The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using folin ciocalteu solution

1

Pomegranate Peel Powder Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pomegranate peel powder was purchased from Packtin, s.r.l. (Reggio Emilia, IT). The plants from which the powder was obtained belong to the Wonderful and Ako cultivars, with an average age of 10 years, grown in organic farming. Fertilizers with very similar values of potassium, phosphorus, and nitrogen (20 g per plant every 2 months) were used. The soil was drained to avoid stagnation. Once produced, the PPP was stored up to 18 months in a cool and dry place.
Nitric acid was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Methanol, acetonitrile, 2-propanol were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Folin–Ciocalteu solution, sodium carbonate, gallic acid, Methanol (HPLC grade), acetonitrile (LC-MS grade), phosphoric acid 85%, Luperox® TBH70X tert-butyl hydroperoxide solution (TBH) and 20,70-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (Milan, Italy). The chemicals and solvents were analytical grade reagents or LC-MS grade. CellTiter 96® Aqueous One Solution Assay (MTS) was purchased from Promega (Milan, Italy). The water used in all experiments was obtained from Millipore Milli-Q (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). All sample solutions were stored at −20 °C until analysis and were used within three days of preparation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Total Polyphenol Content in SBP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total polyphenol content (TPC) of SBP was determined by testing on a laboratory scale with some modifications in volume and concentration referring to the method of Singh et al. [36 ]. Briefly, 50 μL of the SBP solution (1 mg/mL; DW) was reacted with 100 μL of Na2CO3 (2% in DW; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution and 50 μL of Folin–Ciocalteu solution (0.2 N in DW; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), mixed, and left in the dark. After 10 min, the absorbance was measured at 720 nm using a spectrophotometer (LABTECH Corp., Ortenberg, Germany), and the results are presented as the gallic acid equivalence value (GAE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Determination of Total Tannins in Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method of Petchidurai (2019), with minor modifications, was used for the determination of total tannins [25 (link)]. Thus, 0.1 g of extract were dissolved in 10 mL of Folin Ciocalteu solution (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Munich, Germany) diluted with water 1:20 (v/v). The obtained mixture was incubated for 3 min at room temperature, followed by the addition of 2 mL of Na2CO3 35% aqueous solution. The final solution was re-incubated for 30 min before reading the absorbance at 725 nm using a Specord 205 UV-VIS spectrophotometer from Analytik Jena Inc. (Jena, Germany). The total tannin content was expressed on the basis of the tannic acid standard curve, which was indicated in mg/gram in the range 20–200 mg/g.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antioxidant Compound Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morin hydrate and resveratrol were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (TCI) (Tokyo, Japan). Quercetin, Folin–Ciocalteu solution, 2,20-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS), 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ferric chloride, ferrous sulfate, sodium carbonate, sodium acetate, aluminum trichloride, and potassium persulfate were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), RPMI-1640 medium, and penicillin–streptomycin were purchased from GIBCO Invitrogen™ (Grand Island, NY, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was obtained from Biochrom AG (Berlin, Germany). Protein markers, 0.5 M Tris–HCl, pH 6.8 solution, 1 M Tris–HCl, pH 8 solution, and 30% acrylamide/bis solution, were purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Richmond, CA, USA). Ethanol, n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Labscan (Dublin, Ireland). HPLC grade Ethanol was purchased from Carlo Erba Reagents (Cornaredo, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPTLC-Based Bioactive Compound Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analytical grade methanol (MeOH) for extraction, as well as acetonitrile (ACN), acetic acid (A.A), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), and vanillin for high-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) analysis and ethanol for bioassays were purchased from Merck (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). For free radical scavenging and total phenolic content assays, Folin–Ciocalteu solution, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), gallic acid, and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antioxidant