The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

33 protocols using nebnext

1

cDNA Second Strand Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cDNA was immediately used for second strand synthesis. Briefly, 20 μl of cDNA solution was mixed with 10 μl of NEBNext (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) second strand synthesis reaction buffer, 5 μl of NEBNext second strand enzyme mix and 45 μl of nuclease free water (NFW), incubated at 16°C for 1 h and cooled at 4°C. dsDNA was purified with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, Indiana) at a bead: DNA volumetric ratio of 1.8:1 and eluted in 52 μl of NFW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive rRNA Depletion Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Figure 1A,B, Legacy Ribo-Zero (Illumina), RiboCop (Lexogen), and NEBNext (NEB) depletions were performed after linker ligation according to the manufacturer's recommendations. For Ribo-Zero depletion, we omit the final heating step in the manufacturer's protocol, as this has been suggested to improve depletion of small fragments (McGlincy and Ingolia 2017 (link)). For subsequent figures NEBNext and Ribo-Zero plus (Illumina) depletion were performed right after fragment size selection, while all other methods were performed after linker ligation. These methods were performed according to manufacturer recommendations, except that for some experiments with Ribo-Zero Plus we included 45% formamide in the hybridization reaction (indicated as F), as well as supplementary oligos (indicated as O), provided by Illumina, designed against abundant rRNA contaminants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transcriptome Analysis of Salt-Stressed Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After treated for 18 days, roots and shoots in the 6.4‰ saline treatment and the control were collected and stored at −80°C for transcriptome sequencing. Total RNA was extracted using Biozol reagent (Hangzhou, China). RNA quality was assayed using Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Samples with RNA integrity number higher than 8.0 were qualified. RNA concentration was measured using Qubit 2.0 assay. Poly(A)-tailed mRNA was enriched using oligo(dT) magnetic beads (NEB, USA) and then broken into short sequences in the fragmentation buffer. The first strand of cDNA was synthesized using random hexamers and the second strand was obtained using RNase H and DNA polymerase I. The double-stranded DNA was purified using QiaQuick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). After repair of ends using polymerase, DNA fragments were adenylated and ligated to sequencing adaptors (NEBNext, New England Biolabs, MA, USA), the DNA was size-selected by agarose electrophoresis, and fragments of 250–300 bp were amplified by PCR and then sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq X platform to collect paired-end reads. Three biological replicates were performed for each treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiplexed CRISPR Pooled Library Generation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pooled libraries for expression of dual sgRNAs were generated as detailed previously8 (link) and cloned into pPapi (Addgene 96921). Briefly, 552 S. aureus oligonucleotides were mixed with 552 S. pyogenes oligonucleotides at 5 µM each for extension with NEBNext (New England Biolabs) with annealing at 48 °C. Purified dsDNA was purified and ligated using 100 cycles of Golden Gate assembly with 100 ng insert and 500 ng of vector using BsmBI and T7 ligase per reaction. Libraries were were isopropanol precipitated and transformed into STBL4 electrocompetent cells. The 300k library resulted in 304,704 total pairings whereby 286,225 of these perturbations were gene;gene KOs and 15,008 were gene;non-targeting KOs. At 24 h before transfection, a density of 18 × 106 HEK293FT cells were seeded in each T175 flask in 30 ml of DMEM + 10% FBS. Transfection was performed using TransIT-LT1 (Mirus) transfection reagent. Beginning with 6 ml of Opti-MEM, a DNA mixture was prepared consisting of packaging plasmid pCMV_VSVG (Addgene 8454, 10 µg), psPAX2 (Addgene 12260, 40 µg), and the sgRNA-containing vector (e.g., pPapi, 40 µg). After a 20-min incubation the solution was added dropwise to the T175 flask and incubated for 6–8 h. Fresh media was added to the cells and collected 36 h later and snap frozen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparative Analysis of miRNA Library Prep Kits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experiments with NEBNext® (NEB), TruSeq® (Illumina), NEXFlex™ (Bioo Scientific), QIAseq (Qiagen), and SMARTer (Takara Bio) were performed following the manufacturers’ recommendations. For all kits, 1 pmol of the miRXplore™ Universal Reference (Miltenyi Biotec) was used as input to test accuracy in detection (Figs. 2 and 3). Brain total RNA (1 μg) was used for Fig. 3 for all kits with the exception of QIAseq, where 500 ng of total RNA was used as per the manufacturer’s recommendations. Libraries were prepared in triplicate for all experiments. To determine concentration and quality of libraries, all libraries were analyzed with an Agilent D1000 ScreenTape on a 2200 TapeStation instrument (Agilent) and then quantified with a Qubit dsDNA BR Assay kit on a Qubit 3.0 instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive RNA-seq Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted by ZYMO Research Quick-RNA MiniPrep kit from lysed 10 million of breast cancer cells in RNA Lysis Buffer, then removed most of gDNA with Spin-Away Filter. After that, the mixture of RNA was transferred with ethanol to Zymo-Spin IIICG column to remove trace DNA by DNase I on the column, then washed twice with RNA wash buffer followed by elution with 50 μl DNase/RNase-free water. RNA-seq library was prepared with NEBNext® Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (NEB #E7490). The Oligo dT Beads were washed with RNA binding buffer and incubated with total 1ug RNA to purify mRNA, followed with more washing by beads washing buffer. Then mRNA was eluted with elution buffer and reverse transcribed. After that, the first and the second strand cDNA were synthesized. After purification of Double-stranded DNA, adaptor was added. Adaptor-ligated DNA was enriched by PCR followed by purification, then the DNA library was sequenced with Illumina HiSeq3000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Whole Genome Sequencing of DNA Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA (2–5 μg) was subjected to mechanical fragmentation using a BioRuptor (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The number of cycles was adjusted to obtain DNA fragments of a final average size of about 500 pb. Samples were then used to prepare sequencing-amenable TruSeq libraries (NEB-Next, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Briefly, DNA fragments were made blunt-ended, phosphorylated, adenylated and Illumina-compatible adapters were ligated. After purification, barcoded sequences as well as Illumina-specific sequences were introduced by PCR, followed by quantitation of individual libraries. Libraries were then pooled and quantified again. A quality control of the pooled library made in bioanalyzer is shown in the figure, including an estimation of the percentage of non-overlapping reads that could be obtained using a 2x250 paired-end sequencing protocol. Library was qPCR-quantitated and brought to a final concentration of 10 nM. DNA was then denatured and equilibrated so that a final concentration of 18 pM of library was loaded onto a MiSeq v.3 flowcell (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and sequenced using a 2x250 paired-end sequencing protocol to obtain more than 400x high quality coverage (1.9–2.5 Gb) with 84% of the bases showing a Q30 factor > 30. Reads were finally split according to barcodes and used for bioinformatics analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

