The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Polyjet in vitro dna transfection reagent

Manufactured by SignaGen
Sourced in United States

PolyJet In Vitro DNA Transfection Reagent is a laboratory product designed for the delivery of DNA into cells in vitro. It is a transfection reagent that facilitates the introduction of genetic material into target cells for research and experimental purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

195 protocols using polyjet in vitro dna transfection reagent

1

Cell Transfection and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell transfections were performed with PolyJetTM DNA in vitro Transfection Reagent (# SL100688, SignaGen Laboratories, Rockville, MD, USA). Cell extracts were subjected to western blot analysis as described previously [55 (link)–57 (link)]. For more details, please see the Supplement of “Materials and Methods”.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transfection of Mammalian Cells with Plasmid DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were transfected with plasmid DNA using PolyJetTM DNA In Vitro Transfection Reagent (#SL100688 from SignaGen Laboratories) according to manufacturer's instructions. For transfection experiments, HEK293A cells were plated in 10-cm culture dishes ∼24 h prior to transfection. For mTORC1 and mTORC2 co-immunoprecipitation experiments, cells were transfected with 2 µg of Myc-tagged mTOR and 2 µg HA-tagged Raptor, HA-tagged Rictor or empty vector in HEK293A cells. Fresh medium was added 6 h after the transfection. 24 h post transfection, cells were treated accordingly and samples were collected for immunoprecipitation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metastatic Bladder Cancer Cell Line

