The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gf f glass microfiber filter

Manufactured by Cytiva
Sourced in United Kingdom

GF/F glass microfiber filters are a type of laboratory filtration equipment designed for the separation and retention of particulate matter from liquid samples. These filters are composed of borosilicate glass fibers, providing high mechanical strength and chemical resistance. They are intended for general-purpose filtration applications in research and analytical laboratories.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using gf f glass microfiber filter

1

Aqueous Analyte Enrichment via SPE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HLB™ cartridges were conditioned twice with 2 mL methanol, and twice with 2 mL sub-boiled water. The water samples were filtered using a suction filtration set-up with Whatman GF/F glass microfiber filter (0.7 μm pore size, 4.7 cm diameter). Aliquots of 100 mL water samples were transferred into separate brown bottles and were spiked with 20 μL enrichment control standard solution. The water samples were passed through immediately after spiking into the conditioned SPE cartridges using the SPE-manifold that was connected to a vacuum. The flow of water was maintained at 0.05 to 0.1 mL/s (1–2 drops/s). The cartridges were then dried using a stream of N2 gas for 15 to 30 min. The enriched SPE cartridges were wrapped with aluminum foil and were stored at −20 °C until GC-MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optimizing HPLC Chromatographic Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detailed information about measurements of analysis on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) are shown in Table S1 and previous studies [13 (link),17 (link)]. Briefly, all the chromatographic measurements were performed with a flow rate of 1 mL/min, and UV detection wavelengths at 214 and 223 nm. The injected sample volume was 20 μL. The mobile phase for case study 1 was methanol and 100 mM tris buffer at pH values of 2.5 and 7.2. For case study 2, gradient elution was carried out with solvent A (water with 0.12% trifluoroacetic acid) and solvent B (acetonitrile with 0.10% trifluoroacetic acid). The mobile phase was filtered through a GF/F glass microfiber filter (Whatman, Maidstone, UK) and subsequently degassed with helium during the analysis. Peptide samples were dissolved in water containing 0.10% (v/v) of trifluoroacetic acid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ekoln Basin Water Microbial Community Cultivation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On October 27th 2014 eighty litres of water were collected from the Ekoln basin in Lake Mälaren, Sweden (59°45′48.99″N, 17°34′33.09″E). The water was transported back to the laboratory within one hour and stored at 4 °C until processing.
The growth medium was prepared by sterile-filtering the water through 0.2 µm membrane filters (Pall corporation), followed by autoclaving. The medium was then stored at 4 °C until use and autoclaved again just before use. This procedure caused a pH change from pH 7.8 to pH 8.8, which was compensated with hydrochloric acid.
For the inoculum (initial community), 20 L of water was collected on November 10th, 2014 from the same location (8.2 °C in situ temperature), filtered through a GF/F glass microfiber filter (0.7 µm, Whatman) to remove bacterial grazers and stored at 13 °C to acclimatize the bacterial communities for 2 days before starting the experiment. A daily 20% medium exchange was performed to avoid nutrient depletion. The culture medium removed during this process was used to measure community parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Sampling and Analyzing Surface Water DOC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All water samples were sampled in the surface water (25 cm) by acid‐washed LDPE bottles. In Finland (NT[L‐mix]), we sampled monthly in winter and fall, fortnightly in spring and every week in summer (2018–2020). In Sweden (C2[S‐forest], C4[S‐mire] and C6[M‐mix]), water samples were collected monthly during winter, every 2 weeks during summer and fall, and every third day during the spring flood (2016–2018). Water samples were filtered immediately after sampling by a filtration system made of glass using Whatman GF/F Glass Microfiber Filters (pore size 0.45 μm), which had been rinsed by the sample water before filtration. All samples were frozen until further DOC analysis.
In Finland, DOC concentrations were determined by thermal oxidation coupled with infrared detection (Multi N/C 2100, Analytik Jena, Germany) following acidification with phosphoric acid. In Sweden, after all samples were acidified with H3PO4, DOC concentrations were measured by catalytic oxidation combustion (Shimadzu TOC‐5000, Kyoto, Japan) (Laudon et al., 2011 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Concentration and Toxin Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subsamples of 2 mL from each exponentially growing culture were fixed in acidic Lugol’s iodine solution and the cell concentration was then estimated using Sedgwick–Rafter chambers. Other subsamples of 40 mL of the same culture were filtered through GF/F glass microfiber filters 25-mm in diameter (Whatman, Maidstone, England) using a vacuum pump; the residual medium volume was estimated using glass graduated cylinders. Each cell-containing filter was placed in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube to which 750 µL of 0.05 M acetic acid was then added. The sample was then sonicated (1 min, 50 Watts), centrifuged at 17,968× g for 10 min, and the supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5-mL Eppendorf tube and processed as described above. The supernatants were combined (final volume 1500 µL) and kept at −20 °C until toxin analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phytoplankton Stoichiometry Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the impact of the treatments on the elemental stoichiometry of phytoplankton communities, samples of 200 mL were filtered at the onset and the end of the incubation period on pre-combusted and pre-washed GF/F glass microfiber filters (Whatman, 25 mm, pore size 0.7 μm). All filters were stored individually in Eppendorf tubes at −20°C. For POC and PON analyses, filters were dried for at least 48 h at 60°C in a drying chamber before being wrapped in tin foil and analyzed with an elemental analyzer (Elementar vario MICRO cube). Particulate P was measured by spectrometric determination (Thermo Scientific Multiskan Spectrum) of orthophosphate (Grasshoff et al., 1999 (link)). Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN), phosphorus (DIP) and silicate (DSi) were measured at the beginning of the experiment and after the 72-h incubation period to evaluate nutrient changes in our treatments. A volume of 50 mL was filtered through nylon membrane filters (Merck, 47 mm, pore size 0.2 μm) and stored at −20°C. The samples were measured with an autoanalyzer (Alliance Instruments GmbH) after a modified method after Grasshoff (Seal/Alliance methods; (Grasshoff et al., 1999 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Half-cell Characterization of Niobium Oxide Anodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For half-cell test, K metal and bm- or meso-Nb2O5/C were used as counter and working electrode, respectively. The battery performance of half-cell was evaluated in a half-cell configuration using CR2032-type coin cells, which were assembled in Ar-filled glove box. The separator was GF/F glass microfiber filters (Whatman, USA). The electrolyte was 1 M potassium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (KFSI) dissolved in a mixture (1:1, v/v) of ethylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate. The working electrode was prepared via typical slurry and casting method. The slurry was made using mixture of 70 wt % bm-Nb2O5/C, 20 wt % super-p, and 10 wt % carboxyl methyl cellulose and then pasted on Cu foil. The galvanostatic electrochemical test was assessed by a WBCS-3000 battery cycler (WonATech Co., Korea) in the potential range of 0.01 to 3 V (versus K/K+). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was conducted via the potentiostat (Reference 600, Gamry Instruments, USA) with an amplitude of 5 mV from 105 to 0.001 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measuring Phosphorus, Carbon, and Chlorophyll

