The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hrp conjugated anti flag antibody

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

The HRP-conjugated anti-FLAG antibody is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and identification of proteins tagged with the FLAG epitope. The antibody is conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP), which allows for colorimetric or chemiluminescent detection of the target protein in various applications such as Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and ELISA.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

37 protocols using hrp conjugated anti flag antibody

1

Characterization of Leukocyte Adhesion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Sigma), HRP-conjugated anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma), APC PSGL-1 antibody (FLEG) (ThermoFisher), Human Fibronectin (ThermoFisher), DMSO (Sigma), Phalloidin Alex647 (ThermoFisher), RIPA buffer (Sigma), Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate (PMA, sigma), SLeX (Sigma), Biotinylated ECL (Vector Laboratories), PNGase F (New England Biolabs), Dihydrorhodamine 123 (DHR123) (ThermoFisher), ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (ThermoFisher), HRP-conjugated streptavidin (ThermoFisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Co-immunoprecipitation of GmGAMYB and GmGBP1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The constructed GmGBP1-TOPO was transferred to the expression vector pGWB506 by LR reaction (named 35S:GmGBP1-GFP). The constructed recombinant was introduced into Agrobacterium GV3101. Agrobacterium 35S:GmGAMYB-3F6H-pB7WG2 and 35S:GmGBP1-GFP were individually or collectively transformed into N. Benthamiana leaves (Hu et al., 2013 (link)) and were sampled 2 days later. After protein extraction with a Co-IP buffer [50 mM Na-phosphate pH7.4, 135 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 50 μM MG-132, 2 mM Na3VO4, 2 mM NaF, and Complete protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche)], 10 μl of Protein G-coupled magnetic beads (Dynabeads Protein G, Invitrogen) was used to capture anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma). After incubation at 4°C for 30 min, magnetic beads were washed three times for 5 min each time with 1 ml of Co-IP buffer without MG-132, Na3VO4, sodium fluoride, and protease inhibitor, and eluded with 2 × SDS sample buffer at 80°C for 5 min. At each sample, the immunoprecipitated proteins and 20 μl of the total extract were separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Then, HRP-conjugated anti-FLAG antibody (A8592, Sigma) and HRP-conjugated anti-GFP Antibody (AB6663, Abcam) were applied to test GmGAMYB-FLAG and GmGBP1-GFP protein, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Arabidopsis Protein Extraction and Co-IP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total Arabidopsis protein was extracted from 0.5 g of ground powder in 2 mL of extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 % Triton X-100, 5 mM EDTA, 1x Protease inhibitor cocktail [Sigma-Aldrich] and 1 mM PMSF) and centrifuged at 4 °C at maximum speed for 10 min. 50 μL input was taken from the supernatant and 1 mL protein extract were incubated with 20 μL of anti-FLAG-M2-Agarose beads (Sigma-Aldrich A2220) for 1.5 h at 4 °C. And then washed three times with wash buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20). Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using HRP-conjugated anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) and anti-H2A antibody (Abcam) as described above.
To detect the PIF4-RGA-H2A or IDD3-RGA-H2A complex, MYC-PIF4 or MYC-IDD3, HA-RGA and FLAG-H2A were transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves, and subsequent co-IP assays using rabbit anti-Myc polyclonal antibody conjugated agarose beads (Sigma-Aldrich A7470) were performed as described previously45 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Binding Assay of Fc Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ELISA was used to determine the binding capability of the selected proteins to various unrelated antigens. All Fc mutants (mFc, 1-B10-9, 1-D1-15) were expressed in E. coli HB2151, as described above. Antigens (gp140, mesothelin, ZIKV EDII, ZIKV EDIII, 5T4, PD-L1, OX40, TIM-3) were coated on 96-well ELISA plates (Corning, #3690) overnight with 100 ng/well in PBS at 4°C, and blocked with 100 µl per well of 3% MPBS (PBS with 3% milk) at 37°C for 1 h. The plates were washed with PBS with 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST), then threefold serial diluted proteins were added and incubated at 37°C for 1.5 h. Plates were washed five times with PBST and 50 µl of 1:1,000 HRP conjugated anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS were added per well before incubation at 37°C for 45 min. After extensive washes with PBST, the binding was measured by the addition of diammonium 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate) (ABTS) substrate (Roche Applied Science) and signal reading was carried out at 405 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nanobody Binding to LASV Glycoprotein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein ELISA was used to evaluate the binding ability of the selected nanobody binders toward the stabilized LASV GPC trimer. Briefly, a 96-well plate was coated with either the stabilized LASV GPC trimer or BSA at 5 μg/ml in PBS, 50 μl/well, at 4 °C overnight. After blocking with 100% superblock buffer, the nanobodies were diluted into 1 μg/ml using 10% PBST in 100% superblock and then added to the plate for incubation at room temperature for 1 h. Binding signal was detected by HRP-conjugated anti-Flag antibody (Sigma). For the competition ELISA, neutralizing antibodies D5, 19.7E, 8.11 G, and 37.7H were used to block the binding epitopes. An anti-Foldon antibody, MF4 were also used as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Yeast Rapamycin Response Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast grown in 5 mL synthetic complete media with or without rapamycin treatment were collected when OD600 reached 0.5. Yeast pellet was lysed with 200 μL of glass beads in 200 μL buffer containing 25 mM Tris at pH=8.0 and 150 mM NaCl. 1 μg of total yeast lysate was used for western blot against HRP-conjugated anti-Flag antibody (Sigma A8592).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Production and Purification of scFv Protein in P. pastoris

