The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using paraformaldehyde (pfa)

1

Whole-mount Immunogold Labeling for TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-mount primary antibody labeling was performed as described above. After overnight incubation at 4°C with a rabbit pAb anti-laminin antibody (ab11575, Abcam), organoids were washed with PBS-Triton and incubated overnight at 4°C with a goat anti-rabbit IgG labeled with 10 nm gold (ab39601, Abcam) diluted 1:400. Samples were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% (wt/vol) glutaraldehyde (Agar Scientific, UK) in 0.1 M HEPES (H0887, Sigma-Aldrich) pH 7.2, and postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (R1024, Agar Scientific) and 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide (214022, The British Drug House, Laboratory Chemicals Division) in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (R1102, Agar Scientific) pH 7.2 for 1 hr, then with 1% uranyl acetate (R1100A, Agar Scientific) in water for overnight. Samples were dehydrated, embedded with low-viscosity medium-grade resin (T262, TAAB Laboratories Equipment Ltd) and polymerized for 24 hr at 60°C. For transmission electron microscopy, sections were cut with a Reichert Ultracut ultramicrotome and observed with a FEI Tecnai 12 Biotwin microscope at 80 kV accelerating voltage equipped with a Gatan Orius SC1000 CCD camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Oligomycin Biochemical Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oligomycin was purchased from Cayman Chemical; Paraformaldehyde (16%) was obtained from Agar Scientific, and Propidium iodide from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Antimycin, CCCP, TMRM, Iodoacetate, Collagenase and Triton-x were all purchased from Sigma. All chemicals used were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Detecting RNA Foci in Astrocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Astrocytes on glass coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Agar Scientific) for 15 min at room temperature followed by permeabilization in 70% ethanol at 4°C overnight. Cells were then re‐hydrated in 50% formamide (Sigma)/2x SSC (Sigma) for 10 min at room temperature and blocked in hybridization buffer (50% formamide (Sigma), 2×SSC (Sigma), 10% Dextran Sulfate (Millipore), 1 mg/ml Yeast tRNA (Invitrogen) and 1 mg/ml Salmon Sperm DNA (Invitrogen)) for 30 min at 45°C. 50 ng of an Alexa Fluor® 546‐conjugated (GGCCCC)4 probe (IDT) diluted in the hybridization buffer was applied on cells for 2 hours at 45°C in a humidified chamber. After the hybridization, cells were washed twice with 50% formamide/2× SSC for 30 min at 45°C and then once with 2× SSC for 30 min at room temperature. After another three washes with PBS at room temperature, immunofluorescence imaging was performed as described previously.
As controls, cells were treated with either 3 U/ml DNase (Life Technologies) or 100 μg/ml RNase (Sigma) diluted in 2x SSC for 1 hour at 37°C prior to the hybridization step. In addition, an anti‐sense RNA probe against the CCTG repeat expansion was also applied on cells to assess the specificity of the (GGCCCC)4 probe.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microscopic Characterization of Cell Actin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 96 h of culture, some samples were immersed in Rembaum solution [66 (link)] for 1 h then rinsed three times with demineralized water. They were observed using SEM (Philips XL30 ESEM-FEG, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; quanta FEG 250, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA; Hitachi S-3400N, Tokyo, Japan) after gold coating.
