The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chemstation for gc ms

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United Kingdom

ChemStation for GC-MS is a software suite designed for the operation and data analysis of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) instruments. It provides a comprehensive platform for instrument control, data acquisition, and data processing.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using chemstation for gc ms

1

GC-MS Analysis of Sulforaphane Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GC–MS analysis was performed on an Agilent 7693/5975 GC–MS autosampler system (Agilent, Manchester, UK). The sample was injected onto a HP-5MS 15 m non-polar column DB-5MS (J and W scientific, Santa Clara, CA, USA) (0.25-μm film thickness, 0.25 mm I.D.). The injection temperature was 250 °C in split mode (1:20). The oven temperature was programmed from 40 to 320 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min until 250 °C. The carrier gas was helium, with flow rate of 1.1 mL/min and pressure of 7.1 psi. Mass spectra were obtained by electron ionization at 70 eV, and mass scan from 35 to 500 amu. A total of 1 μL of the sample was injected, and compounds were separated during a 42 min run. Compounds were identified using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) library and literature ion data (Table 3; see Figure S3 for GC-MS chromatograms) and quantified based on an external standard calibration curve. Five concentrations (0.15–0.5 mg/mL) of sulforaphane standard (Sigma Aldrich, Dorset, UK) were prepared in DCM (r2 = 0.99). Data analysis was performed using ChemStation for GC-MS (Agilent, Manchester, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

GC-MS Analysis of PAH Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All glassware was prepared as described elsewhere (15 (link)). The internal standard 2-methylnaphthalene (Acros Organics) (10 mg) dissolved in 1 ml of methanol (HPLC grade) was used (final concentration, 2 mg liter−1). All filters, along with the supernatants, were included in the solvent extractions to determine any residual PAH. Each PAH was extracted three times as described previously (15 (link)) (Fisher Scientific) using ethyl acetate (Fisher Scientific). Samples were resuspended in 1 ml of dichloromethane (HPLC grade; Acros Organics) and separated by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using an Agilent 7890 GC interfaced with an Agilent 5975C MS. Samples were injected with a 1-μl splitless injection (injector temperature, 250°C) onto an Rtx-1MS column (30 m by 250 μm by 0.25 μm) using helium as the carrier gas at a constant flow of 1 ml min−1. Oven temperatures were programmed with an initial increase from 40°C to 300°C at 10°C min−1 and a final hold at 300°C for 10 min. The transfer line was held at 230°C onto a source for the MS, which was in full-scan mode (scan range, 50 to 650 Da). Data were analyzed and integrated using ChemStation for GC-MS (Agilent), and the mass spectra of putative metabolites were identified by library comparison.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Glucosinolate Hydrolysis in Eruca Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The major hydrolysis products produced by Eruca leaves, sativin and erucin, were investigated and extracted according to the protocol of Bell et al. (2020) (link). GC–MS was performed on an Agilent 7693/5975 GC–MS with autosampler (Agilent, Manchester, UK). 1 μL of each sample was injected into VF-5ht 15 m column (0.1 μm film thickness, 0.25 mm I.D.; Agilent). Injection temperature was 250°C in split mode (1:20); oven temperature was programmed from to 40°C at a rate of 5°C/min until 320°C. Carrier gas was helium, with a flow rate of 1.1 mL/min and a pressure of 1.4 psi. Mass spectra were obtained by electron ionization at 70 eV, and mass scan from 35 to 500 amu. Compounds were identified using literature ion data and quantified based on integrated peak areas of an external standard calibration curve of AITC (Sigma). Five concentrations of AITC were prepared from a stock of in dichloromethane (DCM), ranging from 0 to 10 μM (r2 = 0.999; y = 1E+06). Data analysis was performed using ChemStation for GC–MS (Agilent). Data are expressed in nmol g-1 dry weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction and Analysis of Diamondoid Carboxylic Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All glassware was prepared as described previously (Johnson et al., 2011). The internal standard was 4‐phenylbutanoic acid (Acros Organics) (10 mg) dissolved in 0.1 M NaOH (final concentration 2 mg l−1) and added to each culture immediately prior to extraction. Samples were acidified to pH 2 using concentrated HCl, and the diamondoid carboxylic acids were extracted from the supernatants three times using 15 ml of ethyl acetate (HPLC grade; Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) as previously described (Johnson et al., 2011). Solvent extracts were pooled, dried with 5–10 g anhydrous Na2SO4 (Fisher Scientific), and concentrated by rotary evaporation (Buchi) at 40°C. Samples were transferred to a gas chromatography vial (Chromacol) and stored at −20°C. Samples were injected with a 1 µl splitless injection (injector temperature 250°C) onto a 30 m x 250 µm x 0.25 µm Rtx – 1MS column using helium as the carrier gas at a constant flow of 1 ml min‐1. Oven temperatures were as follows: an increase from 40 to 250°C at 10°C min‐1 followed by a final hold at 250°C for 10 min. The transfer line was held at 230°C onto a source for the MS which was in full‐scan mode (scan range 50–650 Da). Data were analysed and integrated using ChemStation for GC‐MS (Agilent, Stockport, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of GSLs and GHPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GSLs and GHPs were extracted following the methods described by Bell et al. [43 (link)] and Bell et al. [44 (link)], respectively, with modifications as described in our earlier paper Oloyede et al. [38 ]. GSLs were extracted with 70% methanol, analysed by LC-MS/MS (Agilent, Bracknell, UK), and quantified using sinigrin hydrate standard. Six concentrations of sinigrin hydrate (14–438 µg/mL) were prepared with 70% methanol and used to prepare an external calibration curve (r2 = 0.996). Compounds were identified using their mass parent ion, characteristic ion fragments and through comparing with ion data from literature (Table 1).
GHPs were extracted using dichloromethane and analysed by GC-MS (Agilent, Manchester, UK). Compounds were identified using the literature on ion data (Table 2; see Supplementary Figure S1 for GC-MS chromatograms) and quantified based on an external standard calibration curve. Five concentrations (0.15–0.5 mg/mL) of sulforaphane standard (Sigma Aldrich, UK) were prepared in DCM (r2 = 0.99). Data analysis was performed using ChemStation for GC-MS (Agilent, Manchester, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!