The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using cellcapture software

1

PD-L1 Expression Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell surface expression of PD-L1 was determined by flow cytometry using APC-conjugated anti-human PD-L1 IgG1 antibody #14-5983-82 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by FITC-conjugated #115-095-003 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA). Baseline staining was determined by non-relevant isotype-matched control antibodies (#400102, Biolegend). Fluorescence was determined by Flow Cytometer S100EXi (Stratedigm, San Jose, CA, USA), using CELLCAPTURE software (Stratedigm) and analyzed by FLOWJO V10 (BD biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated on ice with 2 μL of anti-CD16/32 TruStain fcX (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) plus 10 μL of Brilliant Stain Buffer Plus (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) for 30 min. The cells were incubated with fluorochrome-labeled mAb for 30 min at RT in the dark then were washed twice with 3 mL flow cytometry buffer (PBS + 0.5% BSA + 0.1% NaN3). Cells were post-fixed with 200 μL IC Fixation buffer (Life Technologies Corp.) for 30 min at RT in the dark, then washed again with 3 mL flow cytometry buffer, and stored at 4 °C until analysis. Flow cytometry was performed on a Stratedigm S1200Ex (Stratedigm Inc., San Jose, CA) and data were analyzed with CellCapTure software (Stratedigm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Microglia M1/M2 Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-IL-6R Ab (Table S1) was used for IL-6R detection by flow cytometry as previously described [28 (link)]. Detection of myeloid M1/M2 markers [29 (link),30 (link)] in sorted microglia following a 48 h co-culture with melanoma cells was performed similarly using Abs against CD16, CD32, CD86, CD150, CD163, and CD206 (Table S1).
Antigen expression was determined using Flow cytometer S100EXi (Stratedigm, San Jose, CA, USA) with CellCapTure software (https://stratedigm.com/cellcapture/, accessed on 27 March 2023) (Stratedigm, Inc.) and FlowJo v10 (FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA). Dead cells were gated out from the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Intracellular Protein Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular staining was performed on fixed and permeabilized RMS and RT cell suspensions with Transcription Factor Buffer Set (BD Biosciences, Jose, CA) prior to staining with fluorochrome-conjugated anti-human antibodies following manufacturer's protocol with minor modifications. Briefly, cells were incubated in Fix/Perm buffer for 40 min, washed with Perm/Wash buffer, and incubated for 15 min with 2% rabbit/2% mouse normal sera to block nonspecific binding. Cells were then stained for 2 hrs with mixture of fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies in Perm/Wash buffer: Bcl-2 (clone 100) from BioLegend, MYOD1 (polyclonal) and NOG (polyclonal) from Bioss Antibodies, MYOD1 (clone SPM427) and myogenin (clone MGN185 + F5D) from Novus Biologicals, and ID1 (clone B-8) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, followed by staining with PE-streptavidin (Invitrogen) if biotinylated antibody was included in the staining mixture. The optimal antibody dilution was established by titration curve. Matching isotype controls were prepared as per standard flow cytometry protocols to determine background signals. All steps were performed on ice and samples kept in the dark. Flow cytometry was performed using an 8-color Stratedigm (San Jose, CA) S1000EX apparatus. Data were analyzed using CellCapTure software (Stratedigm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunophenotyping of Cell Surface Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated for 20 min on ice with 2 uL of anti-CD16/32 TruStain fcX (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) plus 10 uL of Brilliant Stain Buffer Plus (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Next, fluorochrome-labeled mAb were added, and the cells were incubated in the dark at RT for 20 min then were washed twice with 3 mL FACS buffer (1x PBS + 0.5% BSA + 0.1% NaN3). Cells were then fixed with 200 uL IC Fixation buffer (Life Technologies Corp.) at RT for 20 min in the dark, then washed again with 3 mL FACS buffer, and stored at 4°C in the dark until analyzed. Flow cytometry was performed on a Stratedigm S1200Ex (Stratedigm Inc, San Jose, CA) and results were analyzed with CellCapTure software (Stratedigm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

