The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bnt162b2

Manufactured by Moderna
Sourced in United States

BNT162b2 is a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine candidate developed by Moderna. It is designed to induce an immune response against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using bnt162b2

1

COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Breakthrough Infections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For uptake, our outcomes were dates of administration of available COVID-19 vaccinations as part of the primary-two-dose vaccination schedule and the subsequent 2021 booster vaccination. Vaccinations available were Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), Moderna (mRNA-1273) and Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19).
For vaccine breakthrough infections, our outcomes were dates of COVID-19 infections as determined by a positive COVID-19 RT-PCR test. A new infection was defined at the date of a positive test with at least 90 since the previous positive test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Response in Immunosuppressed

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Upon recruitment to the study, patients were defined as rituximab-exposed, immunosuppression-exposed, or non-immunosuppressed based on their treatment history. The rituximab-exposed group included individuals receiving rituximab within the previous 6 months and/or having persistent B cell count < 10 cells/µL. The ‘Other’ immunosuppression-exposed group included individuals exposed to any of the following: cyclophosphamide within the previous 3 months, current azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or methotrexate use, and/or current use of prednisolone (or equivalent) ≥ 10 mg daily. Those not currently receiving immunosuppression or receiving < 10 mg prednisolone daily were classed as not exposed to immunosuppression. We categorised SARS-CoV-2 vaccines into either mRNA vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech [BNT162b2] or Moderna [CX-024414]) or adenovirus-based vaccine (AstraZeneca [AZD1222]).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Longitudinal COVID-19 Vaccine Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
61 individuals (45 SARS-CoV-2 naïve, 16 SARS-CoV-2 recovered) were consented and enrolled in the longitudinal vaccine study with approval from the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board (IRB# 844642). All participants were otherwise healthy and based on self-reported health screening did not have any history of chronic health conditions. Subjects were stratified based on self-reported and laboratory evidence of a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. All subjects received either Pfizer (BNT162b2) or Moderna (mRNA-1273) mRNA vaccines. Samples were collected at 10 timepoints: baseline, 2 weeks post-1st dose, day of 2nd dose, 1 week post-2nd dose, 3 months post-primary immunization, 6 months post-primary immunization, 9–10 months post-primary immunization, pre 3rd dose, 2 weeks post 3rd dose, and 3 months post 3rd dose. 80–100mL of peripheral blood samples and clinical questionnaire data were collected at each study visit. Full cohort and demographic information is provided in table S1. Healthy donor PBMC samples were collected with approval from the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board (IRB# 845061)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

