The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6400 calorimeter

Manufactured by Parr
Sourced in United States

The Parr 6400 Calorimeter is a precision instrument designed to measure the heat of combustion or other reactions. It features an adiabatic bomb calorimeter system that allows for accurate and reproducible measurements of the energy content of various materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using 6400 calorimeter

1

Feed Composition and Quality Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Feed samples were dried at 65°C in a forced air oven for 72 h, and ground through a 1-mm sieve (JFSO-100, Topu Yunnong Instrument, Hangzhou, China). The DM (method 925.45), organic matter (method 942.05), and ether extract (method 920.29) were determined according to the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, AOAC, 2006 ). Total nitrogen content was determined using a nitrogen analyzer (K1000, Hannon Instruments, Jinan, China), and CP was calculated as total N × 6.25. Neutral detergent fiber (aNDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were determined by an automatic fiber analyzer (Ankom Technology, Fairport, NY, United States) according to Robertson and Van Soest (1981) and Van Soest et al. (1991) (link), respectively. Ten g of sodium sulfate per aNDF solution and 0.5 g heat-stable α-amylase per sample were added to the aNDF solution. The ADF was determined on the residue of the aNDF. Gross energy of feed was determined by bomb calorimetry (6400 Calorimeter, Parr Instrument Company, Moline, Illinois, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fecal Energy Content and Assimilation Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fecal samples were collected from individual mice over 5 days and dried at 55 °C for another 5 days. Dried fecal pellets were grinded using the TissueLyserII (Qiagen, Retsch, Haan, Germany) and pressed into pellets of 1 g (technical duplicates). Gross fecal energy content was measured using a 6400 calorimeter (Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL, USA). Assimilation efficiency was calculated by recording the food intake and feces production over the fecal collection days as indicated in the formula below. Assimilationefficiency(%)=(Foodintake[g]Efood[kJg1])(Fecesproduction[g]Efeces[kJg1])Foodintake[g]Efood[kJg1]x100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nutritional Analysis of Wheat Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All wheat samples were ground through a 1 mm screen for further chemical analysis. The moisture, ash, crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF) and EE were analyzed according to the standard procedures of AOAC (2000). The CP was determined using a kjeldahl apparatus (BUCHI K-360, SW). The contents of CF, ADF and NDF were measured according to the methods of Van Soest and Wine [7 (link)] with fiber analysis equipment (FibertecTM 2010, DEN). The gross energies (GE) of wheat samples, excreta, diets and meat samples were determined using the automatic adiabatic oxygen bomb calorimeter (Parr 6400 calorimeter, Moline, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analytical Methods for Animal Nutrition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of the animal experiment, fecal samples were dried at 60°C in a forced-air oven for 72 h, and then were finely ground. Diets and feces were analyzed for dry matter (DM) (AOAC, 2000 ), ether extract (EE) (Thiex et al., 2003 (link)) and ash (AOAC, 2000 ). Kjeldahl N was determined according to the method of Thiex et al. (2002) (link). Diet and fecal samples were analyzed for neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) by using filter bags and Fiber Analyzer equipment (Fiber Analyzer, Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY, USA) following a modification of the procedure of Van Soest et al. (1991) . Starch was determined after converting starch to glucose using an enzyme assay kit (Megazym International Ireland, Wicklow, Ireland). The gross energy (GE) of urine was measured by applying 4 mL of urine sample onto 2 filter papers in a special crucible manufactured by Parr Instrument Company and then dried for 8 h in a 65°C drying oven. The GE of feces and diets were measured using an isoperibol oxygen bomb calorimeter (Parr 6400 Calorimeter, Moline, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nutrient Utilization Determination Using AIA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Apparent utilization of nutrients was measured using acid-insoluble ash (AIA) as a marker (Young, 1977 ). Feed and excreta samples were dried at 65 °C for 48 h in a forced-air oven, then ground and passed through a 1-mm sieve and subjected to chemical analyses. Samples were analyzed for dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and ether extract (EE) according to the AOAC International guidelines (Horwitz, 2010 ). The energy was determined using an adiabatic oxygen bomb calorimeter (Parr 6400 calorimeter, Moline, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Feed Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dried samples were ground through a 2-mm screen. Organic matter was determined by combusting samples at 500-600 C for 2 h (AOAC method 942.05), total N was analysed using the Kjeldahl technique (AOAC method 976.06), and crude fibre was determined by the ceramic fibre filter method (AOAC method 962.09) (AOAC 2012). Gross energy was measured in a 6400 calorimeter (Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer's operating instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Nutrient Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All food and feces labeled with brilliant green dye (used in the intervention) were collected, mixed well, and lyophilized. 24-hour urine from the intervention day was collected and underwent direct lyophilization. Lyophilization was performed at -50°C using an instrument (SJIA-5FE, ShuangJia Instrument, Ningbo, China). Calories were measured by using bomb calorimetry according to the published protocol (29 (link)) (Parr 6400 Calorimeter, PARR Instrument Co., Moline, IL). To minimize the error of measurements, all samples were measured repeatedly. If the difference between repeated samples > 50 Cal, measurements were repeated until the difference < 50 cal. We averaged two qualified measurements as the final calories of each sample. Food and fecal protein concentration were determined by the Kjeldahl method, fat concentration was determined by the Soxhlet method, and carbohydrates concentration was calculated by subtracting the protein, fat, water, and ash from the total weight of the sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nutrient Analysis of Diets and Feces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diets or feces were ground to pass through a 0.42-mm sieve and thoroughly mixed before analysis. Diets and feces were analyzed for DM (method 930.15; AOAC [24 ]), CP (method 984.13; AOAC [24 ]), ether extract (EE; method 920.39; AOAC [24 ]), neutral (NDF) [25 (link)] and acid detergent fiber (ADF; method 973.18; AOAC [24 ]). GE of diets, feces or in vitro undigestible residue was measured using an automatic isoperibol oxygen bomb calorimeter (Parr 6400 Calorimeter; Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Coal and Steel Slag

