The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

364 protocols using spss for windows version 26

1

Predicting Prognosis of Alcohol Consumption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed by SPSS for Windows version 26.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and R version 4.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to confirm normal distributions of continuous data. Independent t-tests were used for normally distributed data. Counting data were examined by using the chi-square test. Univariate Cox proportional hazards models were performed for all potential baseline predictors to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Variables that were significant in univariate analysis (P < 0.05) and those with known prognostic values were selected to build multivariate Cox proportional models with a stepwise forward selection of variables. A nomogram was generated to indicate the interrelationships between the variables in the prediction model and the extent to which alcohol consumption affects prognosis. Then, the C-index and calibration curves were adopted to verify the predictive accuracy of the scoring system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Integrated Workflow for Metabolic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Figure 1 depicted the integrated workflow of our research. All analyses were conducted by IBM Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) for Windows, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., United States), R software, version 4.2.2 and MetaboAnalyst 5.0 Web Server.1 The networks were visualized by Cytoscape version 3.9.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Validation of a Research Assessment Tool

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Study data were analyzed using the “IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS©) for Windows version 26.0”. The numbers, percentages, means, and standard deviations were calculated during the descriptive analysis. The Shapiro–Wilk test and Skewness and Kurtosis test were used to analyze normality. The content validity index was calculated using the Davis method. The Wilcoxon test and interclass correlation calculations were used for the test-retest comparison during the pilot study. Cronbach’s α coefficient and the item total correlation were calculated during the reliability analysis. The reliability of the measurement model was also tested using the average explained variance (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) values for each factor separately. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) coefficient test, Bartlett significance test, and explanatory factor analysis (EFA) were used to evaluate the validity of the assessment tool. Statistical significance was considered when p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Adherence to 24-Hour Movement Guidelines and Mental Health

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MANCOVA was conducted to examine the associations between combinations of the 24-hour movement guidelines with depression and anxiety. According to participants’ adherence to the 24-hour movement guidelines, they were classified into eight mutually exclusive groups: None, Sleep only, SB only, MVPA only, Sleep + SB, Sleep + MVPA, SB + MVPA, and All three. Pairwise post hoc comparisons (Bonferroni test) were then performed to examine the differences of depression and anxiety levels across these eight groups after adjusting for socio-demographic variables. MANCOVA was performed in SPSS for Windows, version 26.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (two-tailed) for interpreting the results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Baseline Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical data are presented as proportions, normally distributed continuous data as mean values, and continuous data with a skewed distributed as median (i.q.r.). Normality of distribution was checked by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Mann–Whitney U, χ2 and Fisher’s exact test were used as appropriate to compare baseline characteristics. Statistical significance was set at two-sided P < 0.050. Data were analysed using SPSS® for Windows® version 26.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

COVID-19 Lockdown Effects on Substance Use

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All variables in the analysis were categorical except for age, which we
considered a normally distributed continuous variable after examining its
distribution. We reported descriptive statistics for demographic and substance
use variables for the overall survey sample and for pre–COVID-19 lockdown and
post–COVID-19 lockdown participants. We used t tests and
Pearson χ2 analyses to identify crude effects between pre–COVID-19
lockdown and post–COVID-19 lockdown survey participants. We used logistic
regression models that adjusted for all covariates to identify the adjusted main
effects of COVID-19 lockdown on substance use and perceived substance use
availability. We used pre–COVID-19 lockdown implementation, heterosexual
cisgender males, middle school, and rural towns as the reference groups. We
interpreted odds ratios (ORs) as the change in odds of using a psychoactive
substance and the change in odds of finding it somewhat or very difficult to
obtain a psychoactive substance after implementation of the COVID-19 lockdown.
We used SPSS for Windows version 26.0 (IBM Corporation) for statistical
analyses. We determined significance using 95% CIs at the α = .05 level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Predictive Factors for Postoperative CRRT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed with the SPSS for Windows version 26.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Categorical variables were expressed as number and percentage and were analyzed using the chi-square or Fisher exact test as appropriate. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (or median and range) and compared with 2-tailed Student’s t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests, as appropriate. Normality was assessed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
A forward multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictive factors for receiving postoperative CRRT and 30-day mortality in patients with CRRT. This model included risk factors that were first identified by univariate analysis (p < 0.2). Hosmer and Lemeshow tests and −2 log likelihood provided an evaluation of the logistic regression model.
Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was determined to estimate the accuracy of using variables of intent to predict the require for postoperative CRRT. The optimal cutoff value was assessed by You-den’s index (J = Sensitivity + Specificity – 1). All analyses were two-sided, and p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Exploring Functional Movement Scores and Injury Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microsoft Excel 2019 and IBM SPSS for Windows version 26.0 software were used for record storage and all data analyses. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to perform normality analysis. The Mann-Whitney U test, a nonparametric approach, was used to compare differences of the FMS scores in the injured and non-injured. To differentiate between injured and non-injured students by exploring the optimal cut-off point for FMS scores, the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The optimal cut-off value is captured by identifying the point with the highest Youden index (J). Correlations of composite score, sports injuries, PA, and SP were analyzed using Spearman's rank coefficients and Binary logistic regression. The predictive accuracy was calculated based on identifying the population with sports injuries. Correlations visualization was carried out based on Python 3.9 and R 4.2 language. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05 for all tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Surgery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 26.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY, USA). Measurement data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. For between-group comparisons, normally distributed variables were assessed using an independent sample t test. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the change in radiographic parameters from preoperatively to postoperatively. The VAS and ODI scores in each group at different time points were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the count data. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, and all P values were 2-tailed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Retrospective Analysis of Patient Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were retrospectively collected from our medical system (e-MedSolution) and personal patient documentation. Personal patient data were also collected. Descriptive statistics were performed using R statistical software, version 4.2.2 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria), and SPSS for Windows, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and as the count and percentage for categorical variables.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!