The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss software version 17.1 for windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS software version 17.1 for Windows is a statistical analysis software package designed to assist with data management, analysis, and visualization. It provides a wide range of statistical procedures and techniques to help users understand and interpret data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

7 protocols using spss software version 17.1 for windows

1

Cost Analysis of Patient Cohort

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Characteristics of the study population were analyzed using descriptive statistics: quantitative variables were described by median, mean, and standard deviation (±SD), while categorical variables were described by count and percentage. The significance of differences between mean costs was verified using nonparametric test for independent samples.
Linear regression analysis was also used to investigate the impact of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics on the dependent cost variables. All analyses were performed using SPSS software version 17.1 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Trends in Imaging Utilization and Costs for Cancer Diagnosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were used to define patients' demographics and comorbid conditions stratified by year of diagnosis. χ2 statistics for trend and linear-by-linear association were used to compare distributions of categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Statistical significance was defined as a two-sided P-value <0.05. The number of routine and new imaging tests per thousand patients by year from diagnosis was calculated and the percentage of patients who received one or more procedures was plotted. For each year of diagnosis, the costs of imaging procedures are expressed in euros as mean cost per patient. Changes in number of procedures and in related cost per patient from 2001 to 2010 are expressed as mean annual rate increases. We estimated the mean annual increases separately for each imaging test using a generalised linear model with a Poisson count distribution and log link for counts, and a log link and normal distribution for costs. All mean annual increase estimates were adjusted for age, geographic location and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Modelling and statistical analysis were carried out using R version 2.12.1 (IBM SPSS Statistics - Integration Plug-In for R for SPSS Statistics 20 software) and the SPSS software version 17.1 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Spatial Analysis of Antibiotic Prescription Rates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The age-adjusted prevalence rates were categorized into quintiles and mapped by the patient’s municipality of residence. Values were presented as mean ± standard deviation (STD). The coefficient of variation (CV) was also calculated as a measure of dispersion (CV = STD/mean). Confidence intervals (CIs) were not calculated as they were not relevant due to the high number of individuals in the study population. The relationship between prevalence rates for children, adults, and the older adults was estimated using the non-parametric Spearman rank correlation test.
A logistic regression analysis was performed for each of the most common antibiotic classes to evaluate the association between receiving an antibiotic prescription and gender, age group and municipality type.
All analyses were performed using SPSS software version 17.1 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA), and a p-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Maps for antibiotic prevalence rates were generated by a custom script that uses an Application Programming Interface (API) offered by MapBox (www.mapbox.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Descriptive Analysis of Polypharmacy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Characteristics of the study population were analysed using descriptive statistics: quantitative variables were described by means and standard deviations while categorical variables were described by counts and percentages. In the case of categorical variables, crosstabulations with chi-square tests were used for comparing the differences between age group and polypharmacy group. All analyses were performed using SPSS software version 17.1 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistically significance was set up at p-value < 0.05
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mapping Antibiotic Prevalence and Consumption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The age-adjusted prevalence rates were categorized into quintiles and mapped by the patient’s municipality of residence. Antibiotic consumption (DID) was also mapped for the different municipalities.
Differences in prevalence rates between each LHU and the standard population were expressed as prevalence ratios (PRs).
PRs indicate whether the prevalence rate at LHU level was higher or lower than that of the standard population. Confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using standard methods (at 95% confidence level).35
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were conducted to evaluate 1) the association between the highest and lowest antibiotic prevalence rates (ie, highest vs lowest quintile of prevalence) and 2) some determinants such as municipality type (rural or urban), average annual income level per capita, and number of general practitioners (GPs) and average annual medication consumption per 1000 inhabitants.
All analyses were performed using the SPSS software Version 17.1 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and a P-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Maps for antibiotic prevalence rates were generated by a custom script that uses an Application Programming Interface (API) offered by MapBox (www.mapbox.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Prevalence Rate Differences by Gender

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences in the prevalence rate between males and females were expressed as crude and age-adjusted RR with 95% confidence interval (CI) (ratio of the prevalence in females and males). Age standardization was performed by direct standardization, where the Italian population recorded on 1 January 2018 (29,427,607 males, 31,056,366 females, 60,483,973 total, according to http://demo.istat.it/pop2018/index.html [29 ]) was used as the standard population. Age was categorized into the following groups: 0–6, 7–14, 15–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75–84, and ≥ 85 years.
Ninety-five percent CI of crude and age-adjusted Risk Ratios (RRs) were computed using standard methods [30 ]. Data management was performed with Microsoft SQL server (version 2018) (Penton, USA, Fort Collins, Colorado), and all analyses were performed using the SPSS software version 17.1 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value of <0.05 denoted statistically significant differences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Prevalence of Antidepressant Use in Older Adults

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prevalent users were calculated as subject 65 years of age or older receiving at least one prescription of AD. Prevalence of AD use was evaluated per calendar year and it was calculated as the number of prevalent users divided by the number of all resident subjects alive in the same year. Prevalence rates were expressed as percentage. Prevalence rates were stratified by year and age group (65-74; 75-84; >85). Patterns of use of drug class for cardiovascular prevention were calculated and stratified by age group and calendar year.
Characteristics of the study population were analyzed using descriptive statistics: quantitative variables were described by means and standard deviations while categorical variables were described by counts and percentages. Chi square test for trend was used to assess the statistical significance among patients exposed and not exposed to ADs for patients’ characteristics (age, gender, pattern prescription) and years. All analyses were performed using SPSS software version 17.1 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!