The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

49 protocols using pcbascei

1

Evaluating HR and NHEJ in Rif1-/- Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For determining the HR and NHEJ proficiency in WT and Rif1−/− cells the following plasmids were used: pDRGFP (Addgene plasmid #26475) and pCBASceI(Addgene plasmid #26477) for HR and pCVL Traffic Light Reporter1.1(Sce target) (Addgene plasmid #31482) along with pCBASceI for NHEJ. For measuring and controlling transfection efficiency, Turbo-GFP expressing plasmid (Sigma, MISSION SHC003) and Scrambled plasmid (Sigma, MISSION SHC002), were used. In all, 2.5 x 105 cells were co-transfected with 3 μg of plasmid combinations (i.e., 1.5 μg of each plasmid) using Xtremegene-9 reagent from Roche in six-well dish. Cells were transfected twice at an interval of 24 h. Post 48 h of transfection, cells were harvested and the GFP-positive cells (for HR) and RFP-positive cells (for NHEJ) were assessed by flow cytometry. Fifty thousand events were recorded for each sample. Background normalization was done by using samples co-transfected with scrambled—reporter plasmid and also scrambled—pCBASceI plasmid. Final percentage of GFP and RFP-positive cells were calculated based on the transfection efficiency of the cells. Each experiment was independently performed at least thrice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

DSB Localization and NHEJ Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T24 cell received the stable transfection by employing with pimEJ5GFP (AddGene 44026). In brief, pimEJ5GFP received the digestion by exploiting XhoI, as well as the transfection to T24 cell. Steady transfected cells received the selection and maintenance within media covering 2 μg/ml puromycin. To observe DSB localization, stable shNC and shTEX10 cell with the EJ5 reporter received the transfection by using pCBASceI (AddGene 26477), the 12 h incubating process to allow for plasmid expressions and subsequently the observation of DSB localization. To measure NHEJ efficiency, stable shNC and shTEX10 cell with the EJ5 reporter received the transfection by using pCDH and XRCC6 expression plasmids, then the 24 h incubating process for enabling plasmid expressions. Cell received the transfection by using pCBASceI (AddGene 26477), expressing I-SceI, and the 24 h incubation. Next, cell received the harvesting process, the washing process by using PBS, and the resuspending process within PBS. GFP received the detection based on cell sorting under the activation from fluorescence (FACS Calibur, Becton-Dickinson).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Homologous Recombination Repair Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pDRGFP (plasmid # 26475, Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA) and pCBASceI (plasmid # 26477, Addgene) plasmids used for the HRR assay were a kind gift from Maria Jasin [46 (link),47 (link)]. Equimolar quantities of both plasmids were used for co-transfection of the cells using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were collected by trypsinization, washed in PBS then re-suspended in 500 µL of PBS. A total of 50,000 cells were analysed by flow cytometry to estimate the number of GFP-positive cells. The % HRR activity was calculated by subtracting the % of GFP-positive cells in untransfected from the co-transfected sets.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measurement of DNA Repair Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HR and NHEJ assays were performed according to previous reports [38 (link)]. In brief, NHEJ reporter plasmid pimEJ5GFP (Addgene, #44026, USA) or HR reporter plasmid DR-GFP (Addgene, #26475) was transfected in HEK 293T cells. To check the effect of DJ-1 depletion on NHEJ and HR efficiency, cells were transfected with either DJ-1 siRNA or control. The pCBASceI plasmid (Addgene, #26477) was transfected into both control and DJ-1 siRNA-treated cells at 48 h post-transfection. After 24 h, cells were harvested and subjected to flow cytometry (Beckman CytoFLEX). To investigate the effect of DJ-1 overexpression on NHEJ and HR efficiency, cells were transfected with empty vector/ Flag-DJ-1 and pCBASceI plasmids. Cells were collected after 48 h, and the GFP signal was evaluated by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HeLa Cells HR Frequency Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells stable expressing the reporter plasmid pDR-GFP, were transfected with the pDR-GFP plasmid (20 (link)) (gift from Maria Jasin, Addgene plasmid #26475) and selected with puromycin. HeLa pDRGFP cell lines were co-transfected with the coding plasmid for the endonuclease I-SceI (pCBA SceI, a gift from Maria Jasin, Addgene plasmid #26477(19) and the siCTR, siHNRNPD or siMRE11 (L-009271, Dharmacon). Upon 48 h of incubation we analyzed the GFP values (as a readout of HR frequency) through the FACS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

