The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pr clone 16

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in United Kingdom

The PR (clone 16) is a piece of laboratory equipment designed for a specific function. It is a precise and reliable instrument used for various scientific applications. The core function of this product is to perform a specific task, but a detailed description without interpretation or extrapolation cannot be provided while maintaining an unbiased and factual approach.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using pr clone 16

1

Comprehensive IHC Biomarker Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In our IHC study, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections obtained from surgical specimens were stained using appropriate antibodies specific for 4 markers: ER (1:100 dilution, clone 6F11; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), PR (clone 16; Novocastra), HER2 (4B5 rabbit monoclonal antibody; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, US), and Ki-67 (MIB-1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The HER2 status was defined as positive with a score of 3+ and negative with a score of 0 or 1+. Tumors with scores of 2+ were analyzed by fluorescent in situ hybridization following the manufacturer's protocol (PathVysion kit; Vysis, Downers Grove, US or HER2 inform; Ventana Medical Systems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Breast Cancer Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously described [17 (link)], we evaluated ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 expression using the following antibodies, ER (1:100 clone 6F11; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), PR (clone 16; Novocastra), HER2 (4B5 rabbit monoclonal antibody; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA), and Ki-67 (MIB-1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). ER- and PR-positive IHC expression was defined according to the modified Allred system: positive, Allred score 3–8 and negative, Allred score 0–2. HER2 status was re-evaluated according to American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline [18 (link)]. HER2 status was considered positive if the score was 3+, and was considered negative with a score of 0 or 1+. Tumors with a score of 2+ underwent FISH or SISH analysis, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (PathVysion kit; Vysis, Downers Grove, IL, USA or HER2 inform; Ventana). Ki-67 expression is presented as the percentage (range 0–100%) of positive tumor cells.
For the molecular subtyping, the following definitions were used: i) Luminal/HER2 negative: ER positive and/or PR positive and HER2 negative; ii) HER2 positive: HER2 positive regardless of ER and PR status; and iii) TNBC: ER negative, PR negative, and HER2 negative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Breast Cancer Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In our immunohistochemistry (IHC) study, core needle biopsy samples were stained using appropriate antibodies specific for four markers: ER (1:100 dilution, clone 6F11; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), PR (clone 16; Novocastra, UK), HER2 (4B5 rabbit monoclonal antibody; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA), and Ki-67 (MIB-1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). ER- and PR-positive were defined as a cutoff value of ≥ 1% positively stained nuclei41 (link), or according to the modified Allred system: positive, Allred scores 2–8,and negative, Allred scores 042 (link). The HER2 status was defined as positive with a score of 3+, and negative with a score of 0 or 1+. Tumors with scores of 2+ were sent for fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis according to the protocol given by the supplier (PathVysion kit; Vysis, Downers Grove, IL, USA, or HER2 inform; Ventana)43 (link). Staining positive for the nuclear antigen Ki-67 was evaluated in a quantitatively and visually way using light microscopes, and the positive tumor cell percentage was reported as the Ki-67 labeling index (LI)44 (link). We considered Ki-67 levels ≥ 14% as high45 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ER (1:100 clone 6F11; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), PR (clone 16; Novocastra), HER2 (4B5 rabbit monoclonal antibody; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA), and Ki-67 (MIB-1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) were stained using formalin fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections as previously described [23 ,24 ]. ER positivity and PR expression on immunohistochemistry were defined according to the modified Allred system. In our study, ER and PR positivity were defined as an Allred score ≥3. HER2 staining was analyzed according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines [25 ]. HER2 immunostaining was considered positive when strong membranous staining (3+) was observed, whereas 0 and 1 + were regarded as negative. The cases showing 2 + HER2 expression were further evaluated for HER2 amplification via silver in situ hybridization. Nuclear positivity of Ki-67 staining was evaluated, and the percentage of positive tumor cell (range 0%–100%) was reported as the Ki-67 labeling index. For the breast cancer subtyping, the following definitions were used: i) luminal/HER2(−): ER positive and/or PR positive, and HER2 negative; ii) HER2(+): HER2 positive regardless of ER and PR status; iii) TNBC: ER negative, PR negative, and HER2 negative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Cancer Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In our immunohistochemistry study, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections obtained from surgical specimens were stained using appropriate antibodies specific for four markers: ER (1:100 dilution, clone 6F11; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), PR (clone 16; Novocastra, UK), HER2 (4B5 rabbit monoclonal antibody; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA), and Ki-67 (MIB-1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). According to the modified Allred system, ER and PR positivity were defined as Allred scores of 3–8, while negativity was defined as Allred scores of 0 and 2, respectively. We considered Allred scores of 7–8 to indicate high expression levels. HER2 status was defined as positive for scores of 3+ and negative for scores of 0 or 1+. Tumors with scores of 2+ were sent for fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis according to the suppliers’ protocols (PathVysion kit; Vysis, Downers Grove, IL, USA, or HER2 inform; Ventana). We defined Ki-67 levels ≥14% as high.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In our immunohistochemical study, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections obtained from surgical specimens were stained using appropriate antibodies specific for the following four markers: ER (1:100 dilution, clone 6F11; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), PR (clone 16; Novocastra), HER2 (4B5 rabbit monoclonal antibody; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA), and Ki-67 (MIB-1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). ER and PR positivity were defined using the modified Allred system as follows: positive, Allred scores 3–8; negative, Allred scores 0 and 2. HER2 status was defined as positive with a score of 3+ and negative with a score of 0 or 1+. Tumors with a score of 2+ were subjected to a silver-enhanced in situ hybridization analysis according to the manufacturer’s protocol (PathVysion kit; Vysis, Downers Grove, IL, USA or HER2 inform; Ventana Medical Systems). The Ki-67 level was considered high when the Ki-67 proliferation index was ≥ 14%. pCR was defined as no evidence of invasive cancer residues in the breast parenchyma and all axillary lymph nodes (ypT0/is, ypN0) based on the pathological evaluation of surgical specimens after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!