Others were stained to observe the alignment of the actin filaments using fluorescence microscopy. Briefly, samples were fixed in paraformaldehyde (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK), immersed for 45 min in a rhodamine/phalloidin solution (5 units/mL, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) then rinsed with PBS. The nuclei of the cells were also stained with DAPI (1 g/L, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Samples were then observed (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) with excitation and emission wavelengths of 540/565 nm (rhodamine/phalloidin) and 358/461 nm (DAPI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transmission Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A final concentration of 2.5% glutaraldehyde (TAAB) was added to the culture suspension. Cells were pelleted and resuspended in a primary fixative containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 2% paraformaldehyde (Agar Scientific), and 0.1% tannic acid (TAAB) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were fixed for 2 h at room temperature. Pellets were washed with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (Agar Scientific) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) for 1 h at room temperature. Samples were rinsed and stained en bloc for 40 min in 2% aqueous uranyl acetate (TAAB), dehydrated in an ascending acetone series (Fisher Scientific), and embedded in hard formulation Agar 100 resin (Agar Scientific). 70-nm thin sections were made and stained using lead citrate for 5 min, followed by three washes with MilliQ water. Images were captured using a Hitachi H-7650 transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Zebrafish Tissue Preparation for TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue was processed for electron microscopy as previously described (Czopka and Lyons, 2011 (link)). Briefly, 4 dpf larvae were anaesthetised with tricaine and chemically fixed with microwave stimulation using a solution of 2% glutaraldehyde, 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Agar Scientific, Essex, UK). Embryos subsequently underwent secondary fixation with microwave stimulation in 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate/imidazole (Agar Scientific) followed by en bloc stain in saturated uranyl acetate (~8%, w/v, in water) (TAAB Laboratories Equipment Ltd., Berkshire, UK). Samples were then progressively dehydrated in a series of ethanol and acetone washes before being embedded in Embed-812 resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). Ultra-thin sections (70 nm thickness) were cut around somite 15 using a Reichert Jung Ultracut microtome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and stained using uranyl acetate (TAAB Laboratories Equipment Ltd.) and Sato lead stain (see (Czopka and Lyons, 2011 (link)) for detailed protocol). Stained sections were imaged using a Jeol JEM-1400 Plus transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA, Inc., Peabody, MA) at 8600x magnification. Individual tiles were automatically aligned using the PhotoMerge tool in Adobe Photoshop CC (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA) and quantified manually using Fiji (ImageJ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mouse Eyes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse eyes were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde (Agar Scientific Ltd. Cambridge, UK) for 2 hr. After paraffin embedding the eyeballs were cut into 5 μm thick sections and mounted on charged glass slides. Slides were de‐paraffinized and subjected to citrate‐based antigen retrieval. Paraffin sections were retreated with DAKO high pH antigen retrieval system (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) using a domestic 600 kW microwave oven. Nonspecific antibody binding was blocked by incubating sections in 4% BSA, followed by 10% nonimmune goat serum (Zymed Corp., San Francisco, CA). Primary antibody was applied at a 1:200 to 400 dilutions overnight at room temperature. Sections then were incubated with secondary antibody for 30 min. The localization of target proteins was demonstrated with pre‐diluted streptavidin‐horseradish peroxidase (Zymed, UK) and 0.05% 3, 3‐diaminobenzidine in TBS, with H2O2 as the substrate. All sections were counterstained lightly with hematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterizing Autophagosomes in Murine Cartilage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microdissected cartilage from mice was fixed using 2.5% glutaraldehyde + 4% paraformaldehyde (stocks solutions both from Agar Scientific) in 0.1 M 1,4 Piperazine bis (2-ethanosulfonic acid) (Sigma-Aldrich) buffer at pH 7.2 at room temperature for 1–2 h, then at 4 °C until further processing. Samples were prepared as described previously [10] and imaged on an FEI company Tecnai 12 TEM with a Gatan US1000 camera. Thereafter, autophagosomes from images were counted from cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Inhibitor Incubation on Coverslip Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coverslips were removed from the Maximow slide assemblies, placed in 35-mm diameter plastic Petri dishes, washed once with HBHBSS, and incubated with control medium or medium containing the inhibitor to be tested. Inhibitors were obtained or prepared as stock concentrates (usually at a concentration 100–1,000× greater than that required) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or H2O. An equivalent volume of DMSO or H2O was added to the control medium. After 5–48 hours incubation at 37°C, cultures were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Agar Scientific, Essex, UK) in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, for 1 hour at room temperature, and then rinsed three times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Testis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Testes were dissected in 1X PBS, fixed for 30 min to 1 h in 4% paraformaldehyde (Agar Scientific, UK)/1X PBS, washed in PBS/0.1% TX-100 for at least 1 h and incubated overnight in Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Labs) before mounting.
For phalloidin staining to visualise actin cones, testes were dissected, fixed and washed as above then incubated with TRITC-phalloidin for 45 min at room temperature. Samples were extensively washed in 1X PBS/0.3% TX-100 before addition of the mountant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!