The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ge signa hdxt 1.5t

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The GE Signa HDxt 1.5T is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system designed for diagnostic imaging. It utilizes a 1.5 Tesla (T) superconducting magnet to generate the magnetic field necessary for MRI imaging. The system is capable of producing high-quality images for a variety of clinical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using ge signa hdxt 1.5t

1

Anesthesia Protocol for Porcine MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI studies were performed on GE Signa HDxt 1.5T and GE Signa HDxt 3.0 T MRI scanners (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). Prior to the MRI scans, all pigs were initially anesthetized by intra-muscular injection of 5 mg/kg telazol and 2 mg/kg xylazine. All pigs then underwent endotracheal intubation to allow for respiratory control during the MRI scanning. Anesthesia was maintained during MRI scanning using 2% isoflurane.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating White Matter Hyperintensities using MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MRI scanner used was GE Signa HDxt 1.5T superconducting magnetic resonance scanner (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). All patients completed routine cranial MRI examinations, including T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, fluid attenuation inversion recovery, and other sequences.
WMH was evaluated blindingly by one experienced neurologist and one experienced radiologist and reassessed by another neurologist when the results were inconsistent. Fazekas scale was used to score WML severity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images (17 (link)). Paraventricular white matter (0 = no lesion; 1 = cap or pencil-like thin layer lesions; 2 = a halo of smooth lesions; and 3 = paraventricular irregular high signal and extending to deep white matter) and deep-brain white matter (0 = no lesions; 1 = punctate lesion; 2 = lesions start to fuse; 3 = large area fusion of lesions) were evaluated. The sum of the two scores was the total score of Fazekas. Furthermore, Fazekas grade was made according to the sum of the subcortical and bilateral paraventricular lesions: 0, grade 0; 1–2, grade I; 3–4, grade II; and 5–6, grade III (Figure 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Maternal Factors and Neonatal Adiposity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At recruitment, maternal age, ethnicity, highest educational attainment, household income, and self-reported pre-pregnancy weight were collected through interviewer-administered questionnaires. At the 26-28 week antenatal visit, maternal height (SECA213 Stadiometer, SECA Corp, Hamburg, Germany) and venous fasting plasma glucose [Advia 2400 Chemistry system (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Deerfield, IL, USA) and Beckman LX20 Pro analyser (Beckman Coulter, USA)] were measured. Tobacco exposure was assessed through plasma cotinine and interviewer-administered questionnaires 23 (link). Total gestational weight gain was calculated from pre-pregnancy weight and last measured antenatal weight. Gestational age was calculated from the first trimester ultrasound scan. Infant sex and maternal hypertensive disorders (including chronic hypertension, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and pre-eclampsia) were obtained from medical records. In a subset of neonates (N=160) whose parents consented, neonatal abdominal adiposity, namely the subcutaneous adipose tissue, superficial subcutaneous adipose tissue, deep subcutaneous adipose tissue, and intraabdominal adipose tissue volumes were measured by magnetic resonance imaging using a GE Signa HDxt 1.5T magnetic resonance scanner (GE Healthcare) within 2 weeks from delivery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!