The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mouse operant chamber

Manufactured by Med Associates
Sourced in United States

Mouse operant chambers are used to study the behavior of mice in a controlled laboratory environment. These chambers provide a space for mice to perform various tasks and have their responses recorded and analyzed. The core function of these chambers is to facilitate the study of animal behavior through controlled stimuli and responses.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using mouse operant chamber

1

Optical self-stimulation for positive reinforcement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For positive reinforcement induced by vGAT-containing BNST-PBN projections, mice with optical fibers implanted above the PBN were trained in one 1-hour session to nose poke on a fixed-ratio 1 schedule for optical self-stimulation (3 s, 20 Hz, ~10 mW, 473 nm) in a mouse operant chamber (17.8 cm by 15.2 cm by 18.4 cm; Med Associates) (20 (link)). The following day, the mice were run again with the same conditions, and the number of nose pokes recorded in the hour session was recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Operant Conditioning of Negative Reinforcement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For negative reinforcement induced by vGLUT2-containing BNST-PBN projections, mice with optical fibers implanted above the PBN were trained in one 1-hour session to nose poke on a fixed-ratio 1 schedule to turn off optical self-stimulation in a mouse operant chamber (17.8 cm by 15.2 cm by 18.4 cm; Med Associates). Constant photostimulation (20 Hz, ~10 mW, 473 nm) began at the start of each session. Each nose poke resulted in the cessation of the photostimulation for 3 s. The following day, the mice were run again with the same conditions. The number of nose pokes recorded in the hour session was recorded. About 50% of Cre+ mice did not learn the operant task and thus were excluded from the results as nonresponders (fig. S4Y). Nonresponders were classified as animals whose difference of responses between active and inactive was <5. These differences did not correlate to differences in anatomy and likely reflect a failure to learn the instrumental contingency.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Operant Conditioning for Optogenetic Self-Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The procedure for BSR training was described in detail previously [41 (link)]. Briefly, following recovery from surgery, mice were trained to respond on the active lever in standard mouse operant chambers (Med Associates Inc.) for a 1‐s pulse train of laser stimulation at 473 nm wavelength (20 mW, 5 ms duration, 25 Hz) in daily, 1‐hr sessions. Inactive lever responses were recorded but had no scheduled consequences. After acquiring stable responding for 1‐week, mice were trained on a rate‐frequency program during which six stimulation frequencies (100, 50, 25, 10, 5, and 1 Hz) were available for self‐stimulation in descending order for 10‐min each. Once stable responding with < 20% variation across 3 consecutive sessions was established, the test phase began.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Operant Conditioning with Optogenetic Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Behavioural training and testing occurred in mouse operant chambers (Med Associates) interfaced with optogenetic stimulation equipment. Behavioural paradigms were performed during their respective dark cycle. Food-restricted male mice (90% of their free-feeding bodyweight) were trained on a fixed-ratio (1:1) training schedule for one session per day for 60 min, in which each nose-poke resulted in 20 μl of a 15% sucrose administration until the number of nose pokes did not vary >20% across 3 consecutive days. In addition, active nose-poke ports were coupled with a cue light that remained on. With each successful nose-poke, the cue light turned off and a tone would be presented for 3 s. Once the mice reached a stable number of nose pokes, they were habituated for 5 consecutive days to the patch cable with optical stimulation (3 s of 30 Hz) time-locked to the cue following each active nose-poke. After the 5-day habituation phase, mice were then tested following a 2-day break. Active and inactive nose pokes were recorded in addition to time-stamps.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Optogenetic Manipulation of VTA in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For oICSS experiments, mice were injected with AAV-EF1α-DIO-ChR2-EGFP) or the control virus (AAV2-EF1α-DIO-EGFP) and implanted with bilateral custom-made optical fiber targeted to the VTA. Behavioral training and testing occurred in mouse operant chambers (Med Associates) interfaced with optogenetic stimulation equipment. Complete experimental methods are described in the Supplementary Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Optogenetic Stimulation of Reward Pathway