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total phosphorus (TP) was measured using the molybdenum-blue method, after potassium persulfate digestion. DOC was measured on a TOC1010 total carbon analyzer (OI Analytical) using a high-temperature sodium persulfate oxidation method. For Chla determinations, we filtered one liter of water on 47mm-diameter GF-F glass microfiber filters (Whatman), extracted the filter in hot ethanol, stored it overnight at 4°C, then determined the absorbance of the extract at 665nm and 750nm, using a UV/Vis UltroSpec 2100 spectrophotometer (Biochrom Ltd.). We have used this estimate for all subsequent analyses, but note that there was good agreement between the spectrophotometric and the HPLC-based chlorophyll estimate described in the previous section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DOC Concentration Analysis by HTCO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water was filtered through 0.7 µm GF/F glass microfiber filters (Whatman, pre-combusted 400°C, 4 h), acidified with HCl (25%, analysis grade, Carl Roth) to pH 2 and stored at 4°C in the dark. Analysis of DOC concentrations was performed via high-temperature catalytic oxidation method45 (link) using a Shimadzu (Japan) TOC-VCPH/CPN Total Organic Carbon Analyzer equipped with ASI-V auto sampler. We controlled the accuracy of the measurement for every run by analyzing deep-sea reference samples provided by the University of Miami (Dennis Hansell). The error of DOC was below 2.8 µmol C L-1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

  Request a quote for « Gf f glass microfiber filter »