, GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI). Aerobic fitness (VO2max) was assessed using an incremental exercise test to exhaustion on an upright cycle ergometer (Kettler ErgoRace, Virginia Beach, VA) in accordance with guidelines from the Canadian Society of Exercise Physiology (CSEP, 1996). Following a self‐paced warmup and at least 10‐minute rest period, the protocol commenced with an external workload of 80 W that increased at a rate of 20 W·min−1 until physical or volitional exhaustion. Expired gases were measured via breath‐by‐breath indirect calorimetry using a metabolic cart (Vmax Encore, Care Fusion, Yorba Linda, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolic Assessment in Weight Stabilization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All subjects underwent a 4‐week weight stabilization period before initiating metabolic testing (±2 kg). Body composition was assessed by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (iDXA; GE Healthcare) and basal metabolic rate was measured by indirect calorimetry (Vmax Encore, CareFusion). Three‐day food records were completed by the subjects (two weekdays, one weekend) and verified by a dietitian for completion. Their nutritional analysis was conducted using The Food Processor software (version 11.3.285, ESHA Research). Plasma parameters were measured as follows: lipids and apoB by COBAS Integra 400 analyzer (Roche Diagnostic), apoB48 by ELISA (Fuji Films/WAKO), glucose by an automated analyzer (YSI Inc., InterScience), insulin and C‐peptide by radioimmunoassay kit (Millipore Corporation), PCSK9 by ELISA kit (Circulex), and IL‐1Ra by high‐sensitivity ELISA kit (R&D system, Minneapolis, MN, USA)(Bissonnette, Saint‐Pierre, et al., 2018; Bissonnette et al., 2013, 2015; Lamantia et al., 2017; Wassef et al., 2015).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Submaximal Cardiorespiratory Fitness Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Submaximal cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed with a submaximal graded exercise test performed on a motorized treadmill as previously described.25 The treadmill speed was maintained at 80.4 m·min−1. The incline of the treadmill was initiated at 0% and increased by 1% at 1‐minute intervals. The test was terminated when the participant first achieved or exceeded 85% of their age‐predicted maximal heart rate.25 Oxygen consumption (L·min−1 and mL·kg−1·min−1) was measured with indirect calorimetry using a metabolic cart (Carefusion Vmax Encore, Yorba Linda, CA), with submaximal fitness represented by oxygen consumption achieved during the final 20 seconds prior to test termination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cardiopulmonary Function Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During all sessions, expired air was continuously recorded using a breath-by-breath gas analyzer (Vmax Encore metabolic cart, CareFusion Corp, California, USA). PPO was the average power output on the last 2-min stage of the maximal incremental test. Heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (Q) were evaluated during all tests using thoracic electrical bioimpedance (Physioflow, Manatec Biomedical, France). All devices were calibrated according to manufacturer guidelines before every test. Arteriovenous O2 difference [(a-v)O2-diff (ml/dl)] was calculated using the following equation: (a-v)O2-diff = VO2 (L/min)/Q (L/min)*100 and stroke volume (SV) was calculated from Q and HR. VO2max, maximal Q (Qmax), maximal SV (SVmax), and maximal (a-v)O2-diff were defined as the highest values achieved over a 30-s period during the incremental test. Time over 90 and 95% of VO2max, Qmax, and HRmax were calculated for all sessions. Peak VO2, peak Q and peak HR were also calculated for each session, and defined as the highest 30-s average for VO2 and Q and highest 5-s average for HR value reached during the session.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Metabolic Profiling in Insulin Resistance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study design was previously described for these subjects (21 (link)). Briefly, 1 week before isotope studies, all subjects underwent dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to assess body fat distribution and lean mass, 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) to determine hepatic TG content, and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic (H-E) clamp to measure insulin sensitivity (Figure 1A). Subjects then maintained an ad libitum diet for 4 days, keeping a record of food intake to allow the individual daily caloric intake to be determined. Subjects were then placed on a 3-day standard meal plan prepared by the Clinical and Translational Research Center kitchen, consisting of 50% carbohydrate, 35% fat, and 15% protein with a daily caloric intake reflective of their usual diet. The final standard meal occurred at 12:00 pm the day before isotopic studies, marking the beginning of a 24-hour fast. Subjects presented to the Advanced Imaging Research Center (AIRC) at 8:00 am the following day to undergo the isotope studies to assess in vivo hepatic metabolism. Indirect calorimetry was performed before the H-E clamp and the isotope study (Vmax Encore, CareFusion). All subjects underwent the same protocol, and the cross-sectional design obviated the need for randomization or blinding.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Standardized Spirometry Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spirometry was performed using automated equipment (Vmax Encore™, CareFusion, Yorba Linda, CA, USA) according to recommended techniques (Miller et al., 2005 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Submaximal Cardiorespiratory Fitness Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At baseline and 3 months, a submaximal exercise test is performed on a cycle ergometer (Corival, Lode B.V. Groningen, The Netherlands), and submaximal cardiorespiratory fitness is measured by breath-by-breath indirect calorimetry using a Vmax Encore metabolic cart (Carefusion, San Diego, CA, USA). Procedures are adjusted from standard fitness testing protocols [45 ] to suit participant clinical presentation. Total and relative (kg BM) oxygen consumption ( V. O2 per min) are determined and will be reported. The height of the seat is individually adjusted for participant leg length and participants are asked to keep a cadence of 60–70 pedal rounds per minute. Heart rate is measured by a pulse belt (Polar Electro, Kempele, Finland) and RPE by Borg Scale [28 (link)] during the ~ 16-min assessment. Participants begin the test with an 8–10 min light warm up and start at 1 W/kg FFM and increase 0.5 W/kg FFM every 3 min until they cannot maintain the watt output at ≥60 rpm, or they reach a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 15–17. Data are used to establish aerobic economy as previously reported [46 (link), 47 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!