The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using stellant d

1

Quantifying Coronary Artery Stenosis via CCTA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A third-generation dual-source CT (Siemens Somatom FORCE, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) was used for imaging. A specified regime of medication consisting of sublingual nitroglycerin (0.8 mg) and intravenous beta-blockers were given prior to the scan if deemed necessary by a radiologist. Initially, 80 mL iodinated contrast material (Iomeron 400; Bracco Imaging S.p.A., Milan, Italy) was administered using a power injector (Stellant D; Medrad, Warrendale, PA, USA) at a flow rate of 5 mL/s followed by a 50 mL saline chaser. Coronary artery stenosis was analyzed and quantified using on-site software (Coronary Plaque Analysis 2.0. syngo. via FRONTIER, Siemens Healthineers). The grading was done in accordance with the guidelines of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Triple-Phase CT Angiography Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Triple-phase CTA was performed using a 64- (n = 49) or 256- (n = 62) channel multidetector CT scanner (Brilliance 64 or iCT 256; Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA). After obtaining non-enhanced images, intravenous contrast agent (2 mL/kg; iopromide, Ultravist 370; Bayer, Berlin, Germany) was administered via antecubital vein using a power injector (Stellant D, Medrad, Indianola, PA, USA) at a rate of 4 mL/sec.
Bolus-tracking software (Brilliance; Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA) was used to initiate arterial phase scanning 15 seconds after enhancing the abdominal aorta to a 200 Hounsfield units threshold. Portal venous phase scanning was obtained with a fixed scan delay of 60 seconds after the beginning of contrast material injection. The scan range of all three phases was from the diaphragm to the symphysis pubis in a supine position. Helical scan data were acquired using 64 × 0.625 mm or 2 × 128 × 0.625 mm collimation, a rotation speed of 0.5 seconds, a pitch of 0.891 or 0.993, and 120 kVp. Effective mAs ranged from 125 to 460 mAs using an automatic tube current modulation technique (Dose-Right; Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA). Transverse and coronal section datasets for the three phases were reconstructed with a section of 4-mm thickness at 3-mm increments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Prospective ECG-Triggered Cardiac CT Angiography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A dual-source CT scanner (Somatom Definition FLASH, Siemens Healthineers) or a 256-slice CT scanner (Revolution CT, GE Healthcare) was used for imaging. For the prospectively ECG-triggered CCTA, the patients with body mass index (BMI) of < 24 kg/m2 were scanned at 100 kV and those with BMIs of ≥ 24 kg/m2 were scanned at 120 kV. The tube current was modulated by automatic exposure control. The acquisition window was performed within the 70% R-R interval for heart rates (HRs) of < 60 bpm, 40–70% R-R interval for HRs of 60–80 bpm, or 30–40% R-R interval for HRs of > 80 bpm. Bolus-tracking was performed with the region of interest placed in the root of the aorta, and image acquisition was automatically started 6 seconds after a predefined threshold of 100 Hounsfield units was reached. The scanning range was set from the tracheal bifurcation to 1 cm below the diaphragm. The contrast agent was injected with a dual-head power injector (Stellant D, Medrad) through an 18–20-gauge intravenous needle placed in the right antecubital vein. Fifty to seventy milliliters of contrast agent (Ultravist, iopromide 370 mg iodine/mL, Bayer AG) was injected, followed by 30 mL of saline as a bolus chaser with an injection rate of 4.5–5 mL/s for all the phases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiphase CT Imaging for Pancreatic Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent multi-phase contrast-enhanced CT imaging using a pancreas protocol. After the acquisition of non-contrast images, an intravenous contrast material (iohexol (350 mg of iodine per milliliter), Omnipaque; GE Healthcare, United States) was injected via the antecubital vein using a power injector (Stellant D; Medrad, Indianola, PA) at a dose of 1.5 mL/kg and a rate of 3–4 mL/s. CT scans of the PPP and PVP were initiated after the bolus of contrast media 20 and 60 s after an upper abdominal aortic enhancement of 200 Hounsfield units (HU), respectively. Non-contrast and PPP images were acquired from the level of the diaphragm to the level of the umbilicus, and PVP images were obtained from the level of the diaphragm to level of the symphysis pubis. Images were acquired with 64 or 256 multi-detector CT scanners (Brilliance 64, iCT256; Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA). The scanning parameters were as follows: 64 × 0.625 or 128 × 0.6205 mm collimation; a rotation speed of 0.5 s; a pitch of 0.641 or 0.993; and a kvP of 120. The effective mAs ranged from 70 to 390 mAs using an automatic tube current modulation technique (Dose-Right; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). Axial and coronal CT images were reconstructed using filtered back projection with 4 mm-thick sections at 3 mm increments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ECG-Gated Cardiac CT Scanning Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Using a third‐generation DSCT scanner (SOMATOM Force, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany), electrocardiography (ECG)‐gated cardiac CT scanning was performed. A retrospective ECG‐gated spiral scan with ECG‐based tube current modulation was applied to multiphase of 0%–90% of the R‐R interval. Automatic exposure control was active, enabling both the adjustment of tube voltage and tube current based on the topogram information. A bolus of 60–70 ml of contrast material (iomeprol; Iomeron 400, Bracco Imaging S.p.A, Milan, Italy) was administered by a power injector (Stellant D, Medrad, Indianola, PA, USA) at 4.5 ml/s followed by 40 ml of saline. An automated bolus tracking system was used to synchronize the arrival of the contrast material with the initiation of the scan. CCTA scan was performed with a tube voltage of 120 kVp, a rotation time of 250 ms, and adaptive tube current (185–380 mA). The effective radiation dose of each scan was calculated by multiplying the dose‐length product by 0.014 mSv/mGy × 1 cm as the constant k‐value. Automatically selected the best cardiac diastolic period, images were reconstructed at a section thickness of 0.75 mm and an increment of 0.6 mm with a Bv40 kernel. The selected FOV was 180mm and the matrix was 512 × 512.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

