The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

936 protocols using stata v 13

1

Postpartum Weight Management Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary analysis was by intention to treat (ITT), comparing BMI (kg/m2) between study groups at 12 months postpartum. For all primary and secondary outcomes, multilevel linear models fitted cluster (maternity unit) and individual effects. BMI data were log-transformed for all regression analyses and baseline BMI as well as variables used to balance the randomisation included as covariates. The intervention effect for BMI was therefore interpreted as the percentage difference between groups. Two-level logistic models were used for categorical outcomes. The impact of individual demographic factors as well as theoretical mediators on the intervention effect was investigated (self-efficacy, social support, intrinsic motivation and self-regulation) [20 (link)]. Pre-specified subgroups were examined formally using interaction terms for parity, social class, ethnicity and smoking status. A complier average causal effect (CACE) analysis investigated the effect of intervention group attendance on the primary outcome. The influence of missing data was assessed using multiple imputation under a missing at random assumption. Sensitivity analyses were examined for departures towards missing not at random. All primary and secondary analyses were performed in IBM SPSS Statistics 20 and STATA v13, imputation was performed in STATA v13.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Glycemic Variability and Fasting Duration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical procedures were performed on SPSS v. 22 and STATA v. 13. Data preparation was done using Excel 2011 and STATA v. 13. Significance was set at alpha = 0.05 (95%CI) for all tests. Repeat measures ANOVA were performed for measuring changes in anthropometric and biochemical changes.
The group means and standard deviations of days 1 through 42 (6 wk total study time) were calculated individually for three daily measurements: fasted morning (M), random afternoon (A), and postprandial evening (E) SMBG measurements. Linear and quadratic regression of group means and standard deviations were used to explore the relationship between study phase and SMBG.
OLR was used to explore the impact of relative daily fasting duration on SMBG. Cut-offs for OLR were created using standards for the diabetic fasting goal (< 7.0 mmol/L) and frank hyperglycemia (> 11.1 mmol/L), with an additional midpoint (9.05 mmol/L). The variable created for OLR was the hours fasted difference (HFD), the difference between actual hours fasted and the average hours fasted during the baseline phase (Table 1).
No category was created to represent hypoglycemic events, as none were recorded throughout the duration of the study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Maternal Health Facility Access Trial

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PHCUs were eligible for trial participation if health centres had a standalone MWH or a room designated for this purpose. All 26 health units in the three districts were eligible and 24 were randomly selected for the trial using a random number generator in STATA v13.
Women of reproductive age were eligible to participate in the trial if they were living in the villages within the selected PHCU catchment areas and had a pregnancy outcome (livebirth, stillbirth, spontaneous/induced abortion) up to 12 months prior to a survey round; baseline surveys commenced in October 2016 and endline surveys are scheduled to begin in April 2019. Lists of pregnant women registered by HEWs at health posts and Women’s Development Army volunteers within villages (‘kebeles’) function as the sampling frame for selection of eligible women at each survey time point. Names of women, their village of residence and their date of delivery organized by PHCU are included in the sampling frame. Random numbers generated in STATA v13 were assigned to each woman in the list, ranked, and then the required number sequentially selected. Since women were not excluded based on prior participation in surveys, it is possible that there is some overlap of participation in baseline and endline surveys, but the probability is expected to be low.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Seroprevalence and Vaccination Coverage Survey

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An alpha of 0.05 was set for tests of statistical significance. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS v9.3 (Cary, NC, USA) and STATA v 13.1 (College Station, TX, USA). Briefly, sampling weights were calculated to take each stage of selection into account, including the probability of selecting the original EAs in the 2010 DHS. A non-response adjustment by strata was included using the weighting class approach. Final weights were scaled to conform to the regional distribution of the population in the 2008 census [34 ]. Estimates of seroprevalence and coverage with 95% (logit) confidence intervals (CI) were calculated accounting for survey design (STATA v13.1). Second-order Rao-Scott Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in seroprevalence across age groups, regions, and rural/urban residence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Leishmania Infectiousness in Rodents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Established experimental infection was defined as the presence of one or more condition: development of skin lesions associated with symptomatic rodent ZCL, detection of splenomegaly at necropsy, qPCR detection of Leishmania in tissue samples (ear skin, liver, spleen), or infectiousness to sand flies. For statistical analyses, Leishmania loads were log10+1 transformed and tested using general linearised Poisson models (negative binomial over-dispersion coefficient α<0.088, χ2<0.94, P>0.281 in each case). The relationships between infectiousness (proportion of sandflies infected) or presence/absence of skin lesions against independent variables were analysed using logistic regression weighted by sample sizes. Depending on the outcome of interest, multivariate analysis adjusted for covariates including inoculum size (high dose or low dose), skin tissue log10 parasite load, inoculum size × skin log10 load interaction term, times to lesion onset and lesion recovery, and rodent species. All analyses were carried out using Stata v.13.1 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Impact of Emotional Labor and Workplace Violence on Employee Well-being in Korea

