The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gentra puregene cell kit

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in Germany, United States, Netherlands, Spain, Belgium

The Gentra Puregene Cell Kit is a DNA purification product designed for the isolation of genomic DNA from a variety of cell types. The kit utilizes a simple and efficient protocol to extract high-quality DNA from samples, suitable for downstream applications such as PCR, sequencing, and other molecular biology techniques.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

169 protocols using gentra puregene cell kit

1

Genomic DNA Extraction and Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was prepared from the ear punching with Gentra Puregene Cell Kit (Qiagen), or from embryos at various developmental stages with Gentra Puregene Cell Kit or AllPrep DNA/RNA FFPE Kit (Qiagen). All experiments were conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions. Approximately 1–100 ng of DNA was used for genotyping by PCR analysis. Information of primers was shown in Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genomic DNA Extraction and Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomic DNA was prepared from the ear punching with Gentra Puregene Cell Kit (Qiagen), or from embryos at various developmental stages with Gentra Puregene Cell Kit or AllPrep DNA/RNA FFPE Kit (Qiagen). All experiments were carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. Approximately 1-100 ng of DNA was used for genotyping by PCR analysis. Information of primers was shown in Appendix table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Gestational Diabetes Cohort Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Women with a singleton pregnancy in their 1st trimester were recruited from a founder population of French-Canadian origin (Saguenay area, Canada) and followed until delivery. Women over 40 years old and those with pre-gestational diabetes or other disorders known to affect glucose metabolism were excluded. The Chicoutimi Hospital Ethics Committee approved the project. All women provided written informed consent before inclusion in the study; 174 women who provided genetic consent were included in this analysis. Maternal anthropometric measurements were performed using standardized procedures. Glucose tolerance was assessed using a 75g OGTT performed at 24–30 weeks’ gestation. Blood glucose levels were measured on fresh serum samples using a Beckman analyzer (model CX7; Fullerton, CA). Serum adiponectin levels were measured by ELISA (B-Bridge International). DNA was extracted from maternal blood samples using the Gentra Puregene Cell Kit (Qiagene, Valencia, CA). Newborns characteristics were collected at birth from clinical records.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gestational Diabetes Cohort Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Women with a singleton pregnancy in their 1st trimester were recruited from a founder population of French-Canadian origin (Saguenay area, Canada) and followed until delivery. Women over 40 years old and those with pre-gestational diabetes or other disorders known to affect glucose metabolism were excluded. The Chicoutimi Hospital Ethics Committee approved the project. All women provided written informed consent before inclusion in the study; 174 women who provided genetic consent were included in this analysis. Maternal anthropometric measurements were performed using standardized procedures. Glucose tolerance was assessed using a 75g OGTT performed at 24–30 weeks’ gestation. Blood glucose levels were measured on fresh serum samples using a Beckman analyzer (model CX7; Fullerton, CA). Serum adiponectin levels were measured by ELISA (B-Bridge International). DNA was extracted from maternal blood samples using the Gentra Puregene Cell Kit (Qiagene, Valencia, CA). Newborns characteristics were collected at birth from clinical records.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genome-wide CRISPR Screen of H358 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cas9-expressing H358 cells were transduced with the sgRNA library-expressing virus at a MOI of 0.3 and a coverage of 500X. Puromycin was added 2 days after transduction at a concentration of 2 μg/mL. Eight days after selection (set as T0), cells were harvested and a portion (i.e. 40 million cells which represents a 500X coverage of the library) was collected for genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction (Qiagen Gentra Puregene Cell Kit). The remaining cells were reseeded into 150 mm3 dish at 4 million cells per dish and treated with DMSO or G12Ci (ARS1620, 10μM). The medium was changed every three days. Cells were passaged at 80% confluence, and at least 500X coverage of the library was maintained at each passage. Fourteen days after treatment, cells were harvested and gDNA extracted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DT40 Cell Culture and Genomic DNA Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DT40 wild-type cell line stocks originally sourced from the Institute of Animal Health (now Pirbright Institute, UK) were obtained from the laboratory of Dr Julian E. Sale, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK. Cells were grown at 37° under 5% CO2 in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 7% fetal bovine serum, 3% chicken serum, 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol, and penicillin/streptomycin. Single cell clones were isolated and grown prior to sample preparation. Genomic DNA for both SNP array analysis and DNA sequencing was prepared using the Gentra Puregene Cell Kit (Qiagen). The sample preparation for the SNP array analysis took place previously, and the cell clones were frozen in 90% fetal bovine serum plus 10% DMSO, stored in liquid nitrogen, and re-thawed prior to the preparation of the DNA sequencing sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

DT40 Cell Mutant Analysis for DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following DT40 cell lines were used: wild-type Clone18,52 (link)BRCA1−/− and BRCA1+/− mutants,19 (link)BRCA2−/− and BRCA2+/− (originally termed BRCA2-/con1),20 (link)PCNAK164R/K164R (referred to in the text as PCNAK164R).33 (link) All gene mutations were authenticated using the whole-genome sequence data. Cells were grown at 37 °C under 5% CO2 in Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 medium supplemented with 7% fetal bovine serum and 3% chicken serum. MMS (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) or mock treatments were performed on one million cells for 1 h. Single cell clones were isolated and expanded to two million cells prior to genomic DNA preparation using the Gentra Puregene Cell Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). MMS sensitivity was measured by counting surviving cell colonies after plating treated cells in medium containing 1% methylcellulose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measuring Peripheral Blood Telomere Length

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBL genomic DNA was isolated in the UCSF cohort using the Gentra Puregene cell kit and in the UTSW cohort using Autopure LS (both from Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). MUC5B rs35705950 and TOLLIP rs5743890 SNPs were measured using the Taqman SNP Genotyping Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) independently at both institutions. PBL telomere length was measured for both cohorts at UTSW using quantitative PCR as previously described; samples were excluded for pre-specified DNA quality and concentration or sample volume criteria. 15 (link),20 ,30 (link) Telomere length was expressed as the natural logarithm-transformed ratio of the telomere to single gene copy (log T/S), the difference between the observed and expected for age, and the age-adjusted percentile.15 (link),20 ,30 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

CRISPR Screening of Head and Neck Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen #11965) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma), 1% NEAA (Invitrogen 15140122) and 7 μL/mL penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen 15140122) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C, as described [17 (link)]. Cells were tested for mycoplasma contamination using the MycoAlert detection kit (Lonza) and genotyped, as described [18 (link)]. UM-SCC lines were transduced with the Human Genome-wide CRISPR KnockOut (GeCKO) pooled library, version 2A which was a gift from Feng Zhang [15 (link)]. Conditions for transduction were established for a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 30%. After 7 days of puromycin selection, the cells were expanded and seeded per treatment. To preserve at least 300x coverage, 30 million cells were seeded per treatment for the GeCKO libraries. At the end of treatment, DNA was extracted from the remaining cells using Gentra Puregene Cell Kit (Qiagen), as described [19 (link)]. For cisplatin treatment, cells were dosed with 0.125 μM cisplatin (Selleckchem S1166) or DMSO (Sigma Aldrich) for 24 hours, once a week for two weeks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

DNA Extraction and Methylation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction from PNT1A and LNCaP cells and clinical samples was carried out using the Gentra Puregene Cell Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To evaluate the methylation pattern, 1 µg of genomic DNA was modified using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold kit (ZYMO RESEARCH, Irvine, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The modified DNA was stored at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!