The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

81 protocols using avastin

1

Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients were informed about the side effects and risks associated with IVB (Avastin; Genentech Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA) therapy and informed consent forms were obtained. All injections were done in sterile conditions. Before injection, the eyelids were cleaned with 10% povidone iodine (Betadine; Purdue Pharma, Stamford, CT, USA) and the conjunctival sac with 5% povidone iodine. After placing a sterile cover, IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) was injected using a 30-gauge needle inserted 3.5 mm from the limbus in pseudophakic patients and 4 mm from the limbus in phakic patients. Patients used topical 0.5% moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution (Vigamox®, Alcon Laboratories Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) for 1 week after injection. Patients were examined monthly after the first injection and repeated injections were administered if necessary. Loss of a line or more in visual acuity and the presence of subretinal hemorrhage, intraretinal cyst, and/or subretinal fluid were defined as criteria for repeated treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative treatment of macular edema from retinal vein occlusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We included treatment-naïve patients with MO due to CRVO or BRVO that commenced treatment at FRB! centres where the dexamethasone implant (0.7 mg DEX implant; Ozurdex; Allergan, Inc, Irvine, CA) or VEGF inhibitors including ranibizumab (0.5 mg Lucentis, Genentech Inc/Novartis), bevacizumab (1.25 mg Avastin; Genentech, Inc., CA, USA/Roche, Basel, Switzerland) or aflibercept (2 mg Eylea, Bayer) were available as first-line therapy in Spain, France, Italy or the UK between March 1st, 2012, and March 1st, 2022. The study period extended from the first injection (baseline visit) until the 12-month visit (365± 30 days). Participants had at least 3 visits in the first year. Eyes with hemicentral vein occlusion were excluded. “Completers” were defined by follow-up ≥ 335 days. “Adjunctive therapy” was defined by anti-VEGF injections in DEX eyes and steroid injections in eyes initially treated with VEGF inhibitors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lenvatinib and Atezo/Bev for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The majority of patients with an HCC nodule received oral administration of lenvatinib (Lenvima®, Eisai, Tokyo, Japan) at a dose of 8 mg/day for those with a bodyweight < 60 kg or 12 mg/day for those weighing ≥ 60 kg. The patients also received intravenous administration of atezolizumab (Tecentriq®, F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland/Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA) (1200 mg) and bevacizumab (Avastin®; Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA) (15 mg/kg) every three weeks. The occurrence of unacceptable or serious adverse events (AEs) or significant clinical tumor progression led to treatment being discontinued. Based on the dosing guidelines for lenvatinib and Atezo/Bev, the dose of lenvatinib was reduced, or treatment was discontinued if a patient developed a severe AE (i.e., ≥grade 3) or any unacceptable grade 2 drug-related AE. The National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 [31 ], was used to assess the severity of the AEs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Outcomes of CSDME Management