COVID-19 Vaccine Response in Convalescent Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
COVID-19 convalescent patients were defined as study participants who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by nasal swab PCR test in the past. All the COVID-19 convalescent patients in this study had received 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. The term vaccine recipient refers to participants who had never tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and had received 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. All study participants worked in health care and/or laboratory settings; 33 participants received the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine, and 5 participants received the Moderna (mRNA-1273) vaccine. Of all participants, 21 were between the ages of 21 and 30 years, 7 were between the ages of 31 and 40 years, 8 were between the ages of 41 and 50 years, and 2 were between the ages of 51 and 60 years. Blood was drawn and processed between June and August 2021. Further details for participants who responded to the S812-829 epitope are in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunosuppressive Therapy and mRNA Vaccine Protocols for Kidney Transplant Recipients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry and Luminex-based single-antigen bead assay were used to select the immunosuppressive therapy protocol27 (link). Basic immunosuppression included the use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), MMF, steroids, and anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody basiliximab. Low-dose rituximab (100 mg/m2 or 100 mg/body) was administered in recipients who had donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies. ABO blood-type incompatible KT recipients received basic immunosuppressive agents, rituximab, low-dose rituximab (100 mg/m2 or 100 mg/body), and therapeutic apheresis. Those with a viral infection or malignancies were switched from CNIs or MMF to everolimus. Page 8 line 225.
The mRNA vaccine was administered as a mass or individual vaccination; the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 was used for the first and second doses (0.03 mg/0.3 mL, deltoid muscle injection), and Moderna mRNA-1273 was also used from the third dose (0.05 mg/0.25 mL, deltoid muscle injection), but mostly Pfizer was used more frequently. The first dose was started on February 17, 2021; the second dose was given 3 weeks apart, starting on March 10, 2021; the third dose began on December 1, 2021. The third vaccination was recommended 6–8 months after the second dose by government policy due to vaccine shortages and preparation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Humoral Immune Response to mRNA Vaccines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Between June 2020–April 2021, 102 individuals 18 years of age or older (70 COVID-19-naïve, 32 COVID-19-experienced) gave written informed consent to participate in this prospective study, which was approved by the Loyola University Chicago Institutional Review Board (IRB# 213447032320 and 214521021621). Subjects were defined as COVID-19-naïve or COVID-19-experienced based on three criteria: self-reported history of a SARS-CoV-2-positive test, pre-existing antibodies against spike, and/or pre-existing antibodies against nucleocapsid. All subjects received either Pfizer (BNT162b2) or Moderna (mRNA-1273) mRNA vaccines. Peripheral venous blood and demographic/clinical questionnaire data were collected at three study visits: baseline (PV), 3 weeks post-initial vaccine dose (V1), and 3 weeks after the second vaccine (V2). Cohort demographics are provided in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Cancer Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CACOV-VAC study (NCT04836793) was a monocentric prospective study, including cancer patients with active treatment in the adjuvant or metastatic setting, patients in surveillance, and healthy donors. The cut-off age of 70 years was chosen according to the ESMO-SIOG definition as the most commonly used cut-off for defining patients as elderly within the field of geriatric oncology (25 ). Men or women ≥ 18 years of age were eligible for inclusion if they had been eligible for the vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with mRNA vaccine (Pfizer: BNT162b2; Moderna: mRNA-1273) and did not develop a symptomatic form of COVID-19 within the last 3 months before inclusion. Major exclusion criteria included the reception of a live, attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks before the initiation of treatment or if this vaccination will be required during the study. Here, we report the results of an ancillary study of the CACOV-VAC trial.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Longitudinal Immune Responses to mRNA Vaccines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
47 individuals (36 SARS-CoV-2 naive, 11 SARS-CoV-2 recovered) provided informed consent and were enrolled in the study with approval from the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board (IRB# 844642). All participants were otherwise healthy and did not report any history of chronic health conditions. Subjects were identified as SARS-CoV-2 naive or recovered via combined self-reporting and laboratory evidence of a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. All subjects received either Pfizer (BNT162b2) or Moderna (mRNA-1273) mRNA vaccines and were enrolled irrespective of which mRNA vaccine they received. Samples were collected at 4 time points: pre-vaccine baseline (time point 1), two weeks post-primary vaccination (time point 2), the day of the booster vaccination (time point 3), and one week post-boost (time point 4). Each study visit included collection of clinical questionnaire data and 80-100mL of peripheral blood. Full cohort and demographic information is provided in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Neutralizing Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum samples were collected from nine donors with two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and another group of nine donors with three doses of vaccines, including BNT162b2 or mRNAQ-123 (Moderna) (Table 1). The serum samples were heat inactivated at 56°C for 30 min and stored at −80°C until use. To compare the neutralizing activity against different spike-pseudotyped lentiviruses, 2-fold serially diluted sera were mixed with an equal volume of pseudoviruses (5 ng of p24 level per well) and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Finally, 2.2 × 104 293T cells transiently expressing ACE2 and TMPRSS2 were added into each well in a 96-well plate and incubated further for 48 h prior to quantification of luciferase expression using a One-Glo luciferase assay system in Centro XS3 LB960 luminometer (Berthold Technologies). The neutralization level was determined by the percent decrease in luminescence relative to that obtained in the absence of sera. Neutralization curves were plotted, and 50% pseudovirus neutralization titer (pNT50) values (in serum dilution factor) were inferred using GraphPad Prism, and expressed in percentage normalized to parental WT D614G or BA.2. Prepandemic sera isolated from three donors were simultaneously tested and always yielded negative results for neutralization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Breakthrough Infections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We studied second doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech),19 (link) ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca),20 (link) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna)12 (link) vaccines, and third or booster doses of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273. Vaccination status was defined on the date of the positive RT-PCR (symptom date for test-negative design) test and coded using the following categories: unvaccinated; 1–27 days after first dose; 28 days or more after first dose; 0–13 days after second dose; 14–41 days after second dose; 42–69 days after second dose; and 10 weeks or more (≥70 days) after second dose. For those with a third or booster dose, the categories were 0 or 1 week after booster dose or 2 or more weeks after booster dose.
Vaccinated groups were stratified by time intervals since second and third doses of vaccine and whether infection was caused by delta (S-gene positive) or omicron (S-gene negative). The S-gene variable took one of five values, as follows: S-positive (delta), weak S-positive (usually also delta), S-negative (omicron), other, and unknown. Unknown corresponded to individuals who were tested in NHS laboratories (where S-gene status was unavailable) or who were tested in the Lighthouse laboratory, but the sample did not yield any cycle threshold values. Other corresponded to cycle threshold values that could not otherwise be classified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!