The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using dfc320

1

Microscopic Analysis of Plant Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Epidermal peels and handmade transversal sections of each sample were obtained using a razor blade and dissecting forceps. Samples were then mounted in distillate water and observed under a Leica D.M. 2000 microscope equipped with a digital camera (DFC 320, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Samples of MPF and MPL were also formalin-fixed overnight at room temperature (RT), then processed with an automated Leica ESP 6025 processor and paraffin-embedded. Subsequently, the paraffin blocks were sectioned with a rotative microtome (Leica RM2265), obtaining sections with a thickness of 3–4 μm. Semithin sections were stained with Toluidine Blue O (TBO) as metachromatic staining for both polyphenols and polysaccharides detection [73 (link)], and with hematoxylin–eosin for general staining. Polarized light was used to detect crystals and starch grains [74 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microscopic Analysis of Citrus Fruit Glands

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Little portions of peel were removed from mature fruits along the maximum diameter, and then transversal sections of these portions were made by a razor blade, mounted in distillate water and observed under a transmission-light microscope (Leica D.M., 2000) equipped with a camera (DFC 320, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Morphometric analyses were carried out for each species, by selecting 30–40 mature glands with a large central cavity, according to the gland development stages reported for C. sinensis [30 (link)]. The gland polar (PD) and equatorial (ED) diameters were measured by the Leica QWin, IM50 Image Manager Software. The gland cavity volume (V) was calculated by the formula: V = π × ED × 2 × PD/6, assuming a spheroid shape of cavities [31 (link)].
Samples for SEM analyses were obtained from pieces of about 1 cm2 excised from the mature fruit as above. They were fixed overnight with FineFIX solution (Milestone s.r.l., Bergamo, Italy) in 70% ethanol at 4 °C [45 (link)] and dehydrated through ethanol series: 80%, 90%, 95% and 100%, and critical point dried in CO2 (K850 CPD, 2M Strumenti S.r.l., Roma, Italy). After that, they were mounted on stubs, coated with 10 nm gold, and observed under SEM at 20 kV accelerating voltage (Vega3 LMU, Tescan Inc., Cranberry Twp, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Flower Microscopy and Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flower portions were observed by a Leica M205C stereomicroscope, coupled with EC3 camera and LAS EZ V1.6.0 image analysis software. Epidermal peels of the fresh flowers were mounted on glass slides and observed by a Leica DM 2000 transmission-light microscope coupled with a computer- driven DFC 320 camera (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
For Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) analyses, small flower pieces were fixed in Finefix working solution (Milestone s.r.l., Bergamo, Italy) with 70% ethanol, incubated overnight at 4 °C, dehydrated by ethanol series (70–100%) at 60 min intervals, and dried using a Critical Point Dryer Processor (K850CPD 2M Strumenti S.r.l., Roma, Italy) [28 (link)]. Dried samples were positioned on aluminum stubs, covered with 10nm gold particles, and observed in a VEGA3-Tescan-type LMU microscope (Tescan Orsay Holding, a.s., Brno, Czech Republic), at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Visualization of Atg9A Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed using the free-floating method as previously described [24 (link), 25 (link)]. Briefly, the goat anti-Atg9A polyclonal antibody (sc-70141, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) was used as the primary antibody. This antibody was affinity-purified and raised against a peptide that mapped near the amino terminus of the human Atg9A protein. Sections were visualized according to the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method, using an ABC kit (Vectastain, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and developed for peroxidase reactivity using 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). To observe the stained cells, a microscope (Leica DM4500B, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) with a computer-driven digital camera (DFC320, Leica Microsystems) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Adipogenic Differentiation of MSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to make lipid droplets visible within the cells’ cytoplasm after incubation of MSCs in adipogenic differentiation media, Oil Red O staining was used. After 21 days of differentiation the cells incubated on glass plates (duplicates) were fixed with 4% PFA in PBS and washed three times. Then they were incubated with Oil Red O staining solution and counterstained with hematoxylin. Micrographs were taken using the light microscope Axiophot (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging GmbH, Goettingen,Germany) provided with a digital camera (Leica microsystems, Ltd type DFC320, Bensheim, Germany). 5 overviews per glass plate were taken with 2.5 fold magnification for cell counting of Oil Red O positive cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Aortic Root Lesion Analysis in LDLR-Deficient Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The aortic roots of ldlr−/− mice fed a high fat, high cholesterol diet for 24 weeks were dissected and embedded in Tissue Tek OCTTM (Sakura Finetek, Staufen, Germany). Within the aortic root, serial cryostat sections (6 μm, CM3050S, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) at the level of all 3 cusps were prepared. Lesion areas were analyzed for LCN2, endothelial cells (CD31), alpha smooth muscle cells (αSMA), monocytes/macrophages (MOMA-2) as well as the M1 macrophage marker inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and counterstained with hematoxylin (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) for immunohistochemistry or 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Life Technologies) for immunofluorescence, respectively. Visualization was performed with the appropriate VECTASTAIN ABC reagents for biotinylated antibodies and either ImmPACT DAB or VIP Peroxidase (HRP) Substrate (all from Vector Laboratories) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For immunofluorescence Alexa Fluor 488 and 555 conjugated secondary antibodies were used (Life Technologies). Staining for collagen (Picrosirius Red) were assessed under polarized light. Pictures were captured using a DM4000 B microscope with a DFC320 camera for immunohistochemistry and a DFC350FX camera for immunofluorescence and QWin software (all Leica Microsystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Immunotherapies' Cytotoxic Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, we tested the cytotoxic effects of Ipilimumab or Nivolumab on co-cultures of cancer cells (or HFC cells) with human lymphocytes. Cells were plated in 96-well flat-bottom plates at 10,000 cells/well for 16 h. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMCs) were added at the effector:target ratio 5:1 in the absence or presence of Ipilimumab or Nivolumab (200 nM), and incubated for one day under standard growth condition [17 (link)]. This dose was chosen on the basis of previous cellular experiments performed to test the antitumor and cardiotoxic effects of Ipilimumab or Nivolumab [15 (link),16 (link),17 (link),18 (link)] and was lower than those reached in the patient serum/plasma administered with the conventional therapeutic doses of 10 mg/Kg. Controls included cancer cells or cardiomyocytes incubated in the absence of effector cells or in the presence of the antibodies, used alone. After the incubation with antibodies, hPBMCs were removed and adherent cancer cells or cardiomyocytes were washed twice and counted by trypan blue. Cell survival was expressed as percent of viable cells tested with Nivolumab or Ipilimumab compared to untreated cells (negative control). Cells were also imaged through a Leica Microsystems integrated microscope (DFC320).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Adipocyte Diameter Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 500 mg of each fresh biopsy was digested with collagenase [23 (link)], and the mean adipocyte diameter was determined by computerized image analysis [24 (link)] with Leica software (Leica QWin V3; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The cell suspension was placed between a siliconized glass slide and a cover slip and transferred to the microscope (X5 objective, DM6000B, Leica Microsystems). Twelve random visual fields were photographed with a CCD-camera (DFC320, Leica Microsystems). Uniform microspheres, 98 μm in diameter (Dynal, Invitrogen Corporation, Oslo, Norway), served as reference. Mean adipocyte volume was calculated with the Goldrick formula [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Histological Analysis of Carotid Arteries

