The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gelcompar

Manufactured by bioMérieux
Sourced in Belgium

GelCompar is a software tool designed for the analysis and comparison of gel electrophoresis images. It provides a platform for organizing, analyzing, and comparing DNA or protein band patterns generated through various gel-based techniques.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using gelcompar

1

PFGE Analysis of SA Genetic Similarity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of the genetic similarity between SA isolates was performed by PFGE method in accordance with a previously published protocol [11 (link)]. Restriction enzyme digestion was performed with 25 U of SmaI enzyme in Tango buffer (ThermoScientific, USA). Electrophoresis was conducted in a CHEFIII PFGE unit applying the parameters: block 1- starting pulse 5 s, ending pulse 12 s, voltage 6 V/cm, run time 11 h, block 2- starting pulse 20s, ending pulse 60 s, voltage 6 V/cm, run time 13 h. The GelCompar (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) was used for cluster analysis using the Dice coefficient and unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean. Isolates that clustered ≥ 95% were considered as an epidemic clone. S. aureus strain ATCC 11632 was used as reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed routine identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry and biochemical species identification. For MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, we used Biotyper MBT Smart (Bruker Corporation, https://www.bruker.com) with flexControl and MBT Compass version 4.1 software. We considered scores >2.0 high confidence identification and scores of 1.7–2.0 low confidence identification. We used VITEK 2 gram negative identification card (bioMérieux, https://www.biomerieux.com) for biochemical species identification. Phenotypic antimicrobial resistance profiles were determined using disk diffusion. We interpreted breakpoints according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (9 ) standards for Bcc (ceftazidime, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and meropenem) or Enterobacteriaceae (aminoglycosides, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam, and other β-lactams). We used XbaI to digest DNA before using previously described pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) molecular typing principles (10 (link)). We used GelCompar (Applied Maths, http://www.applied-maths.com) to analyze PFGE results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Clonal Spread Analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae were analyzed using the standardized PFGE protocol developed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention by the PulseNet program (version for Escherichia coli). Data from previous studies showed that K. pneumoniae strains isolated in Polish hospitals (mainly from ICUs for adults and neonates and pediatric units) often belong to one clone. For this reason, a PFGE study was performed for this species to check for clonal spreading of strains coming from oral bacteriota samples and HAI cases. Genomic DNA was prepared in situ in agarose blocks and was subsequently digested with restriction enzymes: XbaI (25 U per block, Thermo Scientific. The digested products were separated on a CHEF III PFGE system (Bio-Rad, Warsaw, Poland) in 0.5 × Tris-borate-EDTA buffer at 14 °C at 6 V for 22 h with a starting pulse of 2 s and a final pulse of 35 s. GelCompar (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium) was used for cluster analysis with the unweighted pair group method with an arithmetic mean and the Dice coefficient. Similarity must be > 90% for the pattern to be considered to belong to the same pulsotype. The results of the PFGE analysis are presented for each patient with a number that they were assigned on recruitment (1–56). The term “case” refers to HAI diagnoses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PFGE Analysis of E. coli Transmission

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PFGE was used to determine the possible horizontal transfer of E. coli strains among patients. All isolates were analysed using the standardized PFGE protocol developed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention by the PulseNet program http://ttp://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/pathogens/ecoli.html (accessed: 11.02.2013). Genomic DNA was digested with 10 U XbaI (ThermoScientific, ABO, Gdansk, Poland). The resulting DNA fingerprinting was analysed using the CHEF III PFGE system (BioRad, Warsaw, Poland) in 0.5 Tris–borate–EDTA buffer at 14°C at 6 V for 20 h with a ramped pulse time of 2.2–54.2 s. The GelCompar (Applied Maths) was used for cluster analysis using the Dice coefficient and the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PFGE Protocol for Clonal K. pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All isolates of K. pneumoniae were analyzed using the standardized PFGE protocol developed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by the PulseNet program (version for E. coli). Due to previous studies [14 (link)] showing the possibility of clonal spread of certain K. pneumoniae strains in Polish hospitals, a PFGE study was performed for this species. Genomic DNA was prepared in situ in agarose blocks and was subsequently digested with restriction enzymes: XbaI (25U per block, Thermo Scientific). The digested products were separated on a CHEF III PFGE system (BioRad, Warsaw, Poland) in 0.5 × Tris-borate-EDTA buffer at 14 °C at 6 V for 22 h with a starting pulse of 2s and final pulse of 35s. GelCompar (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium) was used for cluster analysis with the unweighted pair group method with an arithmetic mean and the Dice coefficient. The similarity requirement for the pattern to be considered as belonging to the same type was > 90% (https://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/pathogens/pfge.html).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Staphylococcus aureus Identification and Antibiotic Resistance Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood cultures were performed using the BacT/ALERT Blood Culture System (bioMérieux, USA). Staphylococcus aureus was identified with standard methods including Gram staining, catalase production, and commercial agglutination tests. Susceptibility testing was conducted according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). From June 2011 onward, minimal inhibitory concentration results were interpreted according to the standards of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST).
In MRSA cases, additional tests were performed to detect the presence of aurease (Rapidec Staph, bioMérieux, France), and MRSA-Screens (Denka Seiken, Japan) were used to detect penicillin-binding protein 2a. Most methicillin-resistant isolates were additionally confirmed by PCR for mecA and femA genes as described elsewhere. 23, 24 For MRSA screening, a highly selective enrichment broth was used as described previously in detail. 19 Since 1993, 1 MRSA isolate per patient per episode per year was typed using PFGE and interpreted using GelCompar (Applied Maths, Belgium). All strains were stored at -80°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!