The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using e cadherin

1

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC was performed on 5 μm sections using an automated immunostainer (Ventana BenchMark ULTRA, Ventana Medical Systems, Oro Valley, AZ, USA) and protein expression was quantified using the histoscore method as previously described51 (link). The following antibodies were used: AXL (Cell Signaling Technology, Leiden, The Netherlands, #8661, dilution 1:100), pAkt (Cell Signaling Technology, #4060, dilution 1:50), phospho-PRAS40 (Cell Signaling Technology, #2997, dilution 1:100), E-cadherin (Roche #5973872001, RTU), β-catenin (Roche #5269016001, RTU), vimentin (Roche #5278139001, RTU), and N-cadherin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, #ab18203, dilution 1:100).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Immunohistochemical and FISH Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC staining was performed using the Ventana Bench Mark ultra autostainer and the Ventana Ultra View universal DAB detection kit (Ventana Medical System Inc., Roche Tucson, Arizona, USA). The primary antibodies including ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, E-cadherin, p120, AE1/AE3, calponin and p63 were purchased from Roche Ventana. All IHC stains were carried out with appropriate positive and negative controls.
The status of ER and PR were determined following ASCO/CAP guideline [10 (link)]. The ratio of nuclei-positive tumor cells to all tumor cells represented Ki-67 expression level and a Ki-67 expression was high when the ratio was ≥20% [9 (link)]. E-cadherin and p120 were employed to discriminate lobular carcinomas from ductal carcinomas. Double immunostainings were performed with AE1/AE3/P63 or AE1/AE3/calponin to confirm the presence of an invasive component.
A dual-probe FISH test using the PathVysion HER2 DNA probe Kit (Vysis Inc., Downers Grove, IL) was performed on the same specimen as IHC test following the manufacturer’s instructions. FISH results were interpreted by two experienced pathologists independently.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analyses, paraffin blocks were obtained, cut, and stained by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) in order to select the best histological area. Subsequently, selected tissue areas were placed into the TMA by circling the identified area in the corresponding block. Cylindrical core biopsies were then extracted from each paraffin block using a 20-μm2 stylet and placed into a new recipient block. Selected adequate cases had tumors that occupied at least 10% of the core area. Each case was processed in triplicate to prevent tissue loss during cutting. Sections from each tissue array block were cut, de-paraffinized, and dehydrated for H&E and immunohistochemical procedures. Our IHC analyses included the following primary antibodies: PD-L1: Cat # SK00521-k (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA); all other antibodies: E-cadherin: Cat # 7904497 MLH1: Cat # 06472966001; PMS2: Cat # 06419216001; MSH2: Cat # 05269270001; MSH6: Cat # 5929911001); HER2: Cat # 05278368001; p16: Cat # 06695221001; p53: Cat # 5278074001 were from Roche Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). Protein expression levels were determined in a manually prepared TMA [38 (link),39 (link)] from deparaffinized sections obtained from archival tumor samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Vulvar Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the immunohistochemical analyses were performed on the final surgical specimens (wide vulvar resection or skinning vulvectomy/hemivulvectomy). For all patients, both previous pathologic reports and slides were independently reviewed by two pathologists (VC, LA). 2.5-μm sections were cut from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue of each patient and immunohistochemical analysis was performed in an automated system (Benchmark-Ultra, Ventana, Tucson, AZ, US). The following primary antibodies were used: CD34 (monoclonal antibody, clone QBEND/10; 1:400 dilution; Neomarkers, Freemont, CA, USA), CD31 (monoclonal antibody, clone JC70, Prediluted, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, US), E-cadherin (monoclonal antibody, clone 36, pre-diluted, Ventana, Tucson, AZ, US), N –cadherin (monoclonal antibody, clone 6G11, dilution 1:50, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark); SLUG (monoclonal antibody, 1A6, dilution 1:100, Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA), β-catenin (monoclonal antibody, clone 14, ready to use, Cell Marque).
Normal vulvar skin was used as positive control while for negative controls, the primary antibodies were replaced by PBS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemistry Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections were pretreated in CC1-buffer (Cell Conditioner 1; Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) at 95°C for 36 min (E-cadherin, β-catenin), at 95°C for 64 min (CK19) and at 100°C for 36 min (CK5). Slides were then incubated with primary antibodies diluted in Ventana antibody diluent for 32 min at 36°C and detected using Ultra View Universal DAB Detection kit using a Bench Mark Ultra (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.). For slides stained with CK5 an extra step adding an Opti View HQ Linker (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.) was added before detection. Slides were counterstained with Hematoxylin and Bluing Reagent (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.). The antibody against E-cadherin (M3612, DAKO; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) was diluted 1:25, anti-β-catenin (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) 1:1,500, anti-CK-5 (Novocastra; Leica Microsystems, Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) 1:100 and anti-CK-19 (M0888, DAKO; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) 1:50.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Lung Adenocarcinoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surgical specimens were collected by the Tissue Retrieval Services, and a tissue array comprising 50 lung ADC and 6 normal adjacent tissue (NAT) samples were prepared as 1 mm diameter cores in duplicate on two slides, totaling 4 cores per tissue, by the Histopathology and Imaging Shared Resource, at Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey. Tumor/tissue quality was monitored under the guidance of a clinical pathologist. Immunohistochemical staining was done by permeabilizing with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 minutes, quenching endogenous peroxides with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 minutes, followed by blocking, as well as primary and secondary antibody incubation. Immunoreactivity was visualized with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Sigma). The primary antibodies used were: Sox9 (1:50, HPA001758, Sigma), E-cadherin (pre-diluted, 760-4440, Ventana), Notch1 (1:100, EP1238Y, Epitomics).
