The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

22 protocols using architect sars cov 2 igg

1

SARS-CoV-2 Serology Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study included 77 serum/plasma samples from 40 individuals tested positive and four samples from four individuals tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal swab samples. The positive samples were taken at 8 to 81 days after onset of symptoms. Additionally, 48 serum samples from asymptomatic individuals with a comprehensively negative SARS-CoV-2 serology (Euroimmun IgG (EUROIMMUN Ag, Lübeck, Germany), IFA IgG virus, IFA IgG spike, microneutralization negative) and 27 seropositive samples (Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 ELISA (IgG), Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) and microneutralization positive) were included. The data and samples were collected under research permit HUS/211/2020 and ethics committee approval HUS/853/2020 (Helsinki University Hospital, Finland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

COVID-19 Diagnostic Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
COVID-19 RT-PCR were performed using Cobas SARS-CoV 2 Test by Roche Diagnostics (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ, USA). From the COVID-19 PCR positive patients, a subset underwent antibody testing for COVID-19 IgG antibodies, and testing was performed using the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA) which detects anti-nucleocapsid protein [13 ]. These and other diagnostics tests had regular and routine quality control as expected within an accredited pathology network.
The institutional review board including an ethics and scientific committee approval was obtained to analyse the data anonymously (Abu Dhabi Department of Health’s COVID-19 Research Ethics Committee (CVDC-20-05/2020-8, https://www.doh.gov.ae/en/covid-19/Research%20Registry). The informed consent for the study was waived by the committee due to the retrospective nature of the study and that COVID swabs or antibody testing was considered part of routine care.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Assessing Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We assessed anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using two tests. Serum samples were tested using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG on the Abbott ARCHITECT i2000sr platform (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, USA) that detects immunoglobulin class G (IgG) antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 (cutoff for positivity 1.4). In addition to that blood samples were also tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using CoronaPass total antibodies test (Genetico, Moscow, Russia) that detects total antibodies (cutoff for positivity 1.0) and is based on recombinant receptor binding domain of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 (Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA). We simultaneously report seroprevalence based on CMIA and ELISA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 IgG Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We assessed SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in all samples using three commercially available assays.
First, chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) technology for the quantitative determination of anti-S1 and anti-S2 specific IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 was used: Diasorin LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG Assay. Antibody levels > 15.0 AU/mL were considered positive and levels between 12.0 and 15.0 AU/mL were considered equivocal.
Second, an ELISA detecting IgG against the S1 domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA, was used; a ratio < 0.8 was considered negative, 0.8–1.1 equivocal, > 1.1 positive.
Third, chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) intended for the qualitative detection of IgG antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2, Abbott Diagnostics ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG, was used. This assay relies on an assay-specific calibrator to report a ratio of specimen absorbance to calibrator absorbance. The interpretation of result is determined by an index (S/C) value, which is a ratio over the threshold value. An index (S/C) of < 1.4 was considered negative, ≥ 1.4 was considered positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IgG antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein (N) of SARS-CoV2 were detected using Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbott Diagnostics, Sydney, NSW Australia) as previously described.23
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were collected once. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed using the Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgG II Quant assay (Abbott-NP, Abbott, Chicago, IL) were used to detect antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 [14 (link)–16 (link)]. The cutoff value for a positive IgG response was anti-Spike S1 protein IgG (Anti-S) < 50.0 AU/mL and anti-nucleocapsid IgG index (Anti-N) ≥ 1.4 according to the instructions of the manufacturer [14 (link)–16 (link)]. We have proceeded to convert the antibody titer measurements from arbitrary units per milliliter (AU/mL) to WHO’s standard BAU/mL, with BAU/mL being calculated as 0.142 times AU/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Assessing Antibody Testing Accuracy for COVID-19

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Based on the results of antibody testing conducted in the Tokyo metropolitan area [12 ], the antibody-positive rate was predicted to be ≤1%. Therefore, it is important to use highly specific antibodies to reduce the false-positive rate [13 (link)]. In a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of antibody tests, the specificity of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and chemiluminescent immunoassay was reported to be high [14 (link)]; therefore, we used Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics), a chemiluminescent immunoassay. According to the manufacturer, the antibody test has a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.1–100%) and specificity of 99.81% (95% CI: 99.65–99.91%) [15 ].
To confirm the sensitivity, patients who were admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 confirmed using a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test result were tested for antibodies (both Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 and Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG [Abbott Laboratories Inc.]). All 10 patients with COVID-19 tested positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies on both tests.
Additionally, the samples collected in May 2020 were tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG using Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG [16 (link)] to check the consistency of the results. Any positive antibody results were confirmed using the Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG Assay and Cica Immuno-test SARS-CoV-2 IgG [17 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Serological Assays for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum samples were analysed using two commercial serological assays: Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG, DiaSorin Liaison SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG.
The qualitative detection of anti-N IgG was performed using a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (Abbott ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG). A signal/cut-off ratio of ≥1.4 was interpreted as reactive according to the manufacturer’s instructions.11 Studies report that clinical sensitivity is time-dependent and after day 14 it ranges between 84.2% and 100% whereas specificity results 99.6%–100%.12 13 (link) Prior to analyses of patient samples, calibration was performed and negative quality control signal/cut-off ratio ≤0.78 and positive quality control signal/cut-off ratio 1.65–8.40 were achieved.
The quantitative detection of anti-S IgG was evaluated using a standardised automated chemiluminescent assay (DiaSorin S.p.A., Saluggia, Italy). A detection of ≥12 AU/mL was interpreted as positive according to the manufacturer’s instructions.14 The test’s sensitivity is time-dependent, that is 25% in the first 5 days after RT-PCR-confirmed diagnosis, 90% from day 5 to day 15, and 97% from day 15 forward.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following commercial CE in vitro diagnostics (IVD) marked assays were used to determine the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in serum specimens: Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG (6R86, Abbott, Illinois, USA) detecting anti-nucleocapsid antibodies and Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA IgG (EI 2606–9601 G, EuroImmun, Lübeck, Germany) recognizing antibodies against the S1 domain of viral spike protein. Assays were performed in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions by trained laboratory staff on appropriate analyzers and with the specified controls and calibrants, using thresholds for calling positives, indeterminates and negatives set by the manufacturers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to exclude patients with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, a qualitative chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay was used for the qualitative detection of IgG antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (Architect SARS-CoV-2-IgG, Abbott GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany).
A quantitative analysis of IgG antibodies directed against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was performed by chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) (Architect SARS-CoV-2-IgG II Quant, Abbott GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany). Vaccine response was considered to be present at a titer of >50 AU/mL (the threshold specified by the manufacturer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!