The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ariamx real time pcr system

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States, Japan, United Kingdom, Germany, China, Belgium, France

The AriaMx Real-Time PCR System is a compact and flexible real-time PCR instrument designed for a variety of applications. It features a simple and intuitive user interface, and supports multiple detection formats including SYBR Green, TaqMan, and Multiplex assays.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

398 protocols using ariamx real time pcr system

1

Quantifying miR-92a-3p Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was used for reverse transcription in an AriaMx Real-time PCR System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using the TaqMan™ (Applied Biosystems; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Cat. # 4366596), TaqMan™ MicroRNA Assay hsa-miR-92a-3p RT-primers (Cat. # 4427975 Assay Id.000431) for reverse transcription of miR-92a-3p, and TaqMan™ MicroRNA Assay U6 RT-primers (Cat. # 4427975 Assay Id: 001973) for reverse transcription of the normalizer U6 RNA. Following this, 10 ng of cDNA was amplified by real-time qPCR in an AriaMx Real-time PCR System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using the TaqMan™ Universal Master Mix II kit (Cat. # 4440043) and corresponding miR-92a-3p or U6 qPCR primers and probes following the standard protocol. The expression of miR-92a-3p was calculated by normalizing against small nuclear RNA U6 using the ΔΔCt method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis in Colon Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from transfected SW480 and SW620 cells using RNAzol® RT (Sigma Aldrich, R4533) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Isolated RNA was resuspended in nuclease-free water and quantified using a BioTeK Synergy HT MultiDetection Microplate Reader™ (BioTek, USA). Following that step, RNA reverse transcription was performed in an AriaMx Real-time PCR System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using the 5x All-In-One RT MasterMix kit (Applied Biological Materials, Bellingham, WA, USA), and product cDNA was diluted into a final concentration of 20 ng/μL.
Afterward, 40 ng of cDNA was used for the analysis of target genes by real-time qPCR in an AriaMx Real-time PCR System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using the Brilliant II SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) following the standard manufacturer’s protocol. Amplification curves for each qPCR reaction were analyzed using the Agilent AriaMx Software 1.71, and the specificity of PCR products was controlled by analyzing the respective melting curves and temperatures. Relative expression of target genes was calculated by normalizing against the housekeeping gene pumilio RNA-binding family member 1 (PUM1) using the ΔΔCt method. Primer pair sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Enological Yeast by qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specific qPCR reactions were carried out to examine the presence and load of yeast of enological interest. The qPCR reactions were performed using an AriaMx real-time PCR System (Agilent Technologies) using primers and programs described in Table 2, for the following yeast: Saccharomyces, Hanseniaspora, Torulaspora, Metschnikowia, Rhodotorula, Debaryomyces, and Meyerozyma. Standard curves were built for each yeast species in triplicate using 10-fold serial dilutions of fresh cultures.
PCR amplification was performed in 10 μL of mix containing 1 μL of DNA 0.5 pmol/μL of each respective primer, 8 μL of LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche) and 1 μL of Milli-Q sterile H2O. All of the amplifications were carried out in optical-grade, 96-well plates, AriaMx real-time PCR System (Agilent Technologies). All samples were analyzed in triplicate. Yeast load were compared using grouped analysis performed with GraphPad Prism version 6.00 for Mac (GraphPad Software, La Jolla CA, USA3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PEG-GGT Treatment Impacts Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We treated CT26 cells with either PEG-GGT or left them untreated for 120 h in RPMI-1640 media in 24 well plates. We aspirated the media and lyzed the cells with RLT buffer. We extracted the RNA using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, #74104). We further treated the extracted RNA with DNAse treatment kit to remove genomic DNA (Invitrogen, #AM1906) and synthesized cDNA using cDNA reverse transcription kit (Invitrogen, #4368813). We performed RT-qPCR reaction using SsoFastTM EvaGreen Supermix with Low ROX (Bio-Rad, # 1725211) on AriaMx Real-time PCR System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). We normalized the results to Actin or GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3- phosphate dehydrogenase). To determine the fold change, we used the 2-ΔΔCt method by comparing PEG-GGT treated cells to non-treated controls. See Table S3 for the list of primer sequences used in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Real-Time PCR for Lung Sample Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Table 1: Primer sequences Amplification and detection was performed using AriaMx real-time PCR System (Agilent Technologies, USA) at the following cycling conditions: 1 cycle of 3 min at 95°C for the initial denaturation step and 40 cycles of 5 s at 95°C for the denaturation step, 20 s at 60°C for the annealing and extension step. Melting curve analysis was performed following the amplification. The generation of PCR product was tested using the ΔΔCT method and β-actin was taken as the endogenous control. All experiments were performed in triplicate independently and average C t value was calculated for the quantification analysis. The obtained results were correlated with the results of normal lung sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Phytoplasma Titer via qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phytoplasma titer was assessed by qPCR. The host-to-phytoplasma DNA ratio was determined using the AriaMx Real-Time PCR System, which utilized Brilliant SYBR Green QPCR Master Mix (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The 16S rRNA gene fragment from PPT phytoplasma DNA and tomato actin (internal control) fragment from the total DNAs were amplified using MPPLPPT16SF2/MPPLPPT16SR2 (Supplementary Table S1, [30 (link)]) as well as Sl-ACT-F/Sl-ACT-R primers, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). To determine the fold changes in phytoplasma titer, the expression levels were normalized to the internal control. A minimum of three independent biological samples were used. The following thermocycling conditions for qPCR operation were used: an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of amplification. Each cycle included denaturation at 95 °C for 5 s, annealing, and extension at 60 °C for 10 s. Statistical analysis was conducted using a Student’s t test in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA) to assess the significance of differences between groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Gene Expression Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The slices used for gene expression analysis were collected and processed with Allprotect tissue reagent (Qiagen, Manchester, UK) as per the manufacturer’s instruction. The RNA extraction was performed using an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Manchester, UK). To generate cDNA, 200 ng of RNA was used with the First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Oxford, UK) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Each sample was diluted 1:20 with RNAse-free water. Polymerase chain reaction was performed using SYBR green (ThermoFisher Scientific, Oxford, UK) in a 10 μL real-time PCR reaction. The following PCR conditions were used for all experiments: denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, then at 60 °C for 60 s. All primers were designed on Primer Express v3.0 and are available in Supplementary Table S1. Reactions were duplicated for each sample and quantified in the AriaMx Real-time PCR System (Agilent, Stockport, UK). Data were expressed as arbitrary units, and the relative expression of target genes (FASN, SCD1, HMGCR, ELOVL6) was corrected to the geometric average of two housekeeping genes (determined using BestKeeper tool, BK): 18S, GADPH. Fold change across conditions was calculated by dividing the relative expression value of each gene by the geometric mean relative expression value from the control samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A TRIzol kit (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to purify the RNA from the tissue or cells. ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT Kit (Toyobo Life Science) was used at 42°C for 18 min and 98°C 5 min for the reverse transcription of RNA to cDNA. The primers were designed and synthesized by General Biotech Co., Ltd. RT-qPCR was performed using the KAPA SYBR Green SuperMix PCR kit (Kapa Biosystems; Roche Diagnostics) and the AriaMx Real-Time PCR System (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 3 min, 95°C for 10 sec and 60°C for 30 sec, for 40 cycles. Differences in gene expression were calculated using the relative standard curve and comparative threshold cycle method (2−ΔΔCq) (13 (link)), and RT-qPCR was used to verify the expression of GAPDH. The following primers were used: GAPDH forward, 5′-GCAAGTTCAACGGCACAGTCA-3′ and reverse, 5′-ACGACATACTCAGCACCAGCAT-3′; and ISG15 forward, 5′-ACAGCCATGGGCTGGGA-3′ and reverse, 5′-GTTCGTCGCATTTGTCCACC-3′.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Bacteria and O. oeni via qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both total bacteria and load of O. oeni were quantified by qPCR reactions based on detection of SYBR fluorescence. The qPCR reactions were performed using an AriaMx real-time PCR System (Agilent Technologies), using primers and programs described in Table 1. PCR amplification was performed in 10 μL of mix containing 1 μL of DNA 0.5 pmol/mL of each respective primer 5 μL of LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche) and 3.5 μL of Milli-Q sterile H2O. All samples were analyzed in triplicate. The statistical analyses among bacterial loads valleys were determined by ANOVA using R Development Core Team (2008 ), and the post-hoc test was performed by pairwise.t.test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pituitary Gene Expression in Medaka

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Female medaka of esr2a+/− and esr2a−/− (age: three to four months) were deeply anesthetized and their pituitaries were collected for qRT-PCR.
Total RNA was extracted from the pituitaries using the NucleoSpin RNA plus (TaKaRa, Kusatsu, Japan) according to the manufacture’s instruction. Total RNA samples were then reverse transcribed by PrimeScriptTM RT Master Mix (TaKaRa). For qRT-PCR, the cDNA was amplified by KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR kit (Nippon Genetics, Tokyo, Japan) with AriaMX Realtime PCR System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The temperature profile of the reaction was 95 °C for 3 minutes, 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 seconds, annealing at 60 °C for 10 seconds, and extension at 72 °C for 10 seconds. The PCR products were verified using melting curve analysis. The data were normalized by a housekeeping gene, ribosomal protein s13 (rps13). The melting curve analyses were conducted to ensure that the amplicons were the same as the sequence-certified ones. The primer pairs used in the real-time PCR are listed in the primer list (Supplementary Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!