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A low-rank coal sample was collected from Pingshuo power generation plant in Shanxi Province, China. Proximate analysis and ultimate analysis of the coal sample were performed using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA-701, LECO) and an elemental analyzer (vario Macro CHNS, Elementar), respectively, and the calorific value was determined by an adiabatic bomb calorimetry (Parr 6400 Calorimeter, Parr). The results obtained are summarized in Table 2. Additionally, the chemical compositions of the coal ash were determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer (S4-Explorer, Bruker) and the results are detailed in Table 2. The coal sample was first dried for 24h at 105 oC and then crushed and ground to a size smaller than 150 um.
Industrial steel slags were acquired from Shougang Corporation in Beijing, China, the chemical compositions of which were measured by XRF (S4-Explorer, Bruker) and displayed in Table 2. The slag was first crushed into small particles after drying, and then thoroughly mixed with the coal powder using a ball grinder for the subsequent gasification. Three samples were prepared using the foregoing materials, i.e., a raw steel slag sample (S0), a raw coal sample (S1) and a mixture with the mass ratio of coal sample to steel slags of 1:1 (S2), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fecal Microbiome and Exergy Excretion Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the short-term HFD study, fecal samples from three groups were collected for 24 h following 1 week of HFD feeding. Samples from five mice in each group were combined, and the fecal microbiota composition was analyzed by Illumina sequencing performed by GenomicWorks (GenomicWorks, Daejeon, Korea) as described previously33 (link)–36 (link). Briefly, PCR amplification was performed with extracted DNA using primers targeting the V3–V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. The amplified products were purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and assessed on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA) using a DNA 7500 chip. Sequencing was carried out with an Illumina MiSeq Sequencing System according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA). To measure fecal exergy excretion, feces were collected during the last 48 h, and calorie content in dried feces was analyzed by bomb calorimetry using a Parr 6400 Calorimeter (Parr, Moline, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!