The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using k amyl

1

Determination of Rice Flour Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brown rice from Nip, Olr, F2, and F3 progeny plants of Olr and Nip were milled into fine flour by using a flour mill. The fine flour from each of the samples was subsequently used for the determination of the starch, amylose, amylopectin, and protein contents. Starch content, amylose content, and amylopectin contents were determined by using the starch assay kits Megazyme K-TSTA and K-AMYL (Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland) as described by Wei et al. [24 (link)]. The protein content of the samples was determined following the method described by Kang et al. [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Determination of Starch, Amylose, and Soluble Sugars in Rice Endosperm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Harvested paddy seeds were air-dried and stored at room temperature. Embryos and pericarps were removed before the experiment, and the endosperms were ground to a powder using a grinding mill. The starch and amylose contents were measured using starch assay kits following the manufacturer’s instructions (K-TSTA and K-AMYL; Megazyme). To determine the amylose content, the powder was soaked for 48 h in 0.4% NaOH (powder:NaOH = 1:3) at room temperature, washed several times with distilled water until no slimy liquid remained, and drained. To determine the amount of soluble sugars, 50 mg of endosperm powder was washed twice in 80% (v/v) ethanol at 80 °C for 40 min and assayed using anthrone reagent49 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Rice Endosperm Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ratio of amylose to amylopectin and total starch content were determined using an Amylose–amylopectin Assay kit (K-AMYL; Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland) and a Total Starch Assay kit (K-TSTA; Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Rice endosperm hardness was determined by measuring the pressure at the grain breakage point using a universal testing machine (Z 0.5, Zwick Roell, Ulm, Germany) (Kwak et al., 2017 (link)). To measure damaged starch content, 100 ± 10 mg of rice flour from each mutant and its respective wild type was tested using a Starch Damage Assay kit (K-SDAM; Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland). For microscopy analysis of the opaque-endosperm phenotype, rice grains were observed on an LED illuminator. Scanning electron microscopy was carried out as described previously (Ryoo et al., 2007 (link)). Starch samples coated with gold were observed under a Stereoscan Leica Model 440 instrument (Leica Cambridge) at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV. The chain-length distribution of starch extracted from mature endosperm was determined according to a previously described high performance anion exchange chromatography method (Ryoo et al., 2007 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Grain Quality Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Grain length, width, and thickness were measured using a vernier caliper from three randomly chosen, fully filled grains. The 1,000-grain weight was determined by weighing three replicates of 1000-grain samples independently on an electronic balance.
Endosperm was collected and then ground to a powder using a grinding mill. Finally, these powders are passed through a 50 mesh screen. The starch and amylose contents were measured using starch assay kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (K-TSTA and K-AMYL; Megazyme). The Blue Value (BV) and maximum absorbance (λmax) of amylopectin were measured as described by Fu and Xue (2010) (link). To determine the amount of soluble sugars, 50 mg of endosperm powder was washed twice in 80% (v/v) ethanol at 80°C for 40 min and assayed using anthrone reagent (Wang et al., 2013 (link)). To determine the amount of reducing sugars, 100 mg samples of powdered endosperm were boiled in a small amount of distilled water for 30 min in a 25 ml volumetric flask, cooled to room temperature, diluted to volume with distilled water, and assayed using the DNS colorimetric method (Miller, 1959 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Corn Starch Varieties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Waxy (0% amylose-100% amylopectin, S4126), normal (20% amylose-80% amylopectin, S6425), and high-amylose (70% amylose-30% amylopectin, S6430) corn starch powders were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). The Amylose content of the starch samples was confirmed by an enzymatic rapid assay kit (K-AMYL, Megazyme International, Wicklow, Ireland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Starch-Iodine Absorption Spectrum Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The starch–iodine absorption spectrum was analyzed following the procedures of Man et al. [22 (link)]. Briefly, starch was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide containing 10% 6.0 M urea (95 °C, 1 h). The dissolved amylose and amylopectin were colorized with iodine solution (0.2% I2 and 2% KI) in 50 mL volumetric flask containing 1 mL starch sample, 1 mL iodine solution, and 48 mL H2O. The sample was scanned using a spectrophotometer (BioMate 3S, Thermo Scientific, Chino, CA, USA). The absorbance data at 550 and 620 nm were obtained from the starch–iodine spectrum. The OD620 was used to measure the apparent amylose content (AAC). In order to avoid the effects of amylopectin and lipid on amylose content, the ratio of amylose to both amylose and amylopectin (usually defined as TAC) was determined with the concanavalin A precipitation method using an amylose/amylopectin assay kit (K-AMYL, Megazyme, Bray, Ireland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quinoa Starch Damage and Amylose

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The damaged starch content in quinoa samples was determined following the American Association of Cereal Chemists method (AACC, 2014) by using a Megazyme starch damage Kit (K-SDAM, Megazyme, Ireland) and it is referred at dry matter. Three replicates were made for each sample. Amylose content of the whole grain quinoa flour was determined by the lectin concanavalin A (Con A) method (Gibson, Solah, & McCleary, 1997) (link) using the assay kit K-AMYL of Megazyme, Ireland. In both methods the absorbance was read at 510 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quinoa Starch Damage and Amylose

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The damaged starch content in quinoa samples was determined following the American Association of Cereal Chemists method (AACC, 2014) by using a Megazyme starch damage Kit (K-SDAM, Megazyme, Ireland) and it is referred at dry matter. Three replicates were made for each sample. Amylose content of the whole grain quinoa flour was determined by the lectin concanavalin A (Con A) method (Gibson, Solah, & McCleary, 1997) (link) using the assay kit K-AMYL of Megazyme, Ireland. In both methods the absorbance was read at 510 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Amylose Content Determination in Starch

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amylose content (AC) of native starch was determined according to the method described by Gibson et al. [19 (link)], using an Amylose/Amylopectin assay kit (K-AMYL, Megazyme, Ireland). The procedure was based on the elimination of amylopectin via the specific formation of amylopectin complexes with the lectin concanavalin A. The AC was then measured spectrophotometrically after hydrolysis to glucose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Starch Composition and Damage Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amylose/amylopectin proportion was analyzed with a commercial assay kit (K-AMYL, Megazyme International, Ireland), based on the method of Gibson et al. [23] (link). Resistant starch was measured according to AACC 32-40 [24] with an assay kit (K-RSTARCH, Megazyme International, Ireland) and expressed as g of resistant starch per 100 g of starch. Damaged starch levels were estimated following the American Association of Cereal Chemists method 76-30A. Later, the reducing sugars were measured (method 80-60; AACC). Damaged starch is defined as the grams of starch subject to enzymatic hydrolysis per 100 g of sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!