BMAL1 and CLOCK gene constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild-type BMAL1 (BMAL1-WT) and CLOCK (CLOCK-WT) genes were amplified from MRC5 mRNA and cloned into pCDNA3.1-Flag. The BMAL1 S183A (BMAL1-S183A) was generated by site-directed mutation based on wild-type BMAL1. The reduced acetyltransferase activity CLOCK (CLOCK-MUT) was generated by site-directed mutation based on wild-type CLOCK [44 (link)]. The shRNA-resistant CLOCK was generated by synonymously mutating the sequences at shRNA targeting site based on wild-type CLOCK. Plasmid pBABe-HA-ER-I-PpoI and pCBASceI were purchased from Addgene (Plasmid #32565 and #26477).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Plasmid and siRNA Transfection Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmids used were: 21q/16p TALENs4 (link), AIO-GFP (a gift from Steve Jackson, Addgene plasmid #74119; RRID:Addgene_74119), pFRT-TODestGFP_RNAseH1 (a gift from Thomas Tuschl, Addgene plasmid #65784; RRID:Addgene_65784), RNT1-GFP (a gift from Hal Dietz, Addgene plasmid #17708; RRID:Addgene_17708), pmaxGFP (Lonza), pCBASceI (a gift from Maria Jasin, Addgene plasmid #26477; RRID:Addgene_26477), pCMV-GFP (a gift from Connie Cepko, Addgene plasmid #11153; RRID:Addgene_11153) and mCherry2-C1 (a gift from Michael Davidson, Addgene plasmid #54563; RRID:Addgene_54563). siRNA used were: siUPF1, siUPF2, siUPF3B (all siGENOME SMART pool siRNA from Dharmacon), siControl: AAUUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUdTdT34 (link), siUPF1: GAUGCAGUUCCGCUCCAUUdTdT29 (link), siCtIP: GCUAAAACAGGAACGAAUCdTdT34 (link), and si53BP1: GGACUCCAGUGUUGUCAUUdTdT34 (link). Nucleofection were performed using 4D nucleofector X unit (Lonza) and SE cell line kit (program DS150 for RPE1 and DS138 for HCT116). Transfection of plasmid into RPE1 and U2OS were done using Dharmafect kb (Dharmacon) according to manufacturer’s protocol. siRNA transfections were done using Dharmafect 4 (Dharmacon) for RPE1 or Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for U2OS according to manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measuring DNA Repair Mechanisms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA repair reporter (DRR) assay for the activity of homologous recombination repair (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) was performed as previously described [71 (link),72 (link)]. The HUVECs seeded on six-well plates were transfected with 1.6 μg pLCN-DSB Repair Reporter, 1.6 μg pCAGGS DSB Repair Reporter mCherry Donor EF1 BFP plasmid, and 1.6 μg pCBASceI plasmid with Lipofectamine 2000. pCBASceI plasmid alone was used as a negative control. GFP and mCherry signal analysis was conducted using flow cytometry on a FACS scan flow cytometry machine (Beckman, CA, USA) 48 h after transfection. The following plasmids were used: pLCN-DSB Repair Reporter (Addgene, Cat. No. 98895), pCAGGS DSB Repair Reporter mCherry Donor EF1a BFP (Addgene, Cat. No. 98896), and pCBASceI (Addgene, Cat. No. 26477).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DNA Damage Repair in Tau-Expressing Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pcDNA3-Tau4R and Tau-GFP have been described elsewhere [14 (link),23 (link),24 (link)]. pimEJ5GFP was a gift from Jeremy Stark (Addgene plasmid # 44026) (Watertown, MA, USA) [25 (link)]. pDRGFP (Addgene plasmid # 26475) and pCBASceI (Addgene plasmid # 26477) were a gift from Maria Jasin [26 (link)]. Short hairpin Tau and RNA Ctrl vectors were purchased from Santacruz. Doxorubicin, cisplatin, oxaliplatin, 6-thioguanine, and hypoxanthine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint-Louis, MO, USA), and bleomycin from Calbiochem (from Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cells were exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) using an X-ray machine (Clinac23X, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Double-Strand Break Repair Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HR/NHEJ assay was performed as previously described [20 (link),21 (link)]. Briefly, HUVECs were seeded in six-well plates and incubated in either normal glucose or high glucose, as detailed above. When cells reached approximately 70% confluence, adenovirus was infected overnight, followed by administration of an inhibitor. Cells were transfected 24 h later, with 1.6 μg of pLCN-double-strand break (DSB) Repair Reporter DNA damage response (DDR) (Addgene Cat.No.98895, MA, USA), 1.6 μg of pCAGGS DRR mCherry Donor EF1 BFP plasmid (Addgene Cat.No.98896), and 1.6 μg of pCBAsceI (Addgene Cat.No.26477) plasmid with lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). The pCBAsceI or mCherry Donor EF1 BFP plasmid alone was used alone as a control. GFP and mCherry signal analyses were measured using flow cytometry (Beckman) 48 h after transfection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!