The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

57 protocols using ki 67 mib 1

1

Comprehensive IHC Biomarker Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In our IHC study, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections obtained from surgical specimens were stained using appropriate antibodies specific for 4 markers: ER (1:100 dilution, clone 6F11; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), PR (clone 16; Novocastra), HER2 (4B5 rabbit monoclonal antibody; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, US), and Ki-67 (MIB-1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The HER2 status was defined as positive with a score of 3+ and negative with a score of 0 or 1+. Tumors with scores of 2+ were analyzed by fluorescent in situ hybridization following the manufacturer's protocol (PathVysion kit; Vysis, Downers Grove, US or HER2 inform; Ventana Medical Systems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Lymphoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical stainings were performed on FFPE tissue using fully automated protocols (DAKO Autostainer Link 48). Staining protocols with antibodies to MYC (clone Y69; Abcam), BCL‐2 (clone 124; DAKO), BCL‐6 (clone PG‐B6p; DAKO), Ki‐67 (MIB‐1; DAKO), MUM‐1(clone MUM1p; DAKO), CD10 (clone 56C6; DAKO) and p53 (DO‐7; DAKO) were performed. The estimation of positive staining for CD10, BCL‐6 and MUM‐1 was based on the Hans algorithm. Cut‐off values of 70% and 40% were used for BCL2 and MYC, respectively, as previously described.16
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Profiling of PC2 and Ki67