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For production of scFv protein, P. pastoris X33 cells, harboring the multicopy integrants, were grown overnight at 30°C in 50 mL BMGY (Buffered Glycerol-complex medium; 1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.0, and 1.34% YNB (Yeast Nitrogen Base, Invitrogen), 4×10−5% biotin and 1% glycerol) at 300 rpm. The next day, the cells were pelleted (2500 rpm, 10 min, RT), resuspended in 200 mL BMMY (Buffered Methanol-complex medium: 1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.0, 1.34% YNB, 4×10−5% biotin and 0.5% methanol), and grown for three days at 300 rpm; supplementing methanol (25 mL; 0.5%) was added each day to compensate for loss by evaporation. The culture medium was collected after the third day by centrifugation of cultures (2500 rpm, 10 min, RT), and the secreted scFvs were isolated by immobilized metal affinity chromatography, using Ni-NTA conjugated agarose beads (Qiagen) and elution with PBS containing 200 mM imidazole (Sigma). The purified proteins were diluted 1∶50 in PBS, tested by ELISA as described above, and detected using HRP conjugated anti-Flag antibody (diluted 1∶10,000 in PBS; Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Surface Expression of Mutant Receptors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface expression levels of WT and mutated hGCGR variants were tracked using a direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) against the N-terminal FLAG tag. In brief, cells were transfected and seeded in a white Poly-D-Lysine-coated 96-well plate as described for the functional cAMP accumulation assay. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were washed with 100 μl/well DPBS + 1 mM calcium chloride and fixed with 50 μl/well 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 5 min at room temperature. The wells were washed twice with 100 μl DPBS + 1 mM calcium chloride and blocked with 100 μl/well blocking solution (3% drymilk, 1 mM calcium chloride 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) for 30 min at room temperature. Hereafter 75 μl/well HRP-conjugated anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma Aldrich, A8592), diluted 1:2000 in blocking solution, was added and the plate was incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. The plate was washed four times with 100 μl/well blocking solution followed by four washes with 100 μl/well DPBS + 1 mM calcium chloride. The relative amount of present HRP was detected by adding 60 μl/well DPBS + 1 mM calcium chloride and 20 μl/well HRP substrate (Bio-Rad, 170–5060). The plate was incubated for 10 min at room temperature before recording of luminescence on an EnVision plate reader (Perkin Elmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of FLAG-Tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two μg of total protein per sample was loaded onto the NuPAGE 4%–12% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen# NP0321), along with 10 μL of Spectra Multicolor Protein Ladder (Thermo# 26634). Proteins were resolved at 200 V for 50 min in MOPS SDS running buffer. Following resolution, proteins were transferred to PVDF membrane (Invitrogen# LC2005) at 100 V for 60 min. The membrane was blocked in non-fat milk for 1 h to reduce non-specific binding. The blot was then probed with HRP conjugated anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma# A8592) at 1:2000 through overnight incubation at 4°C. The membrane was then washed multiple times with TBS buffer, supplemented with 0.1% Tween 20, to wash off excess unbound antibodies. SuperSignal West Femto Substrate (Thermo# 34095) was used to develop the blot, and it was imaged in the iBright FL1500 Imaging system (Thermo Fisher). A second NuPAGE gel, run with the same samples, was stained with SYPRO Ruby Protein Gel Stain (Invitrogen# S12001) following the manufacturer’s protocol and imaged to confirm equal loading.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunoprecipitation of Sirt1 and Interactors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10.106 cells were harvested, washed with PBS, and resuspended in lysis buffer (400 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 0.1% NP‐40, Sigma P8340); the NaCl concentration was then brought down to 150 mM; and samples were sonicated using a probe sonicator and then centrifuged at 17,000 rcf in order to remove insoluble material. The protein concentration of the lysates was measured using a BCA assay (Thermo Fisher, 23225), and equivalent protein quantities were then incubated with 50 μl of pre‐washed anti‐HA agarose beads (Sigma, A2095) overnight on a rotating wheel at 4°C. The samples were then incubated five times for 10 min with 1 ml of wash buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 0.1% NP‐40, protease inhibitors) on a rotating wheel at 4°C. Immunoprecipitates were eluted in Laemmli buffer at 95°C for 10 min. Similar elution volumes and protein quantities, for the IPs and the inputs, respectively, were loaded on a gel. Western blots were performed using anti‐Sirt1 (Abcam, ab32441), anti‐IPO7 (Abcam, ab99273), anti‐GFP (Abcam, ab5450), anti‐KAP1 (Merck, MAB3662), HRP‐conjugated anti‐Flag antibody (Sigma, A8592), HRP‐conjugated anti‐HA antibody (Sigma, 12013819001), HRP‐conjugated anti‐goat antibody (Dakocytomation, P0449), HRP‐conjugated anti‐rabbit antibody (Santa Cruz, sc‐2004), and HRP‐conjugated anti‐mouse antibody (GE Healthcare, NA931V).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!