The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using sc 365858

1

Quantifying Inflammatory Proteins in Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescent staining was used to quantify TNF-α, IL-10, nitrotyrosine, MOMA-2, and NF-κB p65 proteins using techniques previously described by our laboratory [86 (link)]. Tissues were stained using the following primary antibodies: TNF-α (1:250; Abcam, ab6671), IL-10 (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology SC-365858), nitrotyrosine (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, SC-32757) MOMA-2 (1:500, Abcam ab33451), and NF-κB p65 (1:500, Abcam, ab86299). Secondary antibodies used were anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 555, anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 546, anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 555, anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor Plus 488, and anti-rat Alexa Fluor 488. Slides were imaged under fluorescent microscopy at 40x with the appropriate excitation/emission filter, digitally recorded, RGB overlay signals were split and analyzed for specific fluorescence using image densitometry with Image J software (NIH). A minimum of 3–4 locations on each section (4 sections per slide), 3 slides, and n = 3 per group were used for analysis; 40x images were used for image quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Maxillary Molar

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After sacrifice, the trimmed maxillae were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h. After decalcified in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for 4 weeks, the tissues were then embedded by paraffin. Four-micrometer consecutive horizontal sections were obtained from the middle to apical third of the maxillary first molar, and sections from similar position of the roots were used for histological study. Immunohistochemistry was performed with a two-step detection kit (Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology, Beijing, China) as previously described [39 (link)]. The positive staining cells were counted in five different slides from each sample (N = 5–6). The final result came from the average of three tests.
The primary antibodies were anti-CBS (1:100, ab135626, Abcam), anti-TNF-α (1:100, ab1793, Abcam), anti-IFN-γ (1:50, sc1377, Santa Cruz), anti-IL-10 (1:200; sc-365858, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX), and anti-CD206 (1:200, ab64693, Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Cardiac Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparation of LV homogenates, electrophoresis and western blotting were described previously [27 (link)]. The following antibodies were used: TRAF3IP2 (1:600; #bs-6202R, Bioss), p65 (1:1000; #8242, CST), phospho-p65 (Ser536; 1:1000; #3031, cell signaling technology, Inc or CST), c-Jun (1:1000; #9165, CST), phospho-c-Jun (Ser63, 1:1000; #9261, CST), p38 MAPK (1:1000; #9212, CST), phospho-p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182, 1:1000; #9211, CST), S6K1 (1:1000, #9202, CST), phospho-S6 K (Thr389, 1:1000, #9205, CST), ANP (1:200, #sc20158, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), IL-10 (1:200, #sc-365858, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc) and GAPDH (1:1000, sc-25778, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Macrophage Phenotype and Cytokine Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies used were as follows: rabbit anti-RhoA (1 : 300, Abcam, ab187027), rabbit anti-ROCK (1 : 200, Abcam, ab125025), rabbit anti-CD 68 (1 : 200, Abcam, ab125212), rabbit anti-CD80 (1 : 200, Abcam, ab215166), rabbit anti-CD163 (1 : 200, Abcam, ab182422), rabbit anti-CD206 (1 : 200, Abcam, ab64693), rabbit anti-inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS, 1 : 200, Abcam, ab178945), mouse antitumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α, 1 : 200, Santa Cruz, sc-52746), mouse anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6, 1 : 300, Abcam, ab9324), and mouse anti-IL-10 (1 : 200, Santa Cruz, sc-365858).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!