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All tissues for immunohistochemistry were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. Consecutive (semiserial) 4 μm sections of tissue samples were collected on poly-L-lysine coated slides. One section for each sample was stained with H and E. For immunohistochemical studies, the histologic sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded alcohols up to water. Antigen retrieval was performed by microwaving the slides in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH, 6). Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by treatment with 1% hydrogen peroxide for 20 minutes. Incubation with an appropriate protein-blocking solution was performed. Sections were subsequently incubated with primary antibodies: monoclonal mouse anti-PC2 (clone D-3) antibody (cat. no. sc-28331; dilution 1:100) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and Ki67 (MIB-1) (Dako). Detection was carried out using the Envision Plus Detection System kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (DakoCytomation), with 3,3΄-diaminobenzidine as a chromogen (which yielded brown reaction products). Sections were counterstained with Mayer hematoxylin solution, dehydrated, and mounted. To ensure antibody specificity, negative controls included the omission of primary antibodies and substitution with nonimmune serum. Positive human kidney tissue for PC2 was used as a positive control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Breast Cancer Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously described [17 (link)], we evaluated ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 expression using the following antibodies, ER (1:100 clone 6F11; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), PR (clone 16; Novocastra), HER2 (4B5 rabbit monoclonal antibody; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA), and Ki-67 (MIB-1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). ER- and PR-positive IHC expression was defined according to the modified Allred system: positive, Allred score 3–8 and negative, Allred score 0–2. HER2 status was re-evaluated according to American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline [18 (link)]. HER2 status was considered positive if the score was 3+, and was considered negative with a score of 0 or 1+. Tumors with a score of 2+ underwent FISH or SISH analysis, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (PathVysion kit; Vysis, Downers Grove, IL, USA or HER2 inform; Ventana). Ki-67 expression is presented as the percentage (range 0–100%) of positive tumor cells.
For the molecular subtyping, the following definitions were used: i) Luminal/HER2 negative: ER positive and/or PR positive and HER2 negative; ii) HER2 positive: HER2 positive regardless of ER and PR status; and iii) TNBC: ER negative, PR negative, and HER2 negative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical studies were conducted as previously described [26 (link)]. Antihuman polyclonal rabbit IgG served as a negative control. The antibodies used were Ki67 (MIB-1,DAKO; dilution 1:100), p53 (sc-126, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, dilution 1:200), MDM2 (18–2403, Clone IF2, Invitrogen; dilution 1:25), MDM4 (MDMX Abcam 76362; dilution 1:2000), p14ARF (clone 4C6/4 MAB 3782; Chemicon International; dilution 1:250), AR (sc-816, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, dilution 1:500). The degree of staining was evaluated blindly in a semiquantitative fashion by a pathologist (F.U.M. and A.D.B.) noting both the intensity of staining as well as the percentage of cells exhibiting that intensity in the nucleus and the cytoplasm. The intensity of the staining was scored as no staining (0), weak (1), intermediate (2), and strong (3) staining. The composite score was the number of cells staining multiplied by the intensity of staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Breast Cancer Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In our immunohistochemistry (IHC) study, core needle biopsy samples were stained using appropriate antibodies specific for four markers: ER (1:100 dilution, clone 6F11; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), PR (clone 16; Novocastra, UK), HER2 (4B5 rabbit monoclonal antibody; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA), and Ki-67 (MIB-1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). ER- and PR-positive were defined as a cutoff value of ≥ 1% positively stained nuclei41 (link), or according to the modified Allred system: positive, Allred scores 2–8,and negative, Allred scores 042 (link). The HER2 status was defined as positive with a score of 3+, and negative with a score of 0 or 1+. Tumors with scores of 2+ were sent for fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis according to the protocol given by the supplier (PathVysion kit; Vysis, Downers Grove, IL, USA, or HER2 inform; Ventana)43 (link). Staining positive for the nuclear antigen Ki-67 was evaluated in a quantitatively and visually way using light microscopes, and the positive tumor cell percentage was reported as the Ki-67 labeling index (LI)44 (link). We considered Ki-67 levels ≥ 14% as high45 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Brain Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections as described (29 (link), 31 (link)). Primary antibodies used for IHC were anti-IDH1 R132H (Dianova, 1: 100), Ki-67 (MIB-1, Dako, 1: 150), anti-CD31 (BD Pharmingen, 1: 150) and anti-nestin (Santa Cruz, 1: 400).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 3 μm sections derived from formalinfixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. Samples were immunhistochemically stained by using the Ventana Benchmark system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacterer´s protocol. Antibodies against cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6; 1:50, Dako; Hamburg, Germany), cytokertain 7 (CK7; 1:150, ZytoVision, Bremerhaven, Germany), cytokeratin 14 (CK14; 1:300, DC Systems, Hamburg, Germany), p53 (1:200; Dako, Hamburg, Germany), S100 (1:6000, Dako, Hamburg, Germany), estrogen receptor and progesteron receptor (each 1:20, DC Systems, Hamburg, Germany), Her2/neu (1:300, Dako, Hamburg, Germany), mammaglobin (1:100, Menarini Diagnsotics, Berlin, Germany), muc 4 (1:300, Santa Cruz, Heidelberg, Germany), prostate-specific antigen (PSA; 1:3000, Dako, Hamburg, Germany), androgen receptor (AR; 1:1; CellMarque, Darmstadt, Germany) and Ki67/MIB-1 (1:50, Dako, Hamburg, Germany) were applied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Breast Cancer Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For our IHC study of four markers, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections obtained from surgical specimens were stained with appropriate antibodies specific for the ER (1:100 clone 6F11; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), progesterone receptor (PR; clone 16; Novocastra), and Ki-67 (MIB-1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). ER and PR IHC test results were stratified into four groups using the modified Allred system: strong, Allred score 7–8; moderate, Allred score 5–6; weak, Allred score 2–4; and negative, Allred score 0–1 [14 (link)]. Ki67 expression was measured by an experienced pathologist and presented as a percentage score (range 0–100%) of positive tumor cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemistry (IHC), antibodies specific for ER (1:100 clone 6F11; Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), progesterone receptor (PR; clone 16; Novocastra), HER2 (4B5 rabbit monoclonal antibody; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA), and Ki-67 (MIB-1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) were stained using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections [17 (link)]. Positivity of ER and PR IHC expression was defined according to the modified Allred system: positive, Allred score 2–8; and negative, Allred score 0–1 [18 (link)]. All tumors included in this study had ER positivity (Allred scores ≥3). HER2 status was considered positive with a score of 3+ and negative with a score of 0 or 1+ [19 (link)]. Tumors with a score of 2+ underwent fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis according to the manufacturer’s instructions (PathVysion kit; Vysis, Downers Grove, IL, USA or HER2 inform; Ventana) [19 (link)]. Ki-67 expression was evaluated by YJC and displayed presented as a percentage (range 0–100%) of positive tumor cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!