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histological analysis and immunohistochemistry staining were performed as previously described [38 (link)]. OCT-embedded common carotid arteries were cut systematically in serial 5-μm cross sections using a cryotome (Leica CM3050S, Leica Microsystems, Germany). Analysis was carried out in the injured left common carotid artery, whereas the contralateral served as a control. For morphometric analysis, sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). For immunofluorescence analysis, sections were stained with a rabbit anti-rat CD31 antibody (1:250, Abcam, USA) and visualized using an Alexa Fluor 647 mouse-anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:500, eBioscience). For immunohistochemistry analysis, sections were stained with a rabbit anti-rat CD31 antibody (1:150, Abcam, USA) and visualized using a mouse-anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:500, Sigma). Negative controls using IgG controls matching in species and concentration were run in parallel. Pictures were taken with a microscope (Leica CM3050S, Leica Microsystems, Germany) and a digital camera (DFC 320, Leica Microsystems) at ×100 magnification. Morphometric analysis was performed per sample followed by computer-assisted morphometric analysis (ImageJ, NIH, USA). Subsequent morphometric analyses were performed in a double-blinded manner. Four animals per group and 3 samples per animal were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Adipocyte Size Quantification Method

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each adipose tissue sample was digested with collagenase (Type A; Roche, Mannheim, Germany), an adipocyte suspension was prepared, and adipocyte size was determined by computerized image analysis22 (link), 23 (link) (Leica QWin V3; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Twelve random visual fields were photographed (DFC320, Leica Microsystems). Microspheres 98 μm in diameter (Dynal, Invitrogen, Oslo, Norway) served as reference. Adipocytes were classified very small (<50 μm diameter), small (50–100 μm), large (100–150 μm) and very large (>150 μm). The formulas for the cross-sectional area (πd2/4) and the volume (πd3/6) of a sphere were used in calculations of individual adipocyte size and weight (density 0.9 g ml–1). In calculations of immune cell density (per 103 adipocytes) and adipocyte glycerol release (per 104 adipocytes), the sample adipocyte size/weight distribution was used. Mean adipocyte volume was determined as the average of all adipocyte volumes. Body adipocyte number was estimated by using body fat volume and the adipocyte volume distribution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!