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All eligible eyes with treatment‐naïve CSDME and good vision at baseline visit (as defined above) from 1 January 2010 to 31 March 2018 were considered for the study, thereby allowing at least 24 months of observation after the initial management decision. The 24‐month end‐point was considered to be the closest visit to 730 days of follow‐up ±30 days. Eligible eyes that received any intravitreal treatment, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors (ranibizumab [0.5mg Lucentis, Genentech Inc/Novartis], aflibercept [2mg Eylea, Bayer] or bevacizumab [1.25mg Avastin, Genentech Inc/Roche]) or steroid implant (dexamethasone [700µg Ozurdex intravitreal implant, Allergan) and/or macular laser photocoagulation at the baseline visit were defined as “initially treated eyes”. Initially observed eyes were defined as eligible eyes initially observed (i.e. no treatment received) for at least 4 months. There were no randomization for the management allocation and no specific management protocols, so the decision to treat or observe at baseline or during the follow‐up was determined by the physician based on symptoms, VA and OCT at the discretion of the physician in consultation with the patient, thereby reflecting routine clinical practice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Subconjunctival Bevacizumab Injection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the operating room, subjects received bilateral subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab (100 μL, 2.5 mg/0.1 mL, Avastin; Genentech) with a 29 G needle (1 mL; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Before the injection, a drop of ropivacaine hydrochloride (Benoxil; Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) was instilled in the conjunctival sac to serve as a topical anesthetic. All the injection sites were identical, which were 3 mm beneath the inferior rim of cornea. A drop of levOfloxacin eye drop (Ofloxacin; Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) was applied to the eye immediately after the injection. All the injections were performed by the same doctor (WQ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Retrospective Analysis of Imatinib Therapy for Patients with Multi-Vessel Pulmonary Vascular Stenosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed a single center retrospective cohort analysis of all patients with multi-vessel PVS (gradient ≥ 4 mmHg by echocardiography or catheterization) and disease recurrence who received imatinib mesylate (Gleevec®, Novartis Inc., Basel, Switzerland) drug therapy from March 2009 to November 2019 as a part of a multimodal treatment plan. Patients who received bevacizumab (Avastin®, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA) in addition to imatinib mesylate at the start of therapy were also included. Patients were identified using our institutional PVS database and included those who participated in our prospective study [9 (link)] and those treated after the trial stopped enrollment. There have been no substantive changes to our therapeutic protocol for patients with PVS since the conclusion of the trial. Patients were categorized as either having single ventricle or 2-ventricle physiology at start of imatinib mesylate therapy. Patients who underwent a bi-ventricular conversion procedure prior to initiation of therapy were included in the 2-ventricle group. Only patients who had longitudinal follow-up at Boston Children’s Hospital were included. This study was approved by the Boston Children’s Hospital Institutional Review Board and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluation of Sorafenib, Bevacizumab, and Fucoidan in HUH-7 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HUH-7 was purchased from Vacsera (Giza, Egypt), sorafenib p- Toluenesulfonate salt was purchased from LC Laboratories (Woburn, MA, United States), Avastin® (bevacizumab, Genentech, United States) was purchased, in its formulated commercial preparation, from a community Pharmacy (Cairo, Egypt) and fucoidan extracted from Laminaria Japonica was purchased as a crude extract from Buchem BV (Holland). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) medium and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Gibco®, Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States. Antibiotic-antimycotic mixture (100 U/ml of penicillin, 0.1 U/ml streptomycin and 0.25 μg/ml of Amphotericin B) was purchased from Lonza®, Walkersville, MD, United States. All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, United States unless otherwise specified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Safety Assessment of Anti-VEGF Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Safety assessments included: vital signs and physical examination, electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory tests, fundus photography, lumbar puncture, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, magnetic resonance angiography, formation of anti-VEGF antibodies [using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay develop by the Sponsor with a sensitivity of 10–32 ng/ml of anti-hVEGF165 in human plasma using Avastin (Genentech) as control], ALS functional rating scale-revised score, slow vital capacity and EuroQol five-dimension scale.
An autopsy was performed in 6 of the 17 patients who died during the course of the sNN0029-001 or sNN0029-002 continuation study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Outcomes of Anti-VEGF vs. Dexamethasone for CME in BRVO/CRVO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study design was an institutional, retrospective, register-based, observational study. Patients were admitted for the management of CME secondary to BRVO or CRVO in the Department of Ophthalmology, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland. All patients included in the retrospective analysis were treatment-naïve regarding intravitreal medication. The diagnosis of BRVO/CRVO was carried out by a physician specialized in its diagnosis and treatment. The choice of therapies between three monthly anti-VEGF injections with bevacizumab (Avastin®; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA) or single DEX implant (Ozurdex®; Allergan, Plc, Dublin, Ireland) was at the discretion of the treating physician. Main outcome measures were central retinal thickness (CRT), IOP, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1 and 3 months. The study was conducted as monitoring of clinical practice, and therefore informed patient consent was not required. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Research Director and Chief Medical Officer of the Kymenlaakso Central Hospital. Confidentiality of the patient records was maintained when the clinical data were entered into a computer-based standardized data entry for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Management of Recurrent Macular Edema

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macular edema was defined as a CMT ≥ 300 μm based on the ETDRS protocol, which involved segmentation of the macula into a central circle, inner ring, and outer ring of 1-, 3-, and 6-mm diameters. The CMT was measured by calculating the average retinal thickness in a circle of 1 mm diameter centered on the fovea, and measuring the distance between the first signal from the vitreoretinal interface and the outer border of the retinal pigment epithelium. Recurrence of ME was defined as the reappearance of ME in eyes with previously resolved ME (CMT < 300 μm).
Macular edema was treated with as-needed intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents, bevacizumab (1.25 mg; Avastin, Genentech, San Francisco, CA, USA) or ranibizumab (Lucentis, 0.5 mg; Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA). If three consecutive monthly anti-VEGF injections failed to resolve ME, the patient was switched to intravitreal dexamethasone implant or triamcinolone acetonide injections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!