The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Presentation software version 14

Manufactured by Neurobehavioral Systems
Sourced in United States, Canada

Presentation® software version 14.9 is a research and experimentation software tool developed by Neurobehavioral Systems. It provides a platform for creating and managing experimental protocols, stimulus presentations, and data collection. The software supports a wide range of hardware integration and data output formats for scientific research purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using presentation software version 14

1

Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Paradigm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The task is illustrated in Figure 1. Two simultaneous sequences of black capital letters of the Latin alphabet were rapidly (9/s) presented left and right from fixation. The 17’’ screen had a white background (120 cd/m2) and was driven with 100 Hz at about 1.2 m from participants’ faces. Letters were 8.5 mm wide and 11 mm high (0.5° × 0.6° visual angle) with their inner edges 10 mm from fixation (0.6°). Fixation was marked by a small red cross (0.1° × 0.1°) at screen center. In each trial, two targets had to be identified. The first target (T1) was a red letter (24 cd/m2; D, F, G, J, K, or L). The second target (T2) was a blue digit (18 cd/m2; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9). Background stimuli consisted of all other letters in black (standard), or in blue (color lures) or of the digits 1–9 in black (digit lures). Presentation® software, version 14.5, was used for experimental control (Neurobehavioral Systems Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Sequential Reaction Time Task Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SRTT used in the study was a modification of the standard version introduced by Nissen & Bullemer62 (link) and Willingham and coworkers63 (link). The task was programmed by means of the Presentation Software version 14.5 (Neurobehavioral Systems, Inc., Albany, USA) and stimuli were presented on a 17″ computer monitor. Participants were instructed to maintain their gaze during the whole experiment to the middle of the monitor. Detailed description of experimental parameters is presented in Supplementary Methods. To control for eyes fixation to screen centre, an eye-tracker was used (Eye-Tracker 600 Series, Eyegaze Edge, LC Technologies, Inc., Fairfax, USA). If fixation deviated from the screen centre by more than 2.6 cm at trial onset (visual angle larger than 1.3°), a large red exclamation mark appeared for 2 s in the middle of the screen attracting gaze back to the centre. Then the trial was restarted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pavlovian Fear Conditioning and Extinction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants completed a two-day paradigm consisting of habituation and acquisition training on Day 1 and extinction training, reinstatement administration and reinstatement test on Day 2. In the current study, only data from acquisition and extinction training are presented. For both acquisition and extinction training, CS+ and CS− were each presented 14 times in pseudo-randomized order for a duration of 6–8 s (mean duration: 7 s). Inter-trial intervals (ITIs) consisted of a white fixation cross presented for 10–16 s (mean duration: 13 s). Presentation of all stimuli on a grey background and stimulus timing were controlled by Presentation software (Version 14.8, Neurobehavioral Systems, Inc, Albany California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Projection-Based Visual Stimulus Presentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The events were controlled by Presentation Software version 14.8 (Neurobehavioral Systems, Albany, CA, USA) implemented on a computer using Windows 7 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). The stimuli were projected from a liquid crystal projector (DLA-F110; Victor, Yokohama, Japan) at a refresh rate of 60 Hz to a mirror positioned in a scanner in front of the participants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Functional MRI Acquisition and Experimental Setup

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning was performed on a 3 Tesla Trio Scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using an 8-channel head coil. Functional data was acquired using EPI-sequences with a repetition time (TR) of 2.5 s, an echo time (TE) of 30 ms, and a flip angle of 90 degrees. Each volume comprised 37 slices acquired in an axial orientation covering all of the brain, including the midbrain, but sparing parts of the cerebellum. The presentation of the task and recording of behavioral responses were performed with Presentation® software version 14.9 (Neurobehavioral Systems, Albana, Canada). Subjects saw the experiment via video goggles (Nordic NeuroLab, Bergen, Norway) and gave their responses by response grips (Nordic NeuroLab, Bergen, Norway) using the index fingers of both hands.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Facial Action Monitoring during Stimulus Presentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presentation of stimuli was controlled by Presentation® software version 14.9 (Neurobehavioral Systems) implemented on a Windows computer (HP Z200 SFF, Hewlett-Packard). The stimuli were presented on a 19-inches CRT monitor (HM903D-A, Iiyama). The facial actions of participants were monitored through a hidden digital camera (QuickCam IM, Logitech).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Functional MRI Paradigm for Apparent Motion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects completed four functional runs of 15 minutes each. In the main fMRI, flicker control, and replication experiments, subjects viewed stimuli on an fMRI compatible screen positioned in the bore of the magnet at a distance of 110 cm (screen resolution: 1024 × 768). We used Neurobehavioral systems Presentation® software (Version 14.9) to present the paradigm, with a screen refresh rate of 60 Hz.We presented the three apparent motion conditions and a baseline condition of 25 times per run and 100 times across the whole experiment. We presented the two mapping conditions 12 times each per run and 48 times across the experiment. We used a randomisation scheme to order the trials, ensuring that no triplets of conditions were repeated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

fMRI Study of Cognitive Processing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning was performed on a 1.5T Avanto scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using standard scanning parameters for the acquisition of 31 axial EPI slices with a TR of 2.5s (for details see Supplementary Material). The experiment was presented by Presentation® software version 14.9 (Neurobehavioral Systems, Albana, Canada) via video goggles (Nordic Neuro Lab, Norway) and subjects gave their answer by button presses on MRI-suited response grips (Nordic Neuro Lab).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Neuroimaging Setup at Donders Centre

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All neuroimaging took place at the Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging (DCCN, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) using a Siemens Trio 3 T whole body MR scanner (Erlangen, Germany) with a thirty-two channel head coil. An LCD projector presented the stimuli onto a rear-projection screen mounted at the head end of the scanner bore; screen size = 38.6 × 29.1 cm; default resolution = 1024 × 768; refresh rate = 60 Hz; and distance from screen to pupils = 80 cm. Participants viewed the stimuli through a custom made mirror positioned on the head coil. All stimuli were delivered using Presentation software version 14.9 (Neurobehavioral Systems, Davis, CA, USA) run on a Dell Workstation (Austin, TX, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!