The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using facs canto

1

Immune Cell Profiling by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was incubated with FITC CD19, PE Siglec-F, PerCP/Cy5 CD3, APC Gr-1, APC/Cy7 CD11c, PE/Cy7 CD45, eFluoro450 CD11b and Fc block (BioLegend, San Diego, CA). The cells were acquired on the FACS Canto and analyzed by using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR) as previously described (27 (link)). Neutrophils were gated as CD45+, Gr-1+, and CD11b+; macrophages as CD45+ and CD11c+; and Siglec-F+ cells and eosinophils as CD45+, Cd11c, and Siglec-F.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to CD90.1 (Thy1.1, OX-7), I-Ab (AF6-1201) and IFNγ (XMG1.2) were from BD PharMingen; mAbs to CD11b (M1/70), Gr1 (RB6-8C5), MHC-II (M5/114.15.2), Vβ8.1/8.2 (KJ16), CD8α (53–6.7), PD-1 (J43), Tim-3 (RMT3-23), TNF (MP6-XT22), I-Ak (11-5.2), and I-Ek (14-4-4S) were from eBioscience. Samples were initially incubated with 2.4G2 hybridoma supernatant to block antibody binding to the Fcγ receptors. In tumor samples, dead cells were identified by 7AAD (BD Pharmingen) staining and excluded by electronic gating. Intracellular stainings were performed using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit from BD (Cat. No. 554714). AccuCount Rainbow beads (Cat. No. ACRFP-100-3 Spherotech) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions to determine absolute counts of 2C cells in PBL. Data were acquired on a FACSCalibur or FACSCanto and analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Flow Cytometry in Biomedicine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was performed on a BDLSRII, BDFortessa, and FACSCanto, and data were analyzed with FlowJo (Treestar). Antibodies used are listed in Supplemental Experimental Procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA), Biolegend (San Diego, CA), BD (Franklin Lakes, NJ), or Invitrogen (Grand Island, NY). Live/Dead Fixable Aqua (Invitrogen) or DAPI was used for live/dead discrimination. ILCs were defined as CD45.2+, CD90.2+, lineage negative. Lineage markers included TCRβ, CD3, CD11c, and B220 or CD19, Gr-1, CD11b, and CD5. The Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience) was used for transcription factor stains. For intracellular cytokine stains, samples were fixed with 1.6% PFA and stained in 0.5% saponin after stimulation. Samples were collected on a BD LSRII or FACs Canto and analyzed using Flowjo software (Treestar). For cell sorting, CD4+ T cells were enriched by negative selection as previously described35 (link), and further sorted on DAPI- CD4+ B220-CD8β-IAb-CD11c-CD11b-Gr1-NK1.1- cells. For Treg transfers, CD4-enriched cells from Foxp3-GFP mice were additionally sorted on GFP+ cells. Sorting was performed on a BD Aria.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Activation of CD4+ T-cells: Signaling Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5 × 105 CD4+ T-cells were stimulated in 24-well flat bottom plates with either phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA; 10−7 M; Sigma Aldrich) for 30 minutes or anti-CD3/anti-CD28 coated microbeads (2.5 × 105) for 24 hours in the presence of 10 mg/L AZM, 100 nM RAPA or in antibiotic-free medium. Subsequently, cells were harvested and incubated for ten minutes in Fixation Buffer I (BD Phosflow, BD Biosciences) at 37°C. After washing in PBS + 0.5% BSA + 0.05% NaN3 cells were resuspended in pre-chilled (−20°C) Permeabilization Buffer III (BD Phosflow, BD Biosciences) and kept on ice for 30 minutes followed by washing the cells twice in PBS + 0.5% BSA + 0.05% NaN3. Then, cells were incubated with one of the following antibodies: 20 μL of a p-ERK (T202/Y204; Pacific Blue conjugated; clone 20A), p-p38 (T180/Y182; PE conjugated; clone 36/p38) or p-S6RP (S240; Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated; clone N4-41; all BD Phosflow, BD Biosciences) specific monoclonal antibodies or isotype matched control antibodies for one hour. After washing in PBS + 0.5% BSA + 0.05% NaN3 cells were cells were analyzed on a FACS Canto flow cytometer using FlowJo software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of B-cell Receptor Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For quantification of CD79A/B expression, cells were washed and blocked in 5% serum for 30 min at room