The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using anti s100a9

1

Quantifying S100A9 Expression in Wounded Mouse Corneas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse corneas were excised at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-wounding and immediately flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Corneas were thawed in 200 µl of buffer containing 20-mM Tris-HCl, 150-mM sodium chloride, 1-mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 0.05% Tween 20, and a 1X Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Homogenates were created by disrupting the corneas for 10 minutes at maximum speed in a Bullet Blender (Next Advance, Inc., Averill Park, NY, USA) using 0.9- to 2-mm stainless steel beads. Homogenates were centrifuged at 16,000g for 10 minutes to eliminate the froth. Protein concentrations of lysates were determined. Equal amounts of protein (20 µg) from each sample of corneal homogenate were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Whatman, Inc., Florham Park, NJ, USA) for western blot analysis. Blots were treated as described previously to quantify S100A9 and β-actin. The mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin primary antibody was from MilliporeSigma (Burlington, MA, USA) and the rabbit polyclonal anti-S100A9 was from Abcam. Blots were analyzed and semiquantified using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Molecular Mechanisms in Inflammatory Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies included anti-S100A9 (Cat no. ab92507; Abcam), anti-TLR4 (Cat no. sc-293072; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-RAGE (Cat no. sc-80653; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-p38 (Cat no. 9212; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p65 (Cat no. 3034; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-ERK1/2 (Cat no. 4695; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-JNK (Cat no. 9253; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-AKT (Cat no. 8596; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-phospho(p)-p38 (Cat no. 4511; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p-p65 (Cat no. 3033; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p-ERK1/2 (Cat no. 3510; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p-JNK (Cat no. 4668; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p-AKT (Cat no. 9271; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CD8 (Cat no. 340046, BD), anti-HLA-DR (Cat no. 4310370, eBioscience), anti-CD33 (Cat no. 4296343, eBioscience) and CD11b (Cat no. 4291932, eBioscience), and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse, anti-rabbit IgG antibodies. The inhibitors contained TAK-242 (MedChemExpress, New Jersey), FPS-ZM1 (MedChemExpress, New Jersey), SB203580 (Beyotime) and BAY 11-7082 (Beyotime). The preparation of the recombination GST-S100A9 protein, as well as its control protein GST, have previously been described (21 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibody panel for cell analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used in this study: anti-CD11b-FITC (Biolegend, 101206, dilution ratio: 1:100 for flow cytometry and immunofluorescence); anti-Ly-6G-PE (eBioscience, 12-9668-82, dilution ratio: 1:100 for flow cytometry); anti-Ly-6C-PE (Cell eBioscience, 12-5932-82, dilution ratio: 1:100 for flow cytometry); anti-p-Smad1/5 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9516, dilution ratio: 1:100 for immunofluorescence and 1:1000 for Western blot); anti-Smad1/5 (Cell Signaling Technology, 6,944, dilution ratio: 1:100 for immunofluorescence and 1:1000 for Western blot); anti-p-Stat3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9,145, dilution ratio: 1:1000 for Western blot); anti-Stat3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9,139, dilution ratio: 1:1000 for Western blot); anti-p-Erk (Cell Signaling Technology, 4,370, dilution ratio: 1:1000 for Western blot); anti-Erk (Cell Signaling Technology, 4,695, dilution ratio: 1:1000 for Western blot); anti-mouse IL6 (Biolegend, 504501, dilution ratio: 1:500 for neutralization); anti-S100A9 (Abcam, GB111149, dilution ratio: 1:2000 for IHC); anti-Ki67 (Servicebio, GB13030-2, dilution ratio: 1:500 for IHC), and anti-β-actin (Sigma, A1978, dilution ratio: 1:1000 for Western blot). Rat tail collagen I (Corning, 356236) and RhBMP2 (R&D, 355-BM-100) were also used. Tris–HCl, NaCl, and other chemicals were from Sigma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Renal Immune Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression levels of S100A9,F4/80, ki67 on the renal sections were determined using immunohistochemistry as previously described (Chen et al., 2022 (link)). These expression levels were determined with anti-S100A9 (Abcam, United Kingdom, 1:500), anti-F4/80 antibody (Abcam, United Kingdom, 1:100) or anti-ki67 (Abcam, United Kingdom, 1:300). After the slices were dewaxed, they were incubated with anti-S100A9, anti-F4/80 antibody or anti-ki67 overnight at 4°C. Then, the color reaction was performed using a diaminobenzidine (DAB) coloring kit (Gene Tech, Shanghai, China). All images were randomly selected from 5 visual fields for each slice and photographed with a Nikon microscope (Nikon, Tokyo).