Samples for which at least 25% of the tumor cells stained positive were considered positive. Staining intensity was scored as 0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, strong. Scoring was performed in a blinded manner by two clinical pathologists and discordant results were discussed until a consensus was reached.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded prostatic tissue of lymph node metastasized PCa (N = 95) and castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) (N = 28) were provided from cohorts of the University Hospital of Luebeck. Our study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Luebeck (17-313). These tissues and xenograft tumors were used to prepare tissue microarrays (TMA), as previously described in Shaikhibrahim et al. [10 (link)]. The following primary antibodies, KDM5C (34718, dilution 1:1000/1:2000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), E-Cadherin (36, Ventana Medical System, Tucson, AZ, USA), Ki-67 monoclonal rabbit (30-9, Ventana Medical System), were used and detected with Ultra View Universal DAB Detection Kit (Ventana Medical System). Slides were then digitized using the Zeiss Panoramic Midi Scanner (3DHistech, Budapest, Hungary). The images of KI-67 staining were analyzed semi-quantitatively with the software Definiens Tissue Studio 2.1 (Tissue Studio v.2, Definiens AG, Munich, Germany) as previously described in Stein et al. [6 (link)]. KDM5C and CDH were analyzed through eyeball analyses, the definition of nuclear KDM5C and membranous CDH1 as negative or positive by two experienced observers. Samples with absence of carcinoma or lack of tissue were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polyclonal antibody against phosphorylated (Tyr-705) STAT3 (P-STAT3), total STAT3 (T-STAT3), phosphorylated (Tyr-1007/1008) JAK2 (P-JAK2), and total JAK2 (T-JAK2) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Antibodies against cytokeratin 7 (cyt7), Ki67, CA125, E-cadherin, vimentin, CD34, Oct4, and CD117 (c-Kit) used for immunohistochemistry were obtained from Ventana (Roche, AZ, USA). CYT387 [Momelotinib (GS-0387/CYT-0387)] was obtained from Gilead Sciences (CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Protein Expression in Tissue Microarrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue microarray blocks of 1 mm were cut from FFPE blocks and sliced into 3 µm slides, automatically stained, and evaluated as previously described [13 (link)]. In short, the slides were deparaffinized and incubated with primary antibodies E-cadherin, Vimentin (monoclonal, ready-to-use; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA), ZEB1, and ZEB2 (polyclonal, 1:400; Sigma-Aldrich). Counterstaining was performed with Hematoxylin II and Blueing Reagent. Next, samples were covered with a series of alcohol (70–99%), Xylol and Cytoseal XYL (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as a cover medium. Quantification of immunohistochemical staining was performed using ImageJ 1.52 (ImageJ Software, National Institutes of Health, Madison, WI, USA). Images of tissue microarrays were taken at 20× magnification with a predefined number of 1,228,800 square pixels. The Color-Threshold function was subsequently used to mark all areas previously stained by immunohistochemistry. The degree of protein expression in tissue microarrays was stated as the mean percentage of square pixels marked by ImageJ for respective images of every protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Staining of FFPE Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining of 3 µm thick macrodissected and tissue-arrayed formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue sections was performed automatically using the Benchmark Ultra (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Oro Valley, AZ, USA). This staining machine contains peroxidase, inhibitors, buffer solutions, dye and the secondary antibody (OptiView HQ Universal Linker, Ventana Medical Systems). E-cadherin, vimentin (each monoclonal, ready-to-use, Ventana Medical Systems), fibronectin (polyclonal, 1:1000, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and ZEB-1 (polyclonal, 1:400, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used as primary antibodies. Negative controls without primary antibodies and positive controls (pancreas, tonsil, colon and kidney) were included in all experiments using the same experimental conditions. The slides were counterstained with Haematoxylin and dehydrated in graded alcohols. Immunohistochemical staining was evaluated separately in stromal and epithelial tissue by two pathologists in a blinded manner using light microscopy (BX51, Olympus) [89 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!