The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cvi42 post processing software

Sourced in Canada

Cvi42 is a post-processing software solution developed by Circle Cardiovascular Imaging. The software is designed to facilitate the analysis and visualization of cardiovascular imaging data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using cvi42 post processing software

1

Cardiac MRI Protocol for UK Biobank

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The UK Biobank CMR protocol has been described in detail elsewhere [18 (link)]. Briefly, all examinations were performed on a wide-bore 1.5 Tesla scanner (MAGNETOM Aera, Syngo Platform VD13A, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). For cardiac function, long-axis cines and a complete short-axis stack of balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cines, covering the left and right ventricle were acquired.
Typical parameters were as follows: TR/TE = 2.6/1.1ms, flip angle 80°, Grappa factor 2, voxel size 1.8 mm x 1.8 mm x 8 mm (6 mm for long axis). The actual temporal resolution of 32 ms was interpolated to 50 phases per cardiac cycle (~20 ms). No signal or image filtering was applied besides distortion correction.
Analysis of the left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), left atrium (LA) and right atrium (RA) for all CMR examinations were performed manually by observers across two core laboratories according to pre-approved standard operating procedures using cvi42 post-processing software (Version 5.1.1, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Canada). LV papillary muscles were included in blood pool volumes and excluded from LV mass. Detailed descriptions of analysis methodology, including exemplar contours and intra- and inter-observer variability, have been previously described [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cardiac MRI Ventricular Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CMR scans of the first 5,065 UKB participants that completed the imaging study were manually analyzed across two core laboratories (London, Oxford) using a pre-defined standard operating procedure, which is detailed elsewhere (22 (link)). In brief, left and right ventricular (LV, RV) endocardial contours and LV epicardial contours were drawn in end-systole and end-diastole on the short axis stack images using the CVI42 post-processing software (Version 5.1.1, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Canada). These contours were used to define three regions of interest (ROIs) for radiomics analysis: RV blood pool, LV blood pool, and LV myocardium. All acquisitions were ECG gated and thus end-diastole was defined as the first phase in the sequence. End-systole was defined as the frame with smallest LV cavity area by visual assessment detected at the mid-cavity level. Papillary muscles were considered part of the blood pool. Slices with more than 50% circumferential LV myocardium were included in LV contours. RV volume was defined as areas below the pulmonary valve plane identified by visual assessment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

UK Biobank Cardiovascular MRI Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The UK Biobank CMR protocol has been described in detail elsewhere [16 (link)]. Briefly, all examinations were performed on a wide-bore 1.5 Tesla scanner (MAGNETOM Aera, Syngo Platform VD13A, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). For cardiac function, long axis cines and a complete short axis stack of balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cines, covering the left and right ventricle were acquired.
Analysis of the cardiac chambers for all CMR examinations was performed manually across two core laboratories according to pre-approved standard operating procedures using cvi42 post-processing software (Version 5.1.1, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Canada) by observers blinded to all exposures. LV papillary muscles were included in blood pool volumes and excluded from LV mass. Detailed descriptions of analysis methodology, including reference ranges, exemplar contours and intra- and inter-observer variability, have been previously described [17 (link)]. The CMR parameters examined in this study were left ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, stroke volume, ejection fraction and mass and left atrial maximal volume.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

CMR Image Analysis by Certified Operators

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CMR studies were analysed off-line using cvi42 post-processing software (Version 5.1.1, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Canada) by two EACVI CMR Level 3 certified operators (F.R. and N.A.), blinded to clinical and echocardiographic data. Ventricular volumes and function, as well as LV mass and atrial dimensions, were determined using balanced SSFP cine images as described previously.14 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