CECT Imaging of Hepatic Phases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the CECT images were obtained by Philips Brilliance 64-slice detector-row machines (Philips Healthcare). The enhanced scan (120 kVp, 200 mA, pitch 0.891 to 1.235; collimation 64  ×  0.625 mm) was initiated 30 s (hepatic arterial phase) and 90 s (portal venous phase) after injection of the contrast medium (1.5-2.0 mL/kg, Iohexol: Beijing Beilu Pharmaceutical), using a power injector (Stellant D, Medrad) with the speed of 2 to 3 mL/s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Liver CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CT examinations were performed on a 256-slice MDCT machine (Brilliance-iCT; Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH, USA) at our hospital. The liver CT protocol was composed of four phases: pre-contrast, arterial phase (AP), portal venous phase (PVP), and delayed phase. CT scanning was performed using the following parameters; tube voltage, 100 kVp; tube current-time products, 280 mAs; detector collimation, 128 × 0.625 mm; rotation time, 0.5 seconds; pitch, 1.0; slice thickness, 3 mm. A nonionic contrast material, iobitridol (Xenetix 350; Guerbet Korea, Seoul, Korea) was injected at a dose of 520 mg/kg of body weight using a power injector (Stellant D; Medrad, Warrendale, PA, USA) for 30 seconds at a rate of 2.1–4.3 mL/s according to body weight. Timing for the PVP scan was determined using the bolus tracking technique; that is, AP imaging was automatically performed 17 seconds after the attenuation coefficient of the abdominal aortic blood reached 100 Hounsfield units. PVP images were acquired 70 seconds after the start of contrast media administration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Tri-phasic Contrast-enhanced CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All examinations were performed by a second-generation dual-source CT scanner (Somatom Definition Flash; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) in our hospital. Patients with iodine contrast medium allergy were excluded. Tri-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced CT scans were performed in all patients during a single breath hold with patients in the supine position in a single-energy mode. None of the patients were administered an oral contrast agent. An automated power injector (Stellant D; MedRad, Indianola, PA) was used to administer 60 to 80 mL of contrast material (ioversol, 320 gI/100 mL) at a rate of 3.5 mL/s followed by 20 mL of saline solution into the antecubital vein via an 18-ga catheter. Tri-phasic contrast-enhanced dynamic exploration during the arterial, portal, and delayed phases was performed separately at 30, 60, and 120 s after contrast material injection. Scan parameters were as follows: tube voltage, 120 kv; detector collimation, 128 × 0.6 mm; and current flow-dose modulation (CARE Dose4D; Siemens) was enabled with a range of 256 to 436 mAs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Pediatric Cardiac CT Angiography Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Under a calm breathing state, all enrolled children were scanned by Somatom definition DSCT scanner (Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) using a dual-syringe power injector (Stellant D, Medrad, Indianola, PA). The scanning was performed in cardiac-DS-children-heart-ECG pattern and the orientation was from the head to feet. The scanning performed from the thoracic entrance to 5 mm subphrenic. Tube voltage (80 - 100 kv) and tube current (50 - 180 mAs) were individually adjusted according to their age and weight (14 (link)). Iopromide was injected to each child (370 mg/mL, 1.0 - 2.5 mL/kg) at the speed of 0.5 - 2.5 mL/s via two-tube high pressure syringe (Medrad, The USA), and then normal saline (2 - 20 mL) at the same flow rate. For setting DSCT, the main pulmonary artery was set as the region of interest and scanning was triggered with the bolus-tracking method at the threshold of 70 Hounsfield unit (HU) with 6 seconds delay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Preoperative CT Evaluation of Pancreatic Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The interval between preoperative CT examination and surgery ranged from 0 to 13 days (6.8 ± 3.1 days) for the occult PC group and from 1 to 14 days (7.0 ± 3.6 days) for the control group. Contrast-enhanced CT examination was performed following injection of intravenous nonionic contrast material (2 mL/kg; iopromide, Ultravist 370: Bayer, Berlin, Germany) with power injection (Stellant D, Medrad, Indianola, PA) at a rate of 3 mL/sec. 16-, 64-, or 256-channel MDCT (Mx 8000, Brilliance 64, or iCT256; Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH) were used for 61, 34, and 7 patients, respectively. The patients ingested 1.2 L of water just before the CT scan. CT scanning of portal venous phase was done after the bolus contrast media injection with a delay of 60 seconds after the aortic enhancement of 150 HU. CT scans were acquired under the following parameters: 120 kV; collimation, any of 16 x 1.5 or 64 x 0.625 or 128 x 0.625 mm; rotation time, 0.5 seconds; pitch, 1.25, 0.641, or 0.993. Tube current was automatically modulated (Dose-Right; Philips Medical Systems), and axial and coronal images were reconstructed with 4-mm thickness at 3-mm intervals by using filtered back projection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!