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All tests took place in mouse operant chambers (17.8 cm × 15.2 cm × 18.4 cm; Med Associates). A rotating optical commutator (Doric) was located on the top of the operant chamber and connected to a 473 nm diode-pumped solid-state laser (OEM Laser Systems; see Fig. 2f). Fibers were connected to the implants on the mouse for every training session. The conditioning chamber light was turned on during every training session. Laser power was adjusted to obtain ~10 mW transmittance into the brain. Mice were trained to nose poke in a MED Associates operant box with two nose-poke portals available, “active” and “inactive.” Successful nose pokes on the active nose poker rewarded the mouse with 2s of stimulation (40Hz, 10ms pulse width). An orange cue light turned on above the sipper during the 2s stimulation period. Nose poking to the inactive portal produced no consequences or rewards. Once discrimination was acquired during 1 h long FR1 sessions (less than 30% of total poking in the inactive hole), mice underwent 1 session of FR3. Mice’s motivation was then assessed using a 1 h session of progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. The data were calculated as total number of nose pokes at the active and inactive for each day over the course of the experiment17 (link),64 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optogenetic Manipulation of Reward Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All tests took place in mouse operant chambers (17.8 cm × 15.2 cm × 18.4 cm; Med Associates). A rotating optical commutator (Doric) was located on the top of the operant chamber and connected to a 625 nm diode-pumped solid-state laser (For JAWS experiments) or 473 nm diode-pumped solid-state laser (OEM Laser Systems; see Fig. 2f). Fibers were connected to the implants on the mouse for every training session. Sucrose pellets were delivered at a variable ITI (VI-90s) and animal head entries were recorded by outfitting the pellet receptacles with custom-made IR sensors to record beam breaks during head entries. Upon training, animals underwent counter-balanced of laser on vs. off sessions, where laser was delivered for 10s flanking reward delivery. Laser power was adjusted to obtain ~5 mW transmittance into the brain for JAWS experiments and ~10 mW transmittance for ChR2 experiments. For the JAWS experiments, we used previously employed parameters for laser delivery – 2s on, 2s ramp down and 2s off. For ChR2 experiments, we used 20 Hz, 5ms pulse-width for laser delivery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mouse Operant Chamber Self-Administration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The self-administration sessions were conducted in mouse operant chambers (Med Associates, St. Albans, VT, USA). The chambers (21.4 cm length × 20.3 cm width × 12.7 cm height) were located in a dark room and individually enclosed in wooden sound-attenuating cubicles that were fitted with a ventilation fan that additionally masked external noise. The operant chamber consisted of clear polycarbonate side walls and ceiling, with a modular aluminum front and back walls that allowed operant manipulanda to be mounted. The floor consisted of twenty-four 3.2 mm diameter steel rods that were spaced 8.9 mm apart. Two illuminated nosepoke holes (1.3 cm diameter × 1 cm depth) that were equipped with an infrared beam were mounted 1.5 cm above the floor on the front wall. A spring-covered Tygon tube was connected to the mouse’s catheter through a fluid swivel, and the swivel was connected to a syringe that contained the heroin solution that was placed outside the chambers. The syringe was placed inside a syringe pump (Med Associates, St. Albans, VT, USA; 3.3 revolutions per minute) that was placed on top of the wooden cubicle. MedPC software controlled the delivery of fluids and presentation of visual stimuli and recorded the behavioral data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Operant Conditioning in Mouse Chambers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse operant chambers (Med Associates, Vermont, USA) constructed of clear Perspex (18 × 18 × 15 cm), and contained in sound and light attenuating cubicles were used, containing two retractable levers. Stimulus lights were situated above each lever, with a food magazine between the levers and a speaker located above the magazine. The chambers were connected to a computer, which recorded behaviour using Med-PC Medical Associates software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Optogenetic Modulation of Dopamine Reward

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optogenetic experiments were designed to determine whether Xie2-64 alters DA-dependent rewarding-seeking behaviors (Han et al., 2017 (link); Jordan et al., 2019 (link)). Briefly, AAV-EF1α-DIO-ChR2-EGFP (150 nl, ~2 × 1012 genomes/ml, University of North Carolina Gene Therapy Center) was microinjected into the VTA of adult DAT-Cre mice (AP −3.28; ML 0.43; DV −4.41 mm relative to Bregma) under anesthesia, as we reported previously (Jordan et al., 2019b ). After 4 weeks of recovery, mice were allowed to lever press in mouse operant chambers (Med Associates Inc.) to earn a one second pulse train of laser stimulation (473 nm, 20 mW, 5 ms duration, 25 Hz), paired with one second illumination of a cue light above the active lever during daily, one hour sessions. Inactive responses were recorded but had no scheduled consequences. Once reliable responding was established for 25 Hz, mice were transitioned to a rate-frequency program in which 6 different stimulation frequencies (100, 50, 25, 10, 5, and 1 Hz) were presented in descending order for 10 minutes each. After stable oICSS baselines were established, mice were treated i.p. with vehicle, cocaine alone (2 or 10 mg/kg, 5-min. prior to oICSS sessions), Xie2-64 (10 or 20 mg/kg) or SR144528 (1, 3 mg/kg, 30-min prior to oICSS sessions), either alone or 30-min prior to cocaine (10 mg/kg) and oICSS sessions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!