LV Myocardial Segmentation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The manual contouring process was performed in accordance with the Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance recommendations, as described in detail previously7 (link). Briefly, short axis images were contoured at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) using cvi42 post-processing software (Version 5.1.1, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Canada), by eight readers in two core laboratories. The ED frame was selected as the first frame after detection of the R wave, and the ES frame was selected as the smallest LV blood pool area in the mid-ventricular slice. At both ED and ES, the most basal slice included had at least 50% of the LV blood pool surrounded by myocardium. Papillary muscles were included in the blood pool. Left atrial contours delineated on the two chamber and four chamber long axis slices, and right ventricular contours on the short axis slices, were also used in this study to delineate the extent of the LV and the location of the interventricular septum. Interobserver agreement in mass and volume estimates was excellent, with intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.88 and above7 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cardiac MRI Manual Segmentation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The manual segmentation was performed by a group of experienced investigators from the National Heart Centre Singapore (NHCS), consisting of CMR consultants, well-trained clinical research fellows and engineers, using a standardized protocol described in detail in a separate publication (14 (link)). Two operators with over five years' experience (LTT and CWLC) then checked the contouring quality to select the studies deemed for further analysis.
Specifically, left ventricle (LV) endocardial and epicardial borders and the right ventricle (RV) endocardial borders were manually traced in SAX slices at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) time frames using the cvi42 post-processing software (version 5.1.1, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada). ED and ES phases were defined, respectively, as the image with the largest and smallest LV blood volume at visual inspection. The manual contours and the corresponding images were saved for later processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Automated Cardiac MRI Analysis Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CMR scans were completed in dedicated UKB imaging centres using 1.5-T scanners (MAGNETOM Aera, Syngo Platform VD13A, Siemens Healthcare) under pre-defined acquisition protocols [19 ]. Standard long-axis images and a short-axis stack covering both ventricles from base to apex were captured using balanced steady-state free precession sequence [19 ]. CMR examinations of the first 5065 UKB participants were assessed manually using CVI42 post-processing software (version 5.1.1, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc.) [20 (link)]. This analysis set was used to develop a fully automated quality-controlled pipeline and extract the contours for the 32,121 CMR studies [21 (link), 22 (link)].
The following conventional CMR indices were considered during our analysis: LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV), RV end-systolic volume (RVESV), LV stroke volume (LVSV), RV stroke volume (RVSV), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), RV ejection fraction (RVEF), LV mass (LVM). For ease of interpretation, we gave LV and RV ventricular volumes and masses in body surface area standardised format.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

UK Biobank Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The UK Biobank CMR imaging protocol and image analysis have been described in detail previously.18 (link),19 (link) Briefly, CMR examinations were performed with a 1.5 Tesla scanner (MAGNETOM Aera, Syngo Platform VD13A; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) in a single dedicated center for UK Biobank imaging in Cheadle, United Kingdom. The manual analyses of CMR images were previously performed using cvi42 postprocessing software (Version 5.1.1, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Inc, Calgary, Canada) between 8 readers located in 2 core laboratories based on standard operating procedures for analysis. The end-diastolic frame was nominally defined as the first frame of the image series. Papillary muscles were included as blood pool and excluded from mass. The derived left ventricular (LV) parameters included: end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, stroke volume, mass and ejection fraction. A healthy subcohort was previously used to derive normal reference ranges19 (link) and provided cutoffs for our study whereby individuals with LV parameter values outside their sex-specific reference ranges were removed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cardiac MRI Strain Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Manual post-processing analyses were performed using cvi42 post-processing software (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada). LV and RV endocardial and LV epicardial contours were drawn at end-diastolic and end-systolic phases in short axis cine images. LV mass was determined at end diastolic phase, papillary muscles were excluded from LV mass. The cvi42 tissue tracking plugin in beta release 5.3.0.821 was used to determine LV myocardial strain measures. LV endo- and epicardial contours at end diastolic phase in short axis cine images were used to determine peak GRS and peak GCS. To determine peak GLS, LV endo- and epicardial contours were drawn at end-diastolic phase in long axis cine images (2CV, 3CV, 4CV). All post processing analyses were performed by one experienced observer, blinded to study group, according to contemporary consensus recommendations24 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol in UK Biobank

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We selected 500 random UKB participants with record of an imaging center visit using the random number generator package in R. We excluded participants with missing (n = 45) or inadequate quality (n = 23) CMR images. PAT contours were manually drawn for the remaining 432 participants. For the purposes of model training and evaluation, the sample was randomly split into training (n = 345) and test (n = 87) sets. Image analysis was performed blind to participant details using CVI42® post-processing software (Version 5.11, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Canada). Contours were drawn by AB and cross-checked by ZRE.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!