The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using umr 770

1

Multiparametric MRI of Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients were scanned using two 3.0 T MRI scanners (uMR770; United Imaging, Shanghai, China and Ingenia; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) with the same sequences and standard phased array surface coils according to the European Society of Urogenital Radiology guidelines. T1WI, T2WI, DWI and ADC sequences were acquired. Detailed parameters for transverse DWI (b-values of 50, 1,000, and 1,500 s/mm2) were as follows: repetition time (TR), 5,100 ms; echo time (TE), 80 ms; field of view, 26 × 22 cm; and thickness, 3 mm. Low b-value images were acquired at 50 s/mm2 to avoid perfusion effects at a b-value of 0 s/mm2. ADC maps were calculated from the b-value (1,500 s/mm2) using the scanner software. T2WI, DWI (b-values of 1,500 s/mm2), and ADC (b-values of 1,500 s/mm2) sequences were used in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

MRI and CT Imaging of Knee Joint

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnetic resonance (MR) data were obtained from a 35-year-old male patient using the 3-T clinical MR scanner (uMR 770; United Imaging, Shanghai, People's Republic of China) with a 12-channel knee send–receive radio frequency coil. The patient was in the supine position, and the knee to be examined was positioned in the central region of the coil. A modulated flip angle technique in refocused imaging with extended echo train sequence was performed using two excitations, 176 continuous slices and a slice thickness of 1.5 mm, repetition time 1000 ms, echo time 56 ms, matrix 240*228, field of view 152 mm, and voxel size of 0.67 × 0.63 × 0.64 mm³ was used for sagittal planes. The scan time was 6 min 44 s. Computed tomography was performed using the GE Lightspeed 16 CT equipment (GE Healthcare, CT, USA) on the same individual. The scan was performed on the lower limb at the neutral posture with a slice distance of 0.625 mm and a field of view of 500 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Imaging of Lower Limb Anatomy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MR data was obtained from a 35-year-old male using a 3-T clinical MR scanner (uMR 770, United Imaging, Shanghai, P.R.C) and a 12-channel knee send-receive radio frequency coil. The subject was in the supine position and the knee to be examined was positioned in the central region of the coil. A modulated flip angle technique in refocused imaging with extended echo train sequence was performed for each subject using two excitations, 176 continuous slices with a slice thickness of 1.5 mm, repetition time 1000 ms, echo time 56 ms, matrix 240*228, FOV 152 mm, and voxel size 0.67 × 0.63 × 0.64 mm3 was used in sagittal planes. The scan time was 6 min and 44 s. The CT data was obtained from the same individual using a GE Lightspeed 16 CT instrument (GE, CT, USA). The scan was performed for the lower limb at the neutral posture with a slice distance of 0.625 mm and a field of view (FOV) of 500 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MRI-Guided Hepatic Tumor Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MRI examinations were completed within two weeks prior to radical surgery. Patients were scanned in the supine position using a 3.0-T whole-body MRI scanner (uMR770, United Imaging, China) with a sixteen-channel phased-array coil centered over the belly. Before the MRI, all patients were required to fast for a minimum of 8 hours. A T1-weighted volume interpolated breath-hold gradient recall echo sequence was used to provide an unenhanced scan, dynamic contrast-enhanced phase, and hepatobiliary phase (HBP). The dynamic contrast-enhanced scan early arterial (EAP) and late arterial phases (LAP) were used to ensure that we could observe the enhancement of the tumor. A dosage of 0.025 mmol/kg Gd-EOB-DTPA (Primovist; Bayer HealthCare, Berlin, Germany) was administered at a rate of 2.0 mL/s, and then followed by a 30-mL saline flush at the same rate. Using bolus triggering, a dual arterial phase sequence was started 15-25 seconds after the contrast media arrived at the distal thoracic aorta, while the portal venous phase (PVP), delay phase (DP), and HBP were acquired at 1, 3, and 15 minutes after Gd-EOB-DTPA administration, respectively. The HBP images were used to assist in the diagnosis and demarcation of the tumor location.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Intratympanic Gadolinium Contrast MRI Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As our previous studies described, the Gd contrast medium (Omniscan, Xudonghaipu Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China) was diluted 8-fold with saline (v/v, 1: 7). Approximately 0.4–0.6 ml of the diluted Gd was injected intratympanically. The injection was performed under a microscope. The patient then was placed in the supine position for 60 min (14 (link)).
Twenty-four hours after the Gd injection, MRI scans were performed with a 3.0 Tesla MR scanner (UMR 770, united-imaging, Shanghai, China), using a 24-channel head coil. 3D-FLAIR imaging was subsequently performed. The scan parameters for the 3D-FLAIR sequence were as follows: time of repetition = 6,500 ms, time of echo = 286.1 ms, time of inversion = 1,950 ms, flip angle = 67°, slice thickness = 0.6 mm, echo train length = 160, field of view = 200 * 200 mm, and matrix size = 256 * 256, voxel size = 0.78 * 0.78 * 1.1 mm. The scan time was 6 min 11 s. Three dimensional heavily T2-weighted spectral attenuated inversion recovery (3D-T2-SPAIR) sequence was also performed with the following parameters: voxel size = 0.65 * 0.52 * 0.76 mm, scan time = 4 min 30 s, TR = 1,300 ms, TE = 254.7 ms, flip angle = 110°, slice thickness = 0.4 mm, field of view = 200 * 200 mm, and matrix size = 384 * 384 (15 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Magnetic Resonance and CT Imaging of Healthy Knee

