The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Achieva quasar tx

Manufactured by Philips
Sourced in United States, Netherlands

The Philips Achieva Quasar TX is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system designed for clinical use. It is equipped with a superconducting magnet that generates a strong magnetic field, enabling the acquisition of high-quality MRI images. The system is capable of performing a variety of MRI examinations, including neurological, musculoskeletal, and body imaging.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using achieva quasar tx

1

3D T1-Weighted MRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired at the Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Bronx, NY, USA) with a Philips 3T MRI scanner (Achieva Quasar TX; Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands). Standard three-dimensional T1-weighted images were analyzed [TR/TE of 9.9/4.6 ms., 240 mm2 FOV, 240 × 240 × 220 matrix and 1 mm voxel size; for additional acquisition details see (Blumen et al., 2014 (link))].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Harmonized Neuroimaging Acquisition Across Cohorts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired at each study site, and then transferred to Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Bronx, NY) for centralized/harmonized processing. Images were acquired with a Philips 3T MRI scanner (Achieva Quasar TX; Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands) in CCMA, a General Electric (GE) 1.5 T MRI scanner (GE LX Horizon, Milwaukee, WI) in TASCOG, a Siemens 1.5T MRI scanner (Magnetom Avanto; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) in GAIT, and a Siemens 3T MRI scanner (TIM Trio, Siemens, Germany) in NCGG-SGS. Standard three-dimensional T1-weighted images were obtained from all cohorts: 1) CCMA: TR/TE of 9.9/4.6 ms, 240 mm2 FOV, and 1 mm voxel size (for additional details, see [41 (link)]), 2) TASCOG: TR/TE of 37/7 ms, 240 mm2 FOV, and 1 mm voxel size [42 (link)], 3) GAIT: TR/TE 2170/4.07 ms, 240 mm2 mm FOV, and 1 mm voxel size [26 (link)], and 4) NCGG-SGS: TR/TE of 1.98/1800 ms and 1.1 mm voxel size [45 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

High-Resolution 3T MRI Neuroimaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed using a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Achieva Quasar TX;
Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) and 32-channel head coil (Sense
Head Coil; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). T1-weighted
whole-head structural imaging was performed using sagittal three-dimensional
magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MP-RAGE) with TR/TE
9.9/4.6 ms; 240 mm2 FOV; 240×240 matrix; partition thickness,
1 mm; and parallel acceleration factor 2.0. In addition, a 3D T2-weighted
fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2W-FLAIR) acquisition was obtained with
the following pulse sequence parameters: TR/TE/TI 11000/120/2800 ms;
240×240 mm FOV; 240×240 matrix; 1 mm partition thickness and
parallel acceleration factor 2.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal MRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed using a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Achieva Quasar TX; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) and 32-channel head coil (Sense Head Coil; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). T1-weighted whole-head structural imaging was performed using sagittal three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MP-RAGE) with TR/TE 9.9/4.6ms; 240 mm2 FOV; 240×240 matrix; partition thickness, 1 mm; and parallel acceleration factor 2.0. In addition, a 3D T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2W-FLAIR) acquisition was obtained with the following pulse sequence parameters: TR/TE/TI 11000/120/2800ms; 240 × 240 mm FOV; 240 × 240 matrix; 1mm partition thickness and parallel acceleration factor 2.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

High-Resolution Structural Brain Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed using a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Achieva Quasar TX; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) and 32-channel head coil (Sense Head Coil; Philips Medical Systems). T1-weighted whole-head structural imaging was performed using sagittal three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) with TR/TE 9.9/4.6ms; 240 mm2 field of view; 240×240 mm matrix; partition thickness, 1mm; and parallel acceleration factor 2.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed using a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Achieva Quasar TX; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) and 32-channel head coil (Sense Head Coil; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). T1-weighted whole-head structural imaging was performed using sagittal three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (TFE- turbo field echo) with TR/TE 9.9/4.6 ms; 240 mm2 FOV; 240×240 matrix; partition thickness, 1 mm; and parallel acceleration factor 2.0. In addition, a 3D T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2W-FLAIR) acquisition was obtained with the following pulse sequence parameters: TR/TE/TI 11000/120/2800 ms; 240×240 mm FOV; 240×240 matrix; 1 mm partition thickness and parallel acceleration factor 2.0. Diffusion tensor MRI employed a single shot spin-echo echoplanar acquisition with TR/TE 3000/65 ms; 256×240 mm FOV; 128×117 matrix; mm slice thickness with no gap; parallel acceleration factor 2.8, b value=800 and 32 diffusion sensitizing directions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Structural MRI Acquisition Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were first acquired at the Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center in Bronx (CCMA and EAS cohorts) or University of Angers Hospital in Angers (GAIT cohort), and then sent to Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Bronx, NY, USA) for pre-processing and group-level covariance analyses. The French images were acquired with a Magnetom Avanto 1.5T MRI scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) and the American images were acquired with a Philips 3T MRI scanner (Achieva Quasar TX; Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands). Standard three-dimensional T1-weighted images were obtained from all three cohorts: 1) CCMA: TR/TE of 99/4.6 ms., 240 mm2 FOV, 240 × 240 × 240 matrix and 1 mm voxel size [for additional acquisition details see (Blumen, 2014 )], 2) EAS: TR/TE of 9.9/4.6 ms., 240 mm2 FOV, 240 × 240 × 220 matrix and 1 mm voxel size [for additional acquisition details see (Ezzati et al., 2015 (link))], and 3) GAIT: TR/TE 2170/4.07 ms., 240 mm2 mm FOV, 256 × 256 × 144 matrix and 1 mm voxel size [for additional acquisition details see (Beauchet et al., 2016a (link))].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Structural MRI Analysis of Brain Volume

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed using a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Achieva Quasar TX; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) with a 32-channel head coil (Sense Head Coil; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). T1-weighted whole-head structural imaging was performed using sagittal three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MP-RAGE) with TR/TE 9.9/4.6ms; 240 mm2 FOV; 240×240 matrix; partition thickness, 1 mm; and parallel acceleration factor 2.0.
MRI data was processed using the FreeSurfer software package (version 5.2, available at http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). Image processing methods in the EAS have been previously described in detail [30 (link)]. Total HV was segmented using FreeSurfer’s standard segmentation procedure using a probabilistic brain atlas [31 (link)]. Additionally, for each subject, the estimated total intracranial volume (TICV) was calculated within FreeSurfer by the procedure described by Buckner et al. [32 (link)]. Visits between cognitive testing and MRI were approximately two weeks apart.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

MRI-Based Hippocampal Volume Estimation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed using a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Achieva Quasar TX; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) with a 32-channel head coil (Sense Head Coil; Philips Medical Systems). Details of the imaging protocol has been described previously (Ezzati et al., 2014 (link)). Tl-weighted volumetric images were processed using the FreeSurfer software package (version 5.3, available at FreeSurfer Developer website). For each subject the estimated total intracranial volume (TICV) and the whole hippocampal formation on each side was estimated using Free Surfer’s standard segmentation procedure using a probabilistic brain atlas (Fischl et al., 2002 (link)). Details of MRI analysis has been described previously (Ezzati et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!