High-quality genome sequencing of Landoltia punctata

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Landoltia punctata clone 5635 (Lp5635, formerly DWC138) was received from the Rutgers Duckweed Stock Collective (RDSC; http://www.ruduckweed.org/). Lp5635 was collected, patted dry to remove excess water and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Frozen tissue was ground with a mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen. High molecular weight (HMW) DNA was isolated using a modified Bomb protocol (Oberacker et al., 2019 (link)). DNA quality was assessed on a Bioanalyzer and HMW status was confirmed on an agarose gel. Libraries were prepared from HMW DNA using NEBnext (NEB, Beverly, MA, USA) and 2 × 150 bp paired end reads were generated on the Illumina NovaSeq (San Diego, CA, USA). Resulting raw sequence was only trimmed for adaptors, resulting > 60× coverage of the diploid L. punctata genome (350 Mb).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protocol for dsRNA Sequencing Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from the cell culture pellet using TRIzol Reagent (Life technologies, UK) and ssRNA was removed by precipitation in 2 M lithium chloride (Sigma, UK) overnight as described (Maan et al., 2007 (link)). The dsRNA (8 μl) was denatured by heating at 95 °C for 5 min and the first cDNA strand was synthesised using SuperScript III RT (Life technologies, UK) and then the second strand was synthesised using NEBNext (New England BioLabs, UK) according to the manufacturers' instructions. Double stranded (ds) cDNA was purified using the Illustra GFX PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification kit (GE Healthcare, UK) and quantified with the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay kit (Life technologies, UK). The concentration of dscDNA was then adjusted to 0.2 ng/μl with 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 buffer. Libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT library preparation kit and sequencing was performed using MiSeq Reagent kit v2 (Illumina, USA) on the MiSeq benchtop sequencer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

DNA Sequencing of High-Purity Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All tumors used for sequencing had a tumor cell content higher than 90% confirmed by neuropathological evaluation of the hematoxylin and eosin stainings. Human clinical samples and data were collected after receiving written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approval from the respective institutional review boards. Purified DNA was quantified using the Qubit Broad Range double-stranded DNA assay (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Genomic DNA was sheared using an S2 Ultrasonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA). Whole-genome sequencing and library preparations were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA or NEBNext, NEB). The quality of the libraries was assessed using a Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Stockport, UK). Sequencing was performed using the Illumina X Ten platform. Information on available sequencing data for all cases are summarized in Supplementary Data file 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!