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The magnetic resonance data were obtained from a 35-year-old healthy male volunteer with a body weight of 80 ​kg and a height of 178 ​cm by a 3-T clinical MR scanner (uMR 770; United Imaging, Shanghai, China) using the 12-channel knee send-receive radio frequency coil. The volunteer neither had any underlying diseases nor lower limb traumatic history. The volunteer was placed in a supine position with no weight-bearing, and the knee to be examined was positioned in the central region of the coil. A modulated flip angle technique in refocused imaging with extended echo train sequence was performed in each participant using 2 excitations and 176 contiguous slices, and a slice thickness of 1.5 ​mm, repetition time 1000 ​ms, echo time 56 ​ms, matrix 240 ​× ​228, field of view 152 ​mm, and voxel size 0.67 ​× ​0.63 ​× ​0.64 ​mm³ were used in sagittal planes. The scan time was 6 ​min and 44 ​s. A CT scan was performed using a GE Lightspeed 16 CT equipment (GE Healthcare, CT, USA) on the same participant on the lower limb at the neutral posture with a slice distance of 0.625 ​mm and a field of view of 500 ​mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal MRI Protocol for Preoperative Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MRI data analyzed in the present study were preoperatively acquired using 3.0 T MRI scanners according to the protocols in each institution, including the Philips instrument (Achieva TX, Philips Medical Systems, The Netherlands) and United imaging instrument (uMR770, United Imaging Healthcare, China), and the parameters are shown in Table S1. Available preoperative MRI images included T1 weighted image (T1WI), T2 weighted image (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and T1 contrast-enhanced (T1CE) MR images. We eliminated the difference in MRI image brightness caused by the deviation in the scanning process and performed N4 deviation field correction on all MRI images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

High-Resolution 3D MRI Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI was performed 24 h after the application of the contrast agent on a 3.0 Tesla MR scanner (Umr 770, united-imaging, Shanghai, China), using a 24-channel head coil. Three-dimensional heavily T2-weighted spectral attenuated inversion recovery (3D-T2-SPAIR, T2) and 3D T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR) imaging were subsequently performed. The scan parameters for the 3D-FLAIR sequence were as follows: voxel size = 0.78 * 0.78 * 1.1 mm, scan time = 6 min and 11 s, time of repetition (TR) = 6500 ms, time of echo (TE) = 286.1 ms, time of inversion = 1950 ms, flip angle = 67°, echo train length = 160 points, slice thickness = 0.6 mm, field of view = 200 * 200 mm, and matrix size = 256 * 256. We used a heavily T2-weighted SPAIR sequence with the detailed scan parameters as follows: voxel size = 0.65 * 0.52 * 0.76 mm, scan time = 4 min and 30 s, TR = 1,300 ms, TE = 254.7 ms, flip angle = 110°, slice thickness = 0.4 mm, field of view = 200 * 200 mm, and matrix size = 384 * 384.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multimodal MRI Protocol for Parkinson's Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI acquisitions, including three-dimensional (3D) T1w, coronal 3D T2w, and a 3D gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequence (3.0 T uMR 770, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China), were performed on a 3-T MRI scanner several days before the day of the surgery. PD patients with severe tremors at rest were scanned while on medication or were injected with diazepam to reduce the possibility of movement artifacts during MRI examinations. Detailed imaging parameters for T1w, T2w, and GRE sequences, including the repetition time (TR), echo time (TE), bandwidth, field of view (FOV), acquisition matrix, voxel size, and scan time are summarized in Table 1. For QSM map calculation, multiecho GRE data were acquired using the susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) + sequence (Ye et al., 2018 ). B0 field maps were extracted using the multidimensional integration method (Ye and Lyu, 2019 ), unwrapped from aliased phases using SPUN (Ye et al., 2019b (link)), and background fields were removed using vSHARP (Li et al., 2014 (link)). QSM maps were obtained by solving the L1 regularization problem, with an extra term for streaking artifact suppression (Ye et al., 2019a ), using the precondition conjugate gradient method. The calculation of B0 and the generation of QSM maps were performed on the postprocessing workstation of the scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Imaging Evaluation of Disc Degeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 2-3 wk, all rats received tail MRI using a magnetic resonance imager (UMR770, United-Imaging, Shanghai, China) and Pfirrmann classification[13 (link)]. Rats with grade III-IV degeneration, indicating a significant decrease in the height of the IV disc space, underwent conventional X-ray examination using an X-ray machine (uDR588i, United-Imaging, Shanghai, China) and molybdenum target X-ray photography using the Mammomat Inspiration (Siemens, Germany) (Figure 1C).
The height of the space between degenerative vertebral segments in the conventional plain X-ray images and molybdenum target plain X-ray images was measured by four clinicians. Specifically, the height of both sides and midpoint of the IV disc space was measured and averaged together (Figure 2)[14 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!