The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using 761 compact ic

1

Comprehensive Membrane Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples taken during the ED runs and the membrane characterization were analyzed for their ionic and carbon composition. Cations were measured via inductive-coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Optima 5300DV, Perkin Elmer, Waltham (HQ), MA, USA), and anions through ion chromatography (IC, 761 Compact IC, Metrohm, Tampa, FL, USA). A TOC analyzer (Shimadzu TOC-VCPH) was used to measure total carbon (TC), inorganic carbon (IC), and total organic carbon (TOC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Metabolites in P. bryantii Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein concentration was determined spectrophotometrically with the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method (55 (link)) using the reagent from Pierce. Bovine serum albumin served as the standard. Sodium was determined by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (AA240 instrument; Agilent Technologies). d-Glucose and acetate concentrations were determined as described previously (20 (link)). Gas chromatography–time-of-flight (GC-TOF) mass spectrometry was used to identify metabolites in the supernatant of a 1-liter P. bryantii overnight culture (OD600, ∼2) (56 (link)). Succinate was measured with an ion chromatograph (761 Compact IC; Metrohm) equipped with a Metrosep organic acid column (particle size, 9 μm; 250 by 7.8 mm; Metrohm) and an electron conductivity detector. To 9 ml 0.5 mM H2SO4, 1 ml of culture supernatant was added, and an aliquot of 20 μl was analyzed under isocratic conditions in 0.5 mM H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.5 ml min−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of TNT Biotransformation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TNT and its biotransformation products were detected with a HPLC (Thermo ScientificTM DionexTM UltiMateTM 3000) equipped with autoinjector, diode array detector, the column oven, and Supelcosil (C-8) column (150 by 4.6 mm; particle size, 5 μm), as described previously (Borch and Gerlach, 2004 (link); Khilyas et al., 2013 (link)). Nitrates and nitrites were detected using ion chromatograph 761 Compact IC (Metrohm, Sweden) equipped with a Metrosep A SUPP 5 column (150/4.0; particle size, 5 μm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Surface Water Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH and electrical conductivity of the lake surface water were measured using a pH meter (D-71; Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) and a conductivity meter (ES-51; Horiba), respectively. The additional analyses described below were performed at Chikyu Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd. (Geo-Science Laboratory, Nagoya, Japan) following the Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) methods (see Key Resources Table). The concentrations of Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ were determined using an atomic absorption spectrometer (SOLAAR S Series; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The concentration of NH4+ was measured by indophenol blue absorptiometry (UV–160; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The concentrations of Cl, NO2, NO3, SO42–, and PO43– were determined by ion chromatography (761 Compact IC; Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland). To determine the total nitrogen concentration, the water sample was digested with potassium persulfate and was analyzed by UV-spectrophotometry (UV–160; Shimadzu). Total phosphorus was determined by standard molybdenum-blue colorimetry following persulfate digestion. Total organic carbon was measured using a TOC Analyzer (TOC-VCPH; Shimadzu).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Porewater Sulfide and Sulfate Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Porewater samples for sulfide and sulfate concentration measurements were fixed in 5% zinc chloride solution directly after sampling. Between 10 and 1,000 µL sulfide samples were diluted with ultrapure water to reach a total sample volume of 2 mL. To each 2-mL sample, 160 µL diamine reagent was added. The sample was immediately closed and left to rest for a minimum of 30 min in the dark at room temperature. The spectrophotometer was zeroed using a cuvette filled with a blank (ultrapure water with the diamine reagent). Samples were briefly shaken, then measured on a spectrophotometer (1-cm path length of cuvette, 670-nm wavelength).