temperature before staining with PE-conjugated anti-CD79A antibody, FITC-conjugated anti-CD79B antibody, PE-conjugated anti-CD19, and control antibody (goat immunoglobulin, Thermo Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA). To measure intracellular expression of phospho-Lyn, phospho-Btk, phospho-Syk, and phospho-PI3K, cells were washed, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, and permeabilized with 0.1% saponin. Cells were incubated with antibody against phospho-Lyn, phospho-Btk, or phospho-PI3K (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and a secondary goat anti-rabbit Cy5-conjugated antibody (Thermo Scientific) or phospho-Src (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA) and secondary goat anti-rabbit FITC-conjugated antibody (Thermo Scientific) for 30 min each at room temperature. Flow cytometric data were acquired on a FACSCanto and analyzed using FlowJo software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mitochondrial membrane potential was examined using The MitoProbe™ DiIC1(5) Assay Kit (Molecular Probe, USA). C2C12 myoblast cells was pre-incubated with either GT (100 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of TNFα (20 ng/mL) for 24 h. Then, cells were stained with 5 μl of 10 μM DiIC1(5) for 15 min at 37°C followed by one wash in PBS buffer. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 5 min and resuspended in 500 μl of PBS. Fluorescence was analyzed using a FACS Canto and data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., USA). The approximate excitation and emission peaks of DiIC1(5) are 638 nm and 658 nm, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunophenotyping of Mouse and Human Leukemia Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary leukemia cells from premorbid mice were harvested and treated with ammonium chloride potassium (ACK) buffer to lyse mature red cells. Cells were then blocked with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (FcBlock) and stained with an antibody cocktail containing 145-2C11 (CD3e), GK1.5 (CD4), 53-6.7 (CD8), RB6-8C5 (Ly-6G/Gr-1), M1/70 (CD11b/Mac-1), TER119 (Ly-76/TER119), 6B2 (CD45R/B220), 2B8 (CD117/c-Kit), D7 (Ly-6A/E/Sca-1) and A2F10 (CD135/Flt3). For human MV-4-11, cells were harvested, blocked and stained with BV10A4H2 for human CD135/FLT3. All antibodies were purchased from eBioscience or Biolegend. Flow cytometric analyses were performed on FACSCanto, MoFlo XDP or CyAn ADP flow analyzers, and data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Murine Immune Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All antibodies were purchased BD Biosciences or Biolegend. To evaluate T cell subsets, monocytes, and macrophages frequency, spleen, lymph nodes, and thymus were isolated and mashed with nylon mesh (Spectrum). Red blood cells were removed using RBC lysis buffer (eBioscience), and cells were washed, and stained with adequate antibodies and isotype controls for FACS analysis. For intracellular cytokines staining, cells were stimulated at 37°C for 6 hrs in the presence of Golgistop (BD Biosciences), PMA (Sigma), and ionomycin (Sigma). CD4CD8, CD4+CD8, CD4CD8+, CD4+CD8+, TH1 (CD4+IFNγ+), TH2 (CD4+IL-4+), TH17(CD4+IL-17A+), Treg (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+) cells were gated for FACS analysis. All FACS data was acquired using FACS Canto, and were analyzed with Flowjo software (Treestar, Ashland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Allergic Airway Inflammation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed 24h after the last allergen challenge, by intratracheally injecting and aspirating 0.8 ml saline twice. After its collection the BALF was centrifuged for 5 min at 1500 rpm. The cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml PBS and an aliquot was stained with trypan blue solution and cells were counted using a Neubauer chamber. Eosinophils and neutrophils were detected by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. The cell surface staining was performed with antibodies against CD3, GR-1 (BD Bioscience, Heidelberg, Germany), anti-CCR3 (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and CD45R (eBioscience, Frankfurt, Germany) for 30 min at 4°C. The samples were analyzed by using a FACS-Canto and FlowJo (Treestar Inc).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!