Evaluation of Cosmetic Ingredients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments have been performed using analytical-grade chemicals. Folin-Ciocalteu solution, gallic acid, sodium carbonate, 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid 114 (Trolox), and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and all HPLC Standards of gallic acid (3,4,5-Trihydroxybenzoic acid), p-Hydroxybenzoic acid, (+)-catechin hydrate, protocatechuic, rutin hydrate, quercetin (3,3’,4’,5,7-Pentahydroxyflavone), chlorogenic acid, p-coumaric acid, caffeic acid (3,4-Dihydroxycinnamic acid), trans-cinnamic acid, ellagic acid, resveratrol, and sinapic acid (3,5-Dimethoxy-4-hydroxycinnamic acid) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany). All assay kits for FRAP, CUPRAC, and proanthocyanin were purchased from Bioquochem (Asturias, Spain). As for the solvents, aqua and O-Phosphoric Acid 85% extra pure were provided by Fisher Scientific (Janssen Pharmaceuticalaan, Belgium), and Acetonitrile was provided by LiChrosolv® (Darmstadt, Germany). Polyoxyethylene-20 (Tween 20) was obtained from Biotech (Markham, ON, Canada). A basic cream formula and two commercial exfoliating scrubs were purchased from a local store (Beirut, Lebanon) and used as positive controls, one containing 5% sugar and the other containing 5% raspberry seed powder and Argania spinosa shell powder.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Polyphenols and Flavonoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The polyphenol and flavonoid contents of the twigs and roots were analyzed using a colorimetric method. The total polyphenol content was determined by reacting 10 μL of the sample with a 2% Na2CO3 solution for 3 min at room temperature and then adding 10 μL of a 50% Folin–Ciocalteu solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After a reaction time of 3 min, the absorbance was measured at 750 nm, and the concentration was calculated. To measure the flavonoids, 100 μL of DW and 6 μL of 5% NaNO2 (Sigma-Aldrich) were added to the sample (10 μL) and allowed to react for 5 min. Next, 12 μL of AlCl3-6H2O (Sigma-Aldrich) 10% solution was added, and the reaction was allowed to continue for another 5 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 1 M NaOH (40 μL) and the absorbance was measured at 510 nm. Gallic acid and catechin (Sigma-Aldrich) were used as standards for the quantification of the polyphenols and flavonoids, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Total Phenolic Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total phenolic content was determined according to Koç et al. (2010) (link) with modifications. Fresh leaf samples (0.1 g) were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. They were mixed with 1.5 mL of extraction solution (50% (v/v) methanol and 1% (v/v) HCl). Samples were extracted in a boiling bath at 80°C for 15 min.
Next 0.02 mL of the leaf extracts (diluted in 0.08 mL extraction solution) were mixed with 0.7 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu solution (Sigma-Aldrich®), and diluted at the proportion of 1:10, and 0.7 mL of 6% (w/v) Na 2 CO 3 . Samples were incubated at room temperature and in the dark for 1 h before being subjected to absorbance measurements at 765 nm. Gallic acid was used as a standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Determination of Total Polyphenol Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total polyphenol content (TPC) in the samples was determined using the method described by Singh et al. [22 (link)]. Briefly, 50 μL of the CJB solution (1 mg/mL; DW) was reacted with 100 μL of Na2CO3 (2% in DW; Sigma-Aldrich) solution and 50 μL of the Folin–Ciocalteu solution (0.2 N; Sigma-Aldrich), blended, and preserved for 10 min. The absorbance was measured at 720 nm using a spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer), and the results are presented as the gallic acid equivalence value (GAE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Total Phenol Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total phenol content was measured according to [87 ] with modifications. Four replications per genotype and treatment were frozen, ground in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C. Samples (0.1 g of leaves) were mixed with 1.5 mL of 80% methanol (v/v) and extracted in an ultrasound bath at room temperature for 30 min. After that, leaf extract was diluted in extraction solution (dilution 1:4). When samples were diluted, 0.7 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu solution (Sigma-Aldrich®; 1:10 dilution), and 0.7 mL of 6% (w/v) Na2CO3 were added to samples and were incubated at room temperature in dark conditions for 1 h before measuring the absorbance at 765 nm. Standard curve was determined by the content of gallic acid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!