The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using leica mzfliii microscope

1

Assessing Dysplastic Vessels in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using casting technique, we assessed whether dysplastic vessels in mice resemble the AVM nidus in humans. We explored the cerebrovasculature with Microfil cast (Flow Tech, Inc. Carver, MA) 8 weeks after vector injection, as previously described [21 (link)]. Briefly, mice were anesthetized using isoflurane inhalation, perfused with 37°C PBS plus heparin (5 unit/ml) through the left ventricle of the heart to wash out blood from the circulation using a Masterflex Pump Controller (Cole Parmer Instrument, Chicago, IL) at 4 ml/min, followed by perfusion with Microfil. This flow rate generated a pressure approximate to murine physiological blood pressure [22 (link)]. Brain samples were collected and fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at 4°C, then clarified using an alcohol-methyl salicylate clearing sequence according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Vasculature was imaged under a dissecting microscope (Leica MZFL III microscope, Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Stomata and Vascular Tissue Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ear-leaves were sampled from the muw and wild-type plants at the filling stage for measuring stomata number. The lower epidermis of the leaf was peeled off using tweezers and placed onto a microscope slide according to the description of Muir et al. (2014) (link). Stomata were counted from five microscopic fields of the middle zone of the leaf. The stomata number per unit area of the muw and wild-type leaves was compared.
Stem internodes from the muw and wild-type plants were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma) overnight. The fixed tissue samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol (30, 50, 70, 85, 95, and 100% ethanol), embedded in Paraplast Plus (Sigma), then sectioned into 8-µm slices using a Leica RM2265 microtome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Hesse-Darmstadt, Germany). The slices were stained using 0.5% toluidine blue and subsequently photographed using a Leica MZFLIII microscope (Leica Microsystems). The vascular bundles and vessels in the largest vascular bundle were counted from the photographed images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Larval Imaging and Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A subsample of larvae from each diet or exposure group was randomly selected, anaesthetized with MS222 (Tricaine, CAS: 888-86-2, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA and transferred to 3% methylcellulose. Images of larvae were taken at 0.8× magnification using a Leica MZ FLIII microscope (Leica Microsystems BV, Rijswijk, The Netherlands) with a mounted camera and LAS software (LAS Software V3.6, Leica Microsystems BV, Rijswijk, The Netherlands). A picture was taken of a calibration slide with 10 mm long bar with the same magnification. Image J software was used the measure the standard length of larvae from mouth to the caudal peduncle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Seed Sectioning and Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seeds at 15 days after flowering (DAF) were collected and fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma, Santa Clara, CA, USA), then dehydrated in an ethanol gradient series (30, 50, 70, 85, 95, and 100% ethanol), and embedded in Paraplast Plus (Sigma, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The sample blocks were sectioned into 8-μm slices using a Leica RM2265 microtome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Hesse-Darmstadt, Germany) and stained with 0.5% toluidine blue. Images were captured using a Leica MZFLIII microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Hesse-Darmstadt, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microscopic Analysis of Maize Kernel Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kernels at 6, 12, and 21 DAP were harvested from the selfed +/Zmsmk3 heterozygotes and fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), dehydrated in an ethanol gradient series (30%, 50%, 70%, 85%, 95%, and 100% ethanol), and embedded in Paraplast Plus (Sigma-Aldrich). The samples were sectioned into 8–12 µm slices using a Leica RM2265 microtome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and stained with 0.5% toluidine blue O. Images were captured using a Leica MZFLIII microscope (Leica Microsystems).
For the TEM analysis, the 10-DAP endosperms of the WT and Zmsmk3 kernels were fixed, washed, dehydrated, embedded, and cut into ultrathin sections, as previously described (Ren et al. 2017 (link)). Ultra-thin sections were obtained using a Leica EM UC7 ultra microtome (Leica Microsystems). The sections were stained with uranyl acetate and subsequently with lead citrate, then imaged using a Tecnai G2 20 TWIN transmission electron microscope. These procedures were performed by Pei Zhang (Core Facility and Technical Support, Wuhan Institute of Virology, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Zebrafish Motor Neuron and Touch-Evoked Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 25 hpf, 10 zebrafish embryos per Petri dish (n = 30 per experimental condition) were randomly selected. The number of complete body contractions each zebrafish made in 30 second period was counted and was used as indicative of motor neuron activity [27] (link). Representative videos of each experimental condition were taken using Leica Application Suite (Leica Microsystems Ltd) and a Leica MZFLIII microscope (Leica Microsystems Ltd) equipped with a DFC450C camera (Leica Microsystems Ltd).
For the analysis of the touch-evoked escape behaviour, 10 zebrafish larvae per Petri dish (n = 30 per experimental condition) were randomly selected. Touch-evoked escape behaviours were elicited by touching a larva in the tail up to 6 times with a pair of forceps at 5 dpf. Three categories were distinguished, responders, late responders and non-responders, to which the following scores were given: 3 points for responders: fish quickly react (swimming or flicking the tail) to the stimuli after 1 or 2 twitches; 2 points for late responders: fish react (swimming or flicking the tail) to the stimuli after 3, 4 or 5 twitches; and 1 point for non-responders: fish do not react to the stimuli after more than 5 twitches. Representative videos were recorded with the system described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microscopy Techniques for Imaging Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-mount images were taken using a Leica MZFLIII microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) fitted with a QImaging MicroPublisher 5.0 RTV camera and QCapture Pro 6.0 software (QImaging, Surrey, BC, Canada); a Zeiss AxioSkop2 microscope fitted with a Zeiss AxioCam HRc camera and Zeiss AxioVision Rel. 4.8 software (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany); an Olympus MVX10 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) fitted with a Zeiss AxioCam HRc camera and Zeiss AxioVision Rel. 4.8 software; an Olympus 1 × 71 inverted microscope fitted with a Hamamatsu ORCA-R2 monochrome camera and HCImage software (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan); a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope with Zeiss ZEN software; and a Zeiss 710 confocal microscope with Zeiss LSM Image Browser (version 4.2.0.121) software, which was used to create three-dimensional images and stack movies. Images of sections were taken using a Zeiss AxioSkop 2 MOT microscope fitted with a QImaging Retiga 2000R camera, a Qimaging RGB pancake and QCapture Pro 6.0 software; a Zeiss Scope.A1 microscope fitted with a Zeiss AxioCam MRm camera and Zeiss ZEN 2012 (blue edition) software; and a Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope with Zeiss ZEN 2011 (black edition) software. All images were further processed in Photoshop CS4 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA) and/or ImageJ 1.50i software (NIH, Bethesda, MD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!