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human invasive BC cell line T24 and the paired metastatic cell line T24T was kindly provided by Dr. Dan Theodorescu (Departments of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA) (24 (link)) in 2010 and used in our previous studies (25 (link), 26 (link)). Both T24 and T24T cells were subjected to DNA tests and authenticated in our previous studies (27 (link)). The cell lines were regularly authenticated on the basis of viability, growth, morphology, recovery and chemical response as well, and were most recently confirmed 4–6 months before use by using a short tandem repeat method. Cells were cultured in DMEM/Ham’s F-12 (1:1 volume) mixed medium supplemented with 5% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 2 mM L-glutamine. Transfections were carried out using PolyJetTM DNA In Vitro Transfection Reagent (SignaGen Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (26 (link)). The transfected cells were then respectively selected with hygromycin, G418 or puromycin (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) for 4–6 weeks. Surviving cells were pooled as stable mass transfectants as described in our previous studies (28 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Study of Immortalized p27 MEFs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 3T3 protocol-immortalized wild-type p27 (p27+/+) and p27-deficient (p27−/−(Δ51)) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were described in previous study [50 (link)], and were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS. Human invasive bladder cancer cell line UMUC3 and T24 [36 (link), 51 (link)] was cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS and DMEM/Ham’s F-12 (1:1) with 5% FBS, respectively, while human transitional bladder cancer HT1197 [52 (link)] was cultured in MEM with 10% FBS. Cell transfections were performed with PolyJetTM DNA in Vitro Transfection Reagent (SignaGen Laboratories, Rockville, MD), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For stable transfection, MEFs were subjected to selection with hygromycin B (200 μg/mL) or puromycin (2.0 μg/mL) depending on the different antibiotic resistance of the plasmids transfected. Cells surviving from the antibiotic selection were pooled as mass stable transfectants. UMUC3 and T24 transfectants were selected by puromycin (0.4 μg/mL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Knockdown and Luciferase Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For knockdown of SESN2, BECN1, and HGK, pGFP-V-RS plasmid encoding shRNA against human SESN2 (TG301755), BECN1 (TG314484), and HGK (TG320615) were purchased from OriGene (Rockville, MD). For luciferase reporter assays, the AP-1-Luc (60612) and SESN2-Luc (HPRM12429-PG02) were purchased from BPS Bioscience (San Diego, CA) and OriGene, respectively. The luciferase activities were measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The cells were stably transfected by using PolyJetTM DNA In Vitro Transfection Reagent (SignaGen Laboratories), according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cycloheximide-Mediated Luciferase Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) was bought from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). The dual luciferase assay kit, TRIzol reagent and SuperScriptTM First-Strand Synthesis system were obtained from Promega (Madison, WI, USA) and Invitrogen (Grand Island, NY, USA), respectively. PolyJetTM DNA in Vitro Transfection Reagent was purchased from SignaGen Laboratories (Rockville, MD, USA). The plasmids of CRISPR/Cas9 RAC1 and its control vector were bought from Open Biosystems (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). miR-145 promoter luciferase plasmid, miR-365a promoter luciferase plasmid, RAC1 3′UTR luciferase plasmid, Dicer 3’UTR luciferase plasmid, miR-365a overexpression plasmid were constructed by us. A fragment spanning 1228 bp relative to the mRNA 3’UTR site of human RAC1 genomic sequence was produced by PCR with the forward primer 5′- CCG CTC GAG CTT CGC ACT CAA TGC CAA CT -3′ and the reverse primer 5′- TCC GAG CTC GAC CCA AAG GAA CAT CAA TAG G -3′. The PCR products were subcloned into the XhoI and SacI sites of pMIR-Report vector (Promega Co., E1751) to generate the RAC1 3′UTR luciferase plasmid. The construct was confirmed by DNA sequencing (GENEWIZ). All transfectants were used as a mass pool culture rather than individual clones.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transfecting Lung Cancer Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human lung cancer cell line A549 (BFN60800665,
BLUEFBIO™, China), H1299 (BFN60804058,
BLUEFBIO™, China) and human bronchial epithelial
cell line Beas-2B (BFN608009328, BLUEFBIO™,
China) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s
medium (DMEM, Cat No. C11995500BT, Gibco,
China), supplemented with 2 μM of L-glutamine (Cat
No. 25030149, Gibco, China), 25 μg/ml of gentamycin
(Cat No. 15710-049, Thermo Fisher Scientific, China),
and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS,
Cat No. 10099-141C, Gibco, China). Cell transfections
were performed by using PolyJetTM DNA In Vitro
Transfection Reagent(Cat No. SL100468, SignaGen
Laboratories, USA), according to the manufacturer’s
instruction and described in the previous studies (18 (link)).
For the transfection of pcDNA3.1/Flag-FHL1 into A549
and H1299 cell lines, 2 μg of plasmids were used, and
the stable transfectants were generated by G418 selection
(500 g/ml). For the transfection of shRhoGDIβ into A549
(Flag-FHL1), 2 μg of plasmids were used, and the stable
transfectants were generated by puromycin selection (2
μg/ml).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Fusion Inhibition Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK-293T cells were transfected with pAAV-IRES-EGFP or pAAV-IRES-SARS-CoV-2-S-EGFP as the effector cells by PolyJetTM DNA in vitro Transfection Reagent (SignaGen, USA). Huh 7 cells/Vero E6 cells (1 × 104) expressing ACE2 receptor were incubated in 96-well plates at 37°C for 5 h followed by the addition of 293T/EGFP or 293T/SARS-CoV-2-S/EGFP cells with or without compounds. After co-culture at 37°C for 12 h, three fields in each well were randomly selected to count fused and unfused cells under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-S). The percent inhibition of cell-cell fusion was calculated using the following formula, as described elsewhere [1 − (E − N)/(P − N)] × 100%. “E” represents the percentage of cell-cell fusion in the experimental group. “P” represents the percentage of cell-cell fusion in the positive control group, where 293T/SARS-CoV-2- S/EGFP cells were used as effector cells to which no compound was added. “N” represents the percentage of cell-cell fusion in the negative control group, in which 293T/EGFP cells were used as effector cells. The IC50 was calculated using CalcuSyn software. Samples were tested in triplicate, and all experiments were repeated twice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Establishment of Stable Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell transfections were performed with PolyJetTM DNA in Vitro Transfection Reagent (SignaGen Laboratories, Rockville, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For stable transfection, cell cultures were subjected to hygromycin B (200-400 μg/mL), G418 (500-1000 μg/mL) or puromycin (0.2-0.3μg/mL) and cells surviving from the antibiotics selection were pooled as stable mass transfectants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mitochondrial Catalase Expression Plasmid Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mitochondria Catalase expression plasmid (pZeo/mCat) and its parental control vector were kindly provided by Dr. J. Andres Melendez (Center for Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical College) as described before [31 (link), 32 (link)]. HCT116 cells were transfected with mCat and its corresponding control vector by using PolyJetTM DNA In Vitro Transfection Reagent (SignaGen Laboratories, Rockville, MD, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions and stable transfectants were selected by Zeocin-resistant selection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!