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Skin Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 4% formaldehyde-fixed and dehydrated skin tissue samples were embedded in paraffin wax and cut into 5-µm-thick sections. The skin sections were incubated with a primary antibody against human KRT10 (1:100; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), followed by incubation with the adequate secondary antibody. After staining, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin to provide contrast. For immunofluorescence staining, the skin tissues were quench-frozen and embedded in OCT. The cryosections (10 µm) were fixed in chilled acetone for 15 min and incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-S100A9 (1:400; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-HBD-2 (1:400; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-Filaggrin (1:400; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-Involucrin (1:400; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-AO-1 (1:400; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-CLDN-1 (1:400; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-KRT6 (1:400; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-KRT10 (1:400; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and anti-KRT17 (1:400; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) primary antibodies, followed by Alexa Fluor 488- or 568-conjugated secondary antibodies and DAPI. The immunostained images were obtained using a digital camera (DP74; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) coupled with an optical microscope (BX53; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Kidney Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the double immunostaining of kidney tissue, anti-S100A9 (Abcam, United States, 1:1000) and anti-F4/80 (Abacam, 1:400) were used to stain kidney tissue section at 48 h of CLP surgery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histopathological Analysis of Oral Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse oral tissues were harvested at termination of the bioassay, fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin using standard procedures as described above. H&E stained tissue sections were evaluated for inflammation, epithelial hyperplasia, hyperkeratosis, cellular atypia, SCCs, papillomas and other neoplasms by a board-certified veterinary pathologist (Hannah Atkins) blinded to treatment group. Several host and viral protein markers including p120 ctn, p53, S100A9, MmuPV1-L1 and MmuPV1-E4 were tested using standard immunohistochemistry of sequential sections of selected oral tissues [21 (link),22 (link)]. L1 was detected using an in-house mouse monoclonal antibody, MPV. B9 [21 (link)], and E4 was detected using a rabbit polyclonal antiserum to E4 (kind gift from John Doorbar [Cambridge University, UK]). Antibodies to host proteins were obtained from R&D Systems (goat polyclonal anti-p53 Cat #1355-SP: 1:200 dilution) and Abcam (goat polyclonal anti-S100A9, Cat #PAB11470: 1:20 dilution) and used as recommended by the manufacturers. Tissue sections were pre-treated using low-temperature antigen retrieval, citrate buffer (pH6) (Vector Laboratories), and incubated with corresponding primary and secondary antibodies at room temperature followed by colorimetric development as described in our previous studies [23 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Expression Profiling in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed with lysis buffer containing a protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). We used anti-S100A9 (Abcam for humans and R&D for mice), anti-phospho-S100A9 (ThermoFisher Scientific), anti-phospho-ERK (Abcam), anti-ERK (Abcam), anti-phospho-p38 (Abcam), anti-p38 (Abcam), anti-phospho-NF-κB (Abcam), anti-NF-κB (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-phospho‐Smad 3 (Abcam), anti-Smad 3 (Abcam), anti-MPO (Abcam), anti-NE (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-CD68 (Abcam), anti-inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (Abcam), and anti-Arginase 1 (ThermoFisher Scientific) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CD33 and S100A9

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining for CD33 and S100A9 was performed using anti-human CD33 (Cat no. ab92507, eBioscience) and an anti-S100A9 (Cat no. ab92507, Abcam) antibodies following the manufacturer's instructions. Briefy, the deparaffinized and dehydrated sections were boiled for 10 min in 0.01 M citrate buffer and incubated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in methanol for 15 min to block endogenous peroxidase, incubated with primary and peroxidase-tagged secondary antibodies sequentially, and colorized with 0.05% 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (DAB). The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, and observed, and representative images were captured under an inverted phase contrast microscope (Olympus B640, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!