Sulfate concentrations of zinc chloride–treated porewater samples were determined by suppressed ion chromatography (IC) using a Metrohm 761 Compact IC (Metrohm A Supp 5 column) with CO2 suppression and online removal of zinc (Metrohm A PPC 1 HC matrix elimination column).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Volatile Fatty Acids and Thiosulfate in Microbial Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Culture samples (1,000 μl) were collected immediately after inoculation and after growth (63 h). Then, they were centrifuged for 10 min at 13,400 g (4°C). The supernatants were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −20°C until use. Volatile FAs were quantified using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; UltiMate 3000, Thermo Scientific) equipped with an Aminex HPX-87H-300 × 7.8 mm column C18 (Bio-Rad). The column temperature was 35°C and eluant (H2SO4, 0.005 N) was used at a flow rate of 0.6 ml min−1. Twenty microliters of supernatant were injected. The thiosulfate concentration was measured on an ion chromatograph (761 Compact IC, Metrohm) equipped with an anion exchange column (Metrosep A Supp1 – 250/4.6). Na2CO3 (3 mM) was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 ml min−1 during the first 8 min, followed by a flow rate of 2.5 ml min−1. The culture supernatants were diluted 10-fold before injection (20 μl). Hydrogen sulfide was quantified spectrophotometrically according to the Cord-Ruwisch method (Cord-Ruwisch, 1985 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Sediment and Water Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After collection, samples were immediately refrigerated, transported in polyethylene bottles and stored in the dark at 4°C until analysis. A subset of sediments or soil samples (n = 7) were dried at 40°C for 72 h and the organic matter content was estimated by loss on ignition method. Quantitative assessment of percentage for different grain sizes in the coarser fractions was performed by screening, using a standard series of sieves between 0.062 and 2 mm. Silt- and clay-sized material classification was obtained using automated SediGraph 5100 (Micromeritics, Norcross, USA). The texture classification was based on the United States Department of Agriculture soil texture diagram [30 ].
In a subset of water samples (n = 12) pH and electric conductivity were measured with multiparameter Crison MM40+ (Crison Instruments, Barcelona, Spain). Before use, electrodes were calibrated and/or tested for accuracy, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Laboratory analyses were performed for anions by ion chromatography with suppressed conductivity detection (761 Compact IC, Metrohm AG, Herisau, Switzerland) and for alkalinity by volumetric determination [31 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Groundwater Tracer Analysis Using IC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentration of the conservative tracer (bromide anion) and chloride (anion naturally present in the groundwater of the site) in the GW samples taken during the analyses were determined using an ionic chromatograph (Metrohm 761 Compact IC) with anionic chemical suppression, together with a conductivity detector. A Metrosep A SUPP5 5–250 column (25 cm length, 4 mm diameter) as a stationary phase was used and 250 μL of the sample was injected. The mobile phase was an aqueous solution of 3.2 mM of Na2CO3 and 1 mM of NaHCO3 at a flow rate of 0.7 ml min−1. A filtering device (0.45 μm) was included in the sample injection system. If necessary, the GW samples were diluted with Milli-Q water prior to their analysis. Standard solutions of sodium chloride (NaCl, Sigma-Aldrich) and sodium bromide (NaBr, Honeywell Fluka) were used for calibration.
The conductivity of the samples was also measured in the field with a portable pH/conductivity unit (Model 914 pH/Conductometer, Metrohm). Additionally, to get an estimation of the evolution of the test in real time, bromide concentrations were also measured in the field using an ion selective electrode (ISE) of bromides (crystal membrane electrode, Metrohm). Prior to the analysis, groundwater samples were diluted (1:2 in volume) using a TISAB (total ionic strength adjustment buffer) solution of KNO3 (1 M).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Aqueous Solution Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cations such as Na+, K+, and Mg2+ were determined using an ion chromatograph (761 Compact IC, Metrohm). PEG was measured using nephelometry, as described in a previous study [12 (link)]. Levels of sugar in the aqueous solutions and digest were measured using the enzyme method (Glu-CII, Wako, Singapore) and a spectrophotometer (Shimazu). The osmotic pressures of the aqueous solutions and digest were measured using the freezing point depressing method (OM6020, Arkley, Inc., Kyoto, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Major Ions in Seawater

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Major ions (Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cl and SO42−) in the pore water and overlying seawater samples were measured in the laboratory on land. All samples were diluted approximately 500 times before measurement and then analyzed using ion chromatography (Metrohm 761 Compact IC) with RSD <3%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!