ICAM-1 Expression Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human ICAM‐1/CD54 Ab (0.5 µg; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MA, USA) followed by a secondary FITC‐conjugated goat anti‐mouse Ab (1 : 50; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) was used for ICAM‐1 detection using flow cytometry as previously described [22]. Antigen expression was determined using Flow Cytometer S100EXi (Stratedigm; San Jose, CA, USA) with cellcapture software (Stratedigm, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and flowjo v10 (BD biosciences, Ashland, OR, USA). Dead cells were gated out from the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenotypic Characterization of Murine B Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions were prepared from lymphoid organs by mechanical disruption, and stained with a mixture of fluorochrome-conjugated anti-mouse monoclonal antibodies to the following markers: B220 (clone RA3-6B2), IgM (11/41), GL7 (GL7) (from eBioscience/Affymetrix, San Diego CA), CD19 (6D5), CD21/35 (7E9), CD23 (B3B4) (from Biolegend, San Diego, CA) and CD1d (B3B4), CD95 (JO2), CD3 (145/2C11) (from BD Biosciences, San Jose CA). Dead cell exclusion was carried out in all samples using Live/Dead fixable violet dead cell stain kit (Life Technologies/Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). Samples were run on either a 12-color LSRII cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose CA) and analyzed by FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR) or 8-colors Stratedigm S1300 and analyzed by CellCapture software (Stratedigm, San Jose, CA). Bin cells were defined as CD19+/B220+, CD23+CD21/35highCD1dhigh. Gates for these markers were defined for every experiment based on the marker distribution on parallel samples of spleen B cells (CD23+ CD21/35low follicular B subset vs CD23lowCD21/35highCD1dhigh marginal zone B cell subset).
In adoptive transfer experiments, B220+ CD23+CD21/35low follicular B cells (FoB) were sorted from WT and TNFR1/2 KO mouse spleens using a Becton Dickinson FACSAria cell sorter (BD Biosciences, San Jose CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Intravascular Leukocyte Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated on ice for 30 min with 2 μL of anti-CD16/32 TruStain fcX (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) plus 10 μL of Brilliant Stain Buffer Plus (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Next, fluorochrome-labeled mAb were added, and the cells were incubated at RT in the dark for 30 min then were washed twice with 3 mL FACS buffer (PBS + 0.5% BSA + 0.1% NaN3). Cells were post-fixed with 200 μL IC Fixation buffer (Life Technologies Corp.) for 30 min at RT in the dark, then washed again with 3 mL FACS buffer, and stored at 4 °C in the dark until analyzed. Flow cytometry was performed on a Stratedigm S1200Ex (Stratedigm Inc, San Jose, CA) and analyzed with CellCapTure software (Stratedigm).
Intravascular leukocytes were distinguished from those located in brain parenchyma (extravascular) as previously described [39 (link)]. Briefly, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane then injected i.v. into the retroorbital sinus with 3 μg PE/Dazzle™-labeled anti-CD45 mAb (30-F11) in 50 μL of sterile 1× Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS). After 5 min, the mouse was euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation and exsanguinated. After tissue preparation, leukocytes were incubated with PE-Cy7-labeled CD45 mAb, as well as other markers. Using this technique, CD45+ cells bearing PE/Dazzle were considered intravascular, whereas those not bearing this label were deemed extravascular.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Protein Aggregation in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One milliliter of logarithmic cells were washed with PBS buffer and sonicated using 15 s pulses at 20% power. For each sample, 2*106 cells were resuspended with ProteoStat dye (Enzo Life Sciences) diluted 1:3000 in ProteoStat assay buffer. Cells were incubated for 15 min at room temperature protected from light. Flow cytometry was preformed using Stratedigm S1000EXi and the CellCapTure software (Stratedigm, San Jose, CA). Live cells were gated (P1) by forward scatter and side scatter. Fluorescence channels for FITC (530/30) and PE-Cy5 (676/29) were used utilizing a 488 nm laser source. A total of 50,000 events were acquired for each sample. Analyses were performed using FlowJo software (TreeStar, version 10). The results displayed are representative of three biological experiments performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Flow Cytometry for PD-L1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell surface expression of PD-L1 was determined by flow cytometry using mouse IgG1 antibodies against human PD-L1 (#14-5983-82, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies (#115-095-003, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Baseline staining was determined by isotype-matched control mouse IgG antibodies (#400102; Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Fluorescence was determined by Flow Cytometer S100EXi (Stratedigm, San Jose, CA, USA), using CELLCAPTURE software (Version 1; Stratedigm), and analyzed by FLOWJO V10 (Version 10.7.1; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!