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine the impact of emotional labor and workplace violence on depression, sleep, and health status in wage earners in Korea, we analyzed the 2011–2014 KWCS data as follows: The differences in workers’ emotional labor and workplace violence according to demographic characteristics and work environments were analyzed with χ2 test or t-test. With reference to previous literature and variables measured in our data, gender, age, education level, wage, and job group were measured as sociodemographic variables, and job position, weekly work hours, work type (public, private), workplace size (number of employees), length of current employment in years, number of days of night overtime per month, and form of work were analyzed as work environment variables. In addition, the influence of emotional labor and workplace violence on general health status (subjective), depression or anxiety disorder, and insomnia or sleep disturbance was statistically analyzed using logistic regression. Sociodemographic and work environment variables that may influence the dependent variables (general health status, depression or anxiety disorder, and insomnia or sleep disturbance) were entered as independent variables in each analysis to control for them. All analyses were performed using the STATA v.13.1 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Adherence to Cancer Screening Recommendations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary outcomes were adherence to LS cancer screening recommendations for CRC, EC, OC, and GC. Secondary outcomes were need and importance of being screened for the above cancers, interpretation of genetic test results, perceived risk of and worry about CRC relapse. Summary statistics were calculated for continuous variables; frequencies were calculated for categorical variables. Exploratory association tests were conducted using the Fisher exact test to compare 2 categorical variables, the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare categorical and continuous variables, and Spearman correlation to compare 2 continuous variables (p < .05 was considered statistically significant). Stata v13.1 software (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX) was used for all analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cancer Screening Behaviors and Genetic Counseling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary outcomes were cancer screening behaviors for CRC, EC, OC, and GC as well as having genetic counseling. Secondary outcomes were need and importance of being screened for the above cancers, and perceived risk of and worry about being diagnosed with cancer. Summary statistics were calculated for continuous variables; frequencies were calculated for categorical variables. Exploratory association tests were conducted using the Fisher exact test to compare 2 categorical variables, the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare categorical and continuous variables, and Spearman correlation to compare 2 continuous variables. p < .05 was considered statistically significant. Stata v13.1 software (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX) was used for all analyses. We considered both random-effects model and generalized estimating equation (GEE) to account for possible correlations among participants from the same family. However, due to small sample size, these approaches failed to converge for the majority of outcome variables. For a few variables that the model converged, the estimate of correlation was low and the results were very similar to those assuming independence, suggesting that the within-family correlation may be negligible. Based on these considerations, our analysis assumed independence to obtain more reliable estimates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibilities of all the strains were determined according to CLSI M24-A2 guidelines, using the corresponding control strains [20 ] and employing the microdilution method with RAPMYCO panels (ThermoFisher, Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA). These panels contain amikacin (AMI), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AUG2), cefepime (FEP), cefoxitin (FOX), ceftriaxone (AXO), ciprofloxacin (CIP), clarithromycin (CLA), doxycycline (DOX), imipenem (IMI), linezolid (LZD), minocycline (MIN), moxifloxacin (MXF), tigecycline (TGC), tobramycin (TOB), and co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, SXT). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined following Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute interpretative criteria [27 ]; intermediate values were categorized as resistant. Susceptibility to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and linezolid was tested using the E-test (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). Susceptibility rates across strains belonging to the main species from the soil and human sources were compared using the χ2 test or two-tailed Fisher’s exact test as required. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. All calculations were performed using STATA v.13.1 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Meta-Analysis of Surgical Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The meta-analysis was performed on Stata v.13.0 software (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA). Dichotomous and continuous variables were pooled as weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR), respectively. 95% Confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess all data. The degree of heterogeneity was measured by the I2 statistic, when I2 > 50%, heterogeneity was considered significant statistically. The data were analyzed by a random-effect model; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. All statistical tests were performed two-sided, and p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Subgroup analysis was also carried out according to study design, setting, number of sample, and region. Sensitivity analysis was performed by omitting individual studies one by one for some outcomes such as OT, WIT, EBL, and LOS. Since there were less than 10 studies in this meta-analysis, funnel plot was not used to assess publication bias.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!