The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Miseqdx

Manufactured by Illumina
Sourced in United States

The MiSeqDx is a compact, next-generation sequencing (NGS) instrument designed for clinical diagnostic use. It is capable of performing targeted sequencing of DNA and RNA samples. The MiSeqDx generates high-quality sequencing data and provides a streamlined workflow for generating sequencing results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

32 protocols using miseqdx

1

MiSeq Sequencing and Fusion Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Libraries were sequenced on a MiSeq or MiSeqDx sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Libraries were diluted to 4 nM and equal amounts of up to 16 libraries were pooled per run. Library pools were diluted to 16 pM library stock with 10% 12.5 pM PhiX and loaded in the MiSeq cartridge. Analysis of sequencing results was performed using the Archer Analysis software (v3.2.1; ArcherDX Inc.). Fusion parameters were set to a minimum of 5 valid fusion reads with a minimum of 3 unique start sites within the valid fusion reads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

EGFR Targeted Therapy Response Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The patient underwent treatment with EGFR targeted therapies based on the treating oncologist’s recommendations. The patient’s response to therapy was monitored by CT or MRI and clinical examinations as per standard practice. Response assessment was determined by the treating clinician. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections were prepared from tumor biopsies for histological assessment and genetic testing at various time points. For the pre-treatment biopsy, the sequencing performed was a targeted NGS Illumina MiSeqDx platform, and the liver biopsy at progression was analyzed using Foundation One CDx sequencing. The case report was included with written informed consent from the patient, approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB #2055–13) at Lifespan Cancer Institute at the Rhode Island Hospital and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Molecular Profiling of Lung Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both cytology (brushing and catheter rinse) and histology (biopsies) samples were used for morphological diagnosis. Molecular testing was performed after DNA extraction from sections cut from cell (cytology) or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (tissue) blocks, and included a first screening of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) common mutations by the Cobas® technique (Kit ROCHE Cobas DNA Sample Preparation Kit), immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ROS1 (Clone D4D6; Ozyme, Saint-Cyr-l'École, France) and ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase, Clone 1A4; Diagomics, Blagnac, France) rearrangements followed by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) if positive (IQFISH break-apart probe, Dako Omnis, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA)), and in a second time, a hybrid capture NGS, covering a 48-genes panel (Roche Sequencing (Kapa/SeqCap), Roche, Bale, Switzerland; MiSeq DX, Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). PD-L1 expression was assessed on biopsies and surgically resected specimens using IHC (Clone QR1, Quartett, Diagomics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genome Sequencing and Annotation of Aeromonas Phages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA sequencing libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra DNA library prep kit. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq Dx instrument using RUO (research use only) mode, using the v2 500-cycle sequencing chemistry. Illumina read quality was assessed using FastQC v0.11.7; de novo assembly was performed using CLC Genomics Workbench v12.0.3, with resulting average depth of read coverage 925x for AhMtk13a and 518x for AhMtk13b. Assembled phage genome was annotated manually using the Artemis annotation tool [72 (link)]. The putative open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted by using GenemarkS [73 (link)]. Putative functions of the ORFs were analyzed by BLASTP search and Pfam [74 (link)], and HMMER online software [75 (link)]. Prediction of tRNAs was done by using tRNAscan-SE 1.3.1 software [76 ]. Geneious software was used for multiple alignments and mapping [77 (link)]. Phage taxonomy was determined by using BLASTn results and was visualized by VIPtree [24 (link),78 (link)]. Genome sequence identity was calculated by ANI Calculator based on the OrthoANIu algorithm [79 (link)]. Phylogenetic tree was constructed by MegaX with 500 bootstrap (neighbor-joining tree) [80 (link)]. GenBank accession number for our nucleotide sequence: BankIt2526887 Aeromonas OL840900 for Phage AhMtk13a; BankIt2529090 Aeromonas OL840901 for Phage AhMtk13b.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders and Aneuploidy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blastocyst trophectoderm cells were amplified using the REPLI‐g Single Cell Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. PGT‐M was conducted to test for mutated sites and linked SNPs, and Peking Jabrehoo Med Tech was used for haplotype construction. The pathogenic variants/SNPs of the target genes were amplified, followed by Sanger sequencing (Figure S1). The genotypes of the embryos were determined based on the results of pathogenic variant and haplotype analysis (Harton et al., 2011 (link)).
PGT for aneuploidy (PGT‐A) was performed with NGS‐based CNV sequencing on the Illumina MiSeqDx platform, which indicated >4 Mb CNV and 30%–70% mosaicism.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lymphoma Mutation Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After DNA extraction of 51 available FL FFPE (n=33 from training cohort and n=18 from validation cohort), samples were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeqDx using our lymphopanel of 43 genes involved in B-cell lymphomagenesis.17 (link) Sequencing and data analysis was performed as previously described17 (link),18 (link) (see details in the Online Supplemental Methods).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Illumina MiSeq Library Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the final step, each library was diluted to 10 nM in Low TE, and then all libraries were pooled at 10 nM and diluted to 4 nM. Finally, the pooled libraries were denatured and diluted at 12 pM and loaded on a MiSeq Reagent Nano Kit v2 (300-cycles) cartridge with 12.5 pM PhiX (1.5%) sequencing control V3 (Illumina). Libraries were then sequenced on Illumina MiseqDX (Illumina) instrumentation in RUO mode. The whole process also required the use of a Veriti 96 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystem) for the amplification of the libraries and the Dynamag-96 side (Invitrogen) for the clean-up of the libraries.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Haemophilia Carrier Identification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gold standard for the identification of a female as a haemophilia carrier was genetic testing. Inversion testing, DNA sequencing and the gene dosage assay were subsequently carried out until the detection of the pathogenic mutations. Long-distance PCR or inverse-shifting PCR according to the research of Rossetti et al. was utilized for inversion tests [12 ,13 (link)]. Sanger sequencing with ABI 3130 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) or next-generation sequencing using MiSeqDx® (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was performed for DNA sequencing. Multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification was applied for the gene dosage assay. As for females who had wanted to undergo carrier testing, we carried out targeted gene mutation analysis for the same pathogenic mutation as their own probands. We classified the pathogenic mutations into null (inversion, nonsense, and frameshift) and non-null mutations (missense and splicing).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

BRCA1/2 Mutation Screening by NGS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Germline or somatic mutations of BRCA1/2 were tested by Sanger sequencing or by next generation sequencing (NGS). Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood of participants using a Chemagic DNA Blood 200 Kit (Chemagen, Baesweiler, Germany) or a QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Amplified PCR products were sequenced on an ABI 3500xl analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit. Sequences were analyzed using Sequencer v5.0 software. NGS was done on the Illumina MiSeqDX (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) generating 2×150 bp reads. Alignment was conducted with BWA-MEM (version 0.7.10), duplicated reads were marked with Picard (version 1.138) and local alignment, base quality recalibration, and variant calling were performed with the Genome Analysis Tool kit (GATK, version 3.5), SAMtools (version 0.1.19), FreeBayes (v0.9.21-26-gbfd9832) and Scalpel (version 0.5.3). Variant annotation was conducted with a Variant Effect Predictor and dbNSFP. All genetic variants were determined according to the Breast Cancer Information Core database and both BIC database and ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/) database were used from the 2014 onwards. All variants were described according to HUGO-approved systematic nomenclature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multigene Mutation Detection in FFPE Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue samples of patients using a nucleic acid extraction kit (Model: FFPE DNA, Cat NO. ADx-TI01, Xiamen Aide Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd.), and the concentration of DNA was determined using the Qubit dsDNA Assay. The genomic DNA was disrupted using the covaris M220 ultrasound system. The universal kit for multigene mutation detection (Guangzhou Burning Stone Medical Laboratory Co., Ltd., item number: RS03F-12) was used for end repair, 3' end plus A, linker ligation, PCR amplification, and purification of the magnetic beads to obtain a pre-library. Then, we used the human multigene mutation detection capture probe (Lung cure ™ LK101, Lung-cure™ LK165 (Blood Version), Guangzhou Burning Stone Medical Laboratory Co., Ltd.) hybrid to capture the target area, with streptomycin affinity magnetic beads capturing the library fragments that hybridized with the probe, and we used PCR for amplification and purification to determine the size and concentration of the library fragment. The libraries were mixed, denatured, and sequenced on a genetic sequencer (Illumina MiSeq Dx) platform. After the completion of the sequencing, the sequence was analyzed and compared with the second-generation sequencing data analysis software (produced by Guangzhou Burning Stone Medical Laboratory Co., Ltd.), and the results were interpreted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!