The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Haloplex kit

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The HaloPlex kit is a targeted enrichment system designed for rapid library preparation for next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. It enables efficient capture and enrichment of specific genomic regions of interest from DNA samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using haloplex kit

1

Targeted Gene Sequencing of Organoid Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Organoids were collected in cell recovery solution (Corning, Corning, NY, USA). Genomic DNA was extracted with the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), and the DNA quality was analyzed using the Qubit system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). An amount of 200 ng of genomic DNA was used in library construction via the HaloPlex kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Target genes were selected based on reported recurrent gene mutations.8, 9 A list of target genes is given in Table S1. Sequencing was performed by on the MiSeq system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Fastq files were mapped and analyzed using SureCall (Agilent). APC variants were culled by removing those registered in the Human Genetic Variation Database (HGVD release version 2.30). Other variants were annotated with ANNOVAR (2015‐03‐22 released).10 The variants were excluded from the following analysis when maximal population frequency is over 1%. We excluded somatic missense SNVs with the following properties; (a) variants were neither deposited on COSMIC (ver82 https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic/), (b) any variant fraction of the same patients does not exceed 0.25 (subclonal mutations).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Targeted Sequencing of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In total, for 122 genes, we sequenced all exons including 20 flanking intronic base pairs. In addition, for the genes with a known cis-eQTL effect[15 (link)], we included 1000 base pairs upstream of the transcription start site in the sequencing design to enable us to identify regulatory variants in the promoter sequence of those genes.
Pooled targeted enrichment of DNA from 790 Dutch UC patients (12 individuals per pool) was performed using a custom-made kit (Agilent HaloPlex). The HaloPlex kit was designed with Agilent’s Sure Design, resulting in coverage of 99.9% of the target sequence (S1 File).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis of Tumor and Non-Neoplastic Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WES was performed on matched tumor and non-neoplastic tissues using previously described techniques.19 (link),20 (link),22 (link),23 (link) DNA was extracted from macrodissected FFPE or fresh frozen tumor tissue along with peripheral blood lymphocytes or buccal tissue using the Promega Maxwell 16 MDx. The Agilent HaloPlex kit, an enzymatic capture method, was used for library preparation. Both neuropathology review and CLONET software (OMICS_07304), a computational tool to estimate ploidy and tumor content, estimated tumor content. An Illumina HiSeq 2500 system (2 × 100 bp) was used to sequence all samples. A total of 21 522 genes were analyzed with an average coverage of 90× and 94× for tumor and non-neoplastic specimens, respectively. All bioinformatics analyses were performed according to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-approved Whole-Exome Sequencing Test For Cancer-EXaCT-1-pipeline version 09.20 (link)Germline variants were screened based on our most recent germline pipeline.19 (link),20 (link) For the purpose of the study, we included only variants in 152 cancer-associated germline genes. All candidate pathogenic germline variants detected were manually reviewed with the Integrative Genome Viewer.24 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Detecting POLE Mutations in CRC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequencing data from 95 CRC patients fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria but without identified germline mutation (previously tested for MLH1, PMS2, MSH6, MSH2, APC and MUTYH) was investigated for the POLE mutation. The library was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions using a custom Haloplex kit (Agilent Technologies) and was subsequently sequenced on a HiSeq 2500 (Illumina) with 2 × 100 bp paired end sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Exome Sequencing for Donor-Recipient Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, genotypes of donors and recipients were assayed by exome sequencing (Illumina TruSeq enrichment kit for the Discovery Cohort and Agilent Haloplex kit for the Cornell Validation Cohort and the French Validation Cohort). Reads were aligned to the human genome with the Last [9 (link)] aligner integrated as a plugin in GobyWeb [8 (link)]. Genotype calls were made with Goby [10 (link)] and GobyWeb [8 (link)]. Prediction of polymorphism impact on the protein sequence were performed with the Variant Effect Predictor [27 (link)]. Genes that contain at least one transmembrane segment were identified using Ensembl Biomart [28 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Targeted gene sequencing in cell lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Targeted enrichment and sequencing were performed on 225 ng of DNA extracted from the cell lines. Enrichment was performed using a custom HaloPlex Kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) targeting 41 genes. Sequencing was undertaken on a MiSeq sequencer (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Targeted Sequencing of Lymphoma Genomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction of genomic DNA from frozen tissue of cases of THRLBCL and NLPHL, ultra-deep targeted resequencing after bait-based enrichment by a custom Haloplex kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and processing of sequencing reads were carried out as described previously.12 (link) All 62 genes used for the ultra-deep targeted resequencing were selected based on mutated genes from a previous study of two clonally related composite lymphomas consisting of NLPHL and DLBCL (Online Supplementary Table S1).12 (link) Some of these selected genes were already confirmed to be mutated in primary NLPHL without transformation into DLBCL.12 (link) The mean coverage of the 26 cases ranged between 3500 and 8500× (Online Supplementary Table S2). Non-synonymous single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were filtered for allele frequencies based on the expected tumor cell content (0.1-10%), and the presence and somatic origin of selected variants were confirmed in a semi-nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approach followed by Sanger sequencing of the PCR products, as indicated in Online Supplementary Table S3. Details on validation of mutations using microdissected tumor cells and analysis of the somatic hypermutation (SHM) features of SNVs are provided in the Online Supplementary Methods section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Targeted Sequencing of ST18 Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA enrichment was performed using HaloPlex kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and sequencing was conducted on a MiSeq system sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with 150 bp paired-end reads. A total of 463407 bp were included in the capture design, covering the entire ST18 gene (chr8: 53,023,399–53,373,519, GRCh37/hg19 assembly) as well as 10 kb downstream and 50 kb upstream to the gene and an additional 2 Mb located upstream and downstream to the gene and predicted to harbor putative regulatory regions (https://www.encodeproject.org).
The sequencing data were processed using MiSeq Reporter 2.0.26 and Casava softwares (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and analyzed for quality control using FastQC software (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc). Reads were aligned to the Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 37 (GRCh37/hg19) using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner [40 (link)] and variant detection was achieved using The Genome Analysis Toolkit [41 (link)]. Variants were annotated by ANNOVAR [42 (link)] and the frequency of each variant was determined using data from dbSNP138, the 1000 Genome Project and an in-house database. Case-control association test for variants was performed with chi-square, and permutation test, using the Caucasian population from the 1000 Genome Project data (http://www.1000genomes.org) as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genetic Screening for 46,XY DSD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mutation screening was performed for 110 patients clinically diagnosed with 46,XY DSD. We analyzed 11 major causative genes for 46,XY DSD (AR, CBX2, DHH, GATA4, MAP3K1, NR5A1, SOX9, SRY, SRD5A2, WT1, and ZFPM2) using a custom made NGS gene panel. The library was constructed using a HaloPlex kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and sequence data were obtained using MiSeq or HiSeq 2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The sequencing reads were mapped by BWA (version 0.7.12) using Human GRCh37/hg19 (UCSC Genome Browser) as the reference. Base quality calibration was carried out by GATK (version 3.5). Functional consequences of missense variants were assessed using four in silico programs, i.e., Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD, https://cadd.gs.washington.edu/), PolyPhen-2 (https://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT, https://sift.jcvi.org/), and MutationTaster (https://www.mutationtaster.org/). Variants of interest were subjected to Sanger sequencing. The frequency of variants in the general population was examined by the Genome Aggregation Database (genomAD, https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/), the Human Genetic Variation Database (https://www.hgvd.genome.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp/) and the 2,049 Japanese genome reference panel (2KJPN)30 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!