The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using thermo ultimate 3000 uhplc

1

Quantitative Proteomics of MS275-Treated S180 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The S180 cells were treated with 5 μM MS275 or 0.4% (v/v) DMSO as control group for 48-h incubation and the sufficient samples were submitted for iTRAQ quantitative proteomics analysis (BGI, Shenzhen, China). Protein extraction, SDS-PAGE purification, protein digestion and peptide quantification was dealt as reference [1 (link)]. The peptide samples were respectively labeled using the iTRAQ Reagent-4plex Multiplex Kit (AB SCIEX) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The labeled peptide fractionation was carried out by using Shimadzu LC-20 AB liquid phase system with 5  μm 4.6 × 250 mm Gemini C18 column and followed by HPLC (Thermo UltiMate 3000 UHPLC). The nanoliter liquid phase separation end was directly connected to the mass spectrometer with a tandem mass spectrometer Q-Exactive HF X (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA). The MS/MS data were searched against the Mascot database (uniprot-human 20151227.fasta) for peptide identification and quantification. The searching result of peptides was filtered by FDR p value with a cut off of 0.05. Based on statistical dispersion of the dataset, ratio of > 1.5 or < 0.667 was used as a strict significance cutoff to acquire a short list of the differentially distributed proteins as indicated in the data legends.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Peptide Sample Preparation and UHPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dried peptide samples were reconstituted with mobile phase A (2% ACN, 0.1% FA), centrifuged at 20,000 g for 10 min, and the supernatant was taken for injection. Separation was performed on a Thermo UltiMate 3000 UHPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

iTRAQ Proteomics Analysis of Synovial Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
iTRAQ proteomics was applied to analyze synovial tissue of the knee joint from the normal group, model group, and T1 group. The protein extraction, quality control, and proteolysis were performed according to the protocol. The iTRAQ® reagent 8 plex (AB Sciex Pte. Ltd., USA) was used to label peptides. The Shimadzu LC-20AB liquid phase system (Shimadzu, Japan) was used for peptide fractionation, and peptide samples were separated by Thermo UltiMate 3000 UHPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, USA). The peptides separated by liquid phase chromatography were ionized and then passed to a tandem mass spectrometer Q-Exactive HF X (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) for data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode detection.
The raw mass spectrometry (MS) data was converted into Mascot Generic Format (MGF) format, which was then searched by the local Mascot server. In addition, quality control was performed, and IQuant soft was applied to the quantification of proteins [26 (link)]. To assess the confidence of peptides, the Professional Scrum Master™ levels (PSMs) were prefiltered at a PSM-level false discovery rate (FDR) of 1%. The protein FDR was also set at 1% (protein − level FDR ≤ 0.01).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Global Metabolomics Profiling by UHPLC-QTOF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Global metabolomics profiling was performed on a Thermo Q-Exactive Oribtrap mass spectrometer with Thermo Ultimate 3000 UHPLC (Thermo, San Jose, CA) at Southeast Center for Integrated Metabolomics (SECIM) University of Florida. All samples were analyzed in positive and negative heated electrospray ionization with a mass resolution of 35,000 at m/z 200 as separate injections. Separation was achieved on an ACE 18-pfp 100 × 2.1 mm, 2 µm column with mobile phase A as 0.1% formic acid in water and mobile phase B as acetonitrile. This is a polar embedded stationary phase that provides comprehensive coverage, but does have some limitation is the coverage of very polar species. The flow rate was 350 µL/min with a column temperature of 25 °C. 4 µL was injected for negative ions and 2 µL for positive ions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolite Extraction and Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolites were extracted from approximately 5 × 106 cells (grown in cell culture dishes) by the addition of 500 µL of ice‐cold 80% aqueous methanol. Supernatants were combined and filtered using a 3‐kDa ultrafilter (Millipore), dried in a SpeedVac (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and subsequently stored at −80°C. On the day of analysis, the dried extracts were reconstituted in 60 μL of ice‐cold 80% aqueous methanol. A quality control sample was made by combining 5 µL of each sample. Sample analysis was performed using anion‐exchange chromatography (Thermo UltiMate 3000 UHPLC, Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled directly to a high‐resolution Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Q Exactive HF Hybrid Quadrupole‐Orbitrap, Thermo Fisher Scientific) as previously described 22 and detailed in online Supporting Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Targeted Metabolomic Analysis by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on a Thermo q-Exactive Plus mass spectrometer coupled to a Thermo Ultimate 3000 uHPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The HPLC method used a Phenomenex (Torrance, CA) Kinetex C18 column (2.6 µm particle size, 10 nm pore size, 150 mm length, and 2.1 mm internal diameter) at a constant flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. Mobile phase A was 0.1% formic acid in H2O (v/v) and mobile phase B was 0.1% formic acid in CH3CN (v/v). A 10 μL sample was injected onto the column at 0% B and washed at this solvent composition for 3 min. The gradient was first increased to 10% B in 0.1 min and then to 100% B over the next 26.9 min. Detection on the q-Exactive Plus mass spectrometer was performed in positive mode between 300 and 2000 m/z, using an acquisition target of 3E6, and a maximum ion injection time of 200 ms at a resolution of 70,000 for MS and 35,000 for MS/MS data. For MS/MS experiments, [M + H]+ ions were targeted for isolation and fragmentation at a normalized collision energy of 35 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Untargeted Metabolomics Profiling by UHPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Untargeted metabolomics profiling was performed with a Thermo Ultimate 3000 UHPLC and Thermo Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo, San Jose, CA) with the assistance of the Southeast Center for Integrated Metabolomics (SECIM) Core Lab 1 at the University of Florida. All samples were run in positive and negative ionization through heated electrospray as separate injections. Mass spectra analysis had a mass resolution of 35,000 at m/z 200. Separation was achieved on an ACE 18-pfp 100 × 2.1 mm, 2 μm column. Mobile phase A was 0.1% formic acid in water, and mobile phase B was acetonitrile. The flow rate was 350 μL/min, and column temperature was set to 25°C. Two microliters was injected for positive